Proteomic Profiling of Plant and Pathogen Interaction on the Leaf Epidermis.
Proteomics
/ methods
Arabidopsis
/ metabolism
Plant Diseases
/ microbiology
Proteome
/ metabolism
Plant Proteins
/ metabolism
Plant Leaves
/ metabolism
Arabidopsis Proteins
/ metabolism
Epidermis
/ metabolism
Transcription Factors
/ metabolism
Fungal Proteins
/ metabolism
Protein Kinases
/ metabolism
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Plant Epidermis
/ metabolism
effector
fungal pathogen
label-free quantification
leaf epidermis
plant immunity
plant–pathogen interaction
secretory proteins
shotgun proteomics
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Oct 2022
12 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
16
09
2022
revised:
29
09
2022
accepted:
09
10
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
29
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The plant epidermis is the first line of plant defense against pathogen invasion, and likely contains important regulatory proteins related to the plant-pathogen interaction. This study aims to identify the candidates of these regulatory proteins expressed in the plant epidermis. We performed comparative proteomic studies to identify rapidly and locally expressed proteins in the leaf epidermis inoculated with fungal phytopathogen. The conidia solutions were dropped onto the Arabidopsis leaf surface, and then, we collected the epidermal tissues from inoculated and mock-treated leaves at 4 and 24 hpi. The label-free quantification methods showed that expressions of Arabidopsis proteins, which are related to defense signals, such as BAK1, MKK5, receptor-like protein kinases, transcription factors, and stomatal functions, were rapidly induced in the epidermal tissues of inoculated leaves. In contrast, most of them were not differentially regulated by fugal inoculation in the whole leaves. These findings clearly indicate that epidermal proteomics can monitor locally expressed proteins in inoculated areas of plant tissues. We also identified the 61 fungal proteins, including effector-like proteins specifically expressed on the Arabidopsis epidermis. Our new findings suggested that epidermal proteomics is useful for understanding the local expressions of plant and fungal proteins related to their interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36293025
pii: ijms232012171
doi: 10.3390/ijms232012171
pmc: PMC9603099
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proteome
0
Plant Proteins
0
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Transcription Factors
0
Fungal Proteins
0
Protein Kinases
EC 2.7.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Kakenhi
ID : 23580060, 26450053,15H05780, and 18K05642
Références
Biol Chem. 2012 Dec;393(12):1533-46
pubmed: 23460952
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Mar 27;6:194
pubmed: 25870605
Fungal Genet Biol. 2008 Apr;45(4):389-99
pubmed: 17950638
Mol Plant Pathol. 2010 May;11(3):361-9
pubmed: 20447284
Plant Cell Physiol. 2009 Jun;50(6):1171-5
pubmed: 19433491
Science. 1997 Aug 22;277(5329):1113-6
pubmed: 9262483
Plant Signal Behav. 2008 Dec;3(12):1077-82
pubmed: 19513241
Plant Cell. 2007 Jan;19(1):63-73
pubmed: 17259259
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Feb;13(2):159-69
pubmed: 10659706
Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):977-83
pubmed: 11875555
Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):922-31
pubmed: 17540573
Plant Cell. 2008 Dec;20(12):3210-26
pubmed: 19114538
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 May 14;13:79
pubmed: 23672620
J Exp Bot. 2020 Mar 25;71(6):2085-2097
pubmed: 31844896
J Proteome Res. 2010 May 7;9(5):2402-11
pubmed: 20307098
Plant J. 2013 Jan;73(1):131-42
pubmed: 22974502
FEBS Lett. 1991 Oct 7;291(1):127-31
pubmed: 1936240
Plant J. 2008 Apr;54(1):30-42
pubmed: 18088309
Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Jul;79(4-5):333-46
pubmed: 22572939
Plant Physiol. 2005 Jul;138(3):1195-204
pubmed: 16009995
Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):742-4
pubmed: 19423812
Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):1391-1408
pubmed: 27913741
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
Curr Genet. 2005 Dec;48(6):366-79
pubmed: 16283313
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(12):3347-57
pubmed: 18653692
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 May;5(5):598-600
pubmed: 20404519
Plant Cell. 2003 Apr;15(4):809-34
pubmed: 12671079
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 8;116(2):496-505
pubmed: 30584105
PLoS Pathog. 2011 Dec;7(12):e1002460
pubmed: 22216007
Transgenic Res. 2007 Aug;16(4):531-8
pubmed: 17180735
BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Oct 23;8:108
pubmed: 18947417
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Sep;19(9):2094-2110
pubmed: 29569316
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Oct;20(10):651-663
pubmed: 26440434
Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo). 2018 Sep 25;35(3):187-192
pubmed: 31819723
PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(8):e1003581
pubmed: 23990790
Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo). 2018;35(1):71-79
pubmed: 31275039
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr 22;165(2):791-809
pubmed: 24755512
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Jul 28;11:110
pubmed: 21798058
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 11;12:807448
pubmed: 35087559
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 30;11:579553
pubmed: 33329641
Plant Pathol J. 2014 Jun;30(2):136-50
pubmed: 25288996
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 25;7(1):6389
pubmed: 28743869
Proteome Sci. 2012 Oct 30;10(1):61
pubmed: 23110430
PLoS Genet. 2018 Jul 25;14(7):e1007546
pubmed: 30044782
Nature. 2015 May 14;521(7551):213-6
pubmed: 25731164