How does the dental benefits act encourage Australian families to seek and utilise oral health services?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 16 08 2022
accepted: 20 10 2022
entrez: 28 11 2022
pubmed: 29 11 2022
medline: 1 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed to analyse the content of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 as a foundation for the Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) to determine how the Act encourages Australian families to seek and utilise oral health services. This was a qualitative narrative document analysis conducted in 2022. Data was collected by searching formal websites for retrieving documents that reported the Australian Dental Benefits Act. The eligibility of the retrieved documents was assessed based on authenticity, credibility, representativeness, and meaningfulness of the data. A seven-steps procedure was applied for framework analysis. The content of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 provides directions on the three categories of operational, collective, and constitutional rules. Operational rules at the level of oral health providers and the population, as the service end users, can be demonstrated as rules in use in a mutual interaction with the collective and constitutional rules. The consequence of governing the rules at the community level can easily define how the oral health services are provided and utilised. The response is sent to the government level for better regulation of oral health service delivery and utilisation. Then, with interaction and advocacy with the diverse range of stakeholders and interdisciplinary partnerships, with community groups, non-government sectors and councils, the rules can be transformed, adopted, monitored, and enforced. Another mechanism of response has occurred at the providers' and users' level and to the operational rules to community groups and stakeholders via advertising and promoting the utilisation and provision of oral health services. This study integrates the perspective of politicians with those of policy makers to reconsider the role and significance of the rules based on the triple collaborations among oral health users and oral service providers, the community, and the stakeholders as well as the government. A comprehensive attention is still needed in future revisions of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 according to the contextual factors, socioeconomic and geographical attributes of the population for better implementation of de facto rules and more effective outcomes of the interventions. It is recommended that further research be undertaken utilising a mix-method approach for a holistic view prior to further revisions of the Act or proposal of probable upcoming schemes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
This study aimed to analyse the content of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 as a foundation for the Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) to determine how the Act encourages Australian families to seek and utilise oral health services.
METHODS
This was a qualitative narrative document analysis conducted in 2022. Data was collected by searching formal websites for retrieving documents that reported the Australian Dental Benefits Act. The eligibility of the retrieved documents was assessed based on authenticity, credibility, representativeness, and meaningfulness of the data. A seven-steps procedure was applied for framework analysis.
RESULTS
The content of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 provides directions on the three categories of operational, collective, and constitutional rules. Operational rules at the level of oral health providers and the population, as the service end users, can be demonstrated as rules in use in a mutual interaction with the collective and constitutional rules. The consequence of governing the rules at the community level can easily define how the oral health services are provided and utilised. The response is sent to the government level for better regulation of oral health service delivery and utilisation. Then, with interaction and advocacy with the diverse range of stakeholders and interdisciplinary partnerships, with community groups, non-government sectors and councils, the rules can be transformed, adopted, monitored, and enforced. Another mechanism of response has occurred at the providers' and users' level and to the operational rules to community groups and stakeholders via advertising and promoting the utilisation and provision of oral health services.
CONCLUSION
This study integrates the perspective of politicians with those of policy makers to reconsider the role and significance of the rules based on the triple collaborations among oral health users and oral service providers, the community, and the stakeholders as well as the government. A comprehensive attention is still needed in future revisions of the Dental Benefits Act 2008 according to the contextual factors, socioeconomic and geographical attributes of the population for better implementation of de facto rules and more effective outcomes of the interventions. It is recommended that further research be undertaken utilising a mix-method approach for a holistic view prior to further revisions of the Act or proposal of probable upcoming schemes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36441685
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277152
pii: PONE-D-22-22909
pmc: PMC9704637
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0277152

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Bastani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Mar 25;:
pubmed: 35332972
Hum Resour Health. 2019 May 30;17(1):37
pubmed: 31146760
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;120(3):234-239
pubmed: 30763780
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Feb 18;18(1):34
pubmed: 30777079
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):274-280
pubmed: 34078533
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):158
pubmed: 32487152
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):
pubmed: 32784215
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Apr;44(2):304-309
pubmed: 31648675
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;49(4):369-376
pubmed: 33314322
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):249-260
pubmed: 31327369
Int Dent J. 2008 Jun;58(3):115-21
pubmed: 18630105
N S W Public Health Bull. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):5-11
pubmed: 22487326

Auteurs

Peivand Bastani (P)

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Reyhane Izadi (R)

School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Nithin Manchery (N)

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Diep Ha (D)

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Hanny Calache (H)

La Trobe Rural Health School, Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health (ACIOH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Ajesh George (A)

Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health (ACIOH), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.
Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
School of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Loc Do (L)

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH