Correlation of Impedance Cardiography-Derived and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Stroke Volumes.

Cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameter measurements play an important role in the management of cardiovascular conditions; however, due to limitations of current day technologies, such measurements are either not routinely performed or incorporated into clinical practice. Moreover, measurement of these hemodynamic parameters in the outpatient setting at different time points to assess interval change is currently not feasible. We attempted to validate total-body impedance cardiography-based Non-Invasive Cardiac System (NICaS) derived stroke volume (SV) with that from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), a current day gold standard method of assessment. We compared SV, as it is the primary unit of measurement utilized by both technologies. Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing CMR were also investigated by NICaS following CMR. The consistency of non-invasive technology-derived SV measurement was validated by NICaS measurement in 10 subjects, both before and after CMR. Of the 41 enrolled patients; data from 38 patients was adequate for comparison (motion artifact prevented CMR measures in 3 patients). Fourteen patients (37%) were female; mean age was 55 ± 15 years (28-87 years) and body-mass index was 28.7 ± 5.5 kg/m

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.