Optimizing the composition of gelatin methacryloyl and hyaluronic acid methacryloyl hydrogels to maximize mechanical and transport properties using response surface methodology.
design of experiment
diffusion coefficient
gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA)
hyaluronic acid Methacryloyl (HAMA)
response surface methodology
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
ISSN: 1552-4981
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
08
05
2022
received:
12
10
2021
accepted:
11
05
2022
pubmed:
22
10
2022
medline:
21
1
2023
entrez:
21
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hydrogel materials are promising candidates in cartilage tissue engineering as they provide a 3D porous environment for cell proliferation and the development of new cartilage tissue. Both the mechanical and transport properties of hydrogel scaffolds influence the ability of encapsulated cells to produce neocartilage. In photocrosslinkable hydrogels, both of these material properties can be tuned by changing the crosslinking density. However, the interdependent nature of the structural, physical and biological properties of photocrosslinkable hydrogels means that optimizing composition is typically a complicated process, involving sequential and/or iterative steps of physiochemical and biological characterization. The combinational nature of the variables indicates that an exhaustive analysis of all reasonable concentration ranges would be impractical. Herein, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to efficiently optimize the composition of a hybrid of gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) and hyaluronic acid methacryloyl (HAMA) with respect to both mechanical and transport properties. RSM was employed to investigate the effect of GelMA, HAMA, and photoinitiator concentration on the shear modulus and diffusion coefficient of the hydrogel membrane. Two mathematical models were fitted to the experimental data and used to predict the optimum hydrogel composition. Finally, the optimal composition was tested and compared with the predicted values.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36269163
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35169
pmc: PMC10092314
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrogels
0
gelatin methacryloyl
0
Gelatin
9000-70-8
Hyaluronic Acid
9004-61-9
Methacrylates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
526-537Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Dec;19(12):3611-9
pubmed: 18642061
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021 Jan;120:111628
pubmed: 33545814
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018 Mar;12(3):611-621
pubmed: 28512850
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 01;9(12):e113216
pubmed: 25438040
J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Nov;52(2):246-55
pubmed: 10951362
Bioengineering (Basel). 2017 Jan 28;4(1):
pubmed: 28952490
Adv Healthc Mater. 2020 Aug;9(15):e1901794
pubmed: 32548961
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Jul;103(7):2300-8
pubmed: 25369214
Chem Rev. 2020 Oct 14;120(19):10695-10743
pubmed: 32323975
Biochem Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;165:41-48
pubmed: 30831073
Biomacromolecules. 2005 Jan-Feb;6(1):386-91
pubmed: 15638543
Electrophoresis. 2006 Sep;27(17):3349-58
pubmed: 16892481
Soft Matter. 2018 Mar 14;14(11):2142-2151
pubmed: 29488996
Talanta. 2008 Sep 15;76(5):965-77
pubmed: 18761143
Iran Biomed J. 2019 Nov 03;24(2):110-8
pubmed: 31677611
Bone Res. 2017 May 30;5:17014
pubmed: 28584674
Acta Biomater. 2013 Jul;9(7):7081-92
pubmed: 23507088
Acta Biomater. 2009 Sep;5(7):2385-97
pubmed: 19446050
Biomater Sci. 2021 Jun 15;9(12):4246-4259
pubmed: 33710205
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Sep;85:175-180
pubmed: 29906672
Carbohydr Polym. 2021 Jan 1;251:116794
pubmed: 33142549
Front Surg. 2015 Aug 13;2:39
pubmed: 26322314
Biomaterials. 2021 Jan;264:120383
pubmed: 33099133
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Dec;17(12):1639-48
pubmed: 19631307
Macromol Biosci. 2013 May;13(5):551-61
pubmed: 23420700
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jan;10(1):214-23
pubmed: 24140603
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 Mar;111(3):526-537
pubmed: 36269163
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020 Mar;9(3):302-315
pubmed: 31769213
J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2011 May-Aug;9(2):73-86
pubmed: 22065385
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986 Jun;28(6):829-35
pubmed: 18555400
Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Jul 15;114:1174-1185
pubmed: 29634962
J Biomater Appl. 2018 Nov;33(5):619-629
pubmed: 30388384
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):24417-24429
pubmed: 31230240
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 19;7(1):5837
pubmed: 28724980
Biomaterials. 1994 Feb;15(3):231-8
pubmed: 8199296
Biofabrication. 2016 Mar 23;8(1):015019
pubmed: 27004561