Evolution of the connectivity and indispensability of a transferable gene: the simplicity hypothesis.
Connectivity
Constructive neutral evolution
Gene-host coevolution
Horizontal gene transfer
Indispensability
The simplicity hypothesis
Journal
BMC ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2730-7182
Titre abrégé: BMC Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101775613
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 11 2022
30 11 2022
Historique:
received:
25
04
2022
accepted:
26
10
2022
entrez:
30
11
2022
pubmed:
1
12
2022
medline:
3
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The number of interactions between a transferable gene or its protein product and genes or gene products native to its microbial host is referred to as connectivity. Such interactions impact the tendency of the gene to be retained by evolution following horizontal gene transfer (HGT) into a microbial population. The complexity hypothesis posits that the protein product of a transferable gene with lower connectivity is more likely to function in a way that is beneficial to a new microbial host compared to the protein product of a transferable gene with higher connectivity. A gene with lower connectivity is consequently more likely to be fixed in any microbial population it enters by HGT. The more recently proposed simplicity hypothesis posits that the connectivity of a transferable gene might increase over time within any single microbial population due to gene-host coevolution, but that differential rates of colonization of microbial populations by HGT in accordance with differences in connectivity might act to counter this and even reduce connectivity over time, comprising an evolutionary trade-off. We present a theoretical model that can be used to predict the conditions under which gene-host coevolution might increase or decrease the connectivity of a transferable gene over time. We show that the opportunity to enter new microbial populations by HGT can cause the connectivity of a transferable gene to evolve toward lower values, particularly in an environment that is unstable with respect to the function of the gene's protein product. We also show that a lack of such opportunity in a stable environment can cause the connectivity of a transferable gene to evolve toward higher values. Our theoretical model suggests that the connectivity of a transferable gene can change over time toward higher values corresponding to a more sessile state of lower transferability or lower values corresponding to a more itinerant state of higher transferability, depending on the ecological milieu in which the gene exists. We note, however, that a better understanding of gene-host coevolutionary dynamics in natural microbial systems is required before any further conclusions about the veracity of the simplicity hypothesis can be drawn.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The number of interactions between a transferable gene or its protein product and genes or gene products native to its microbial host is referred to as connectivity. Such interactions impact the tendency of the gene to be retained by evolution following horizontal gene transfer (HGT) into a microbial population. The complexity hypothesis posits that the protein product of a transferable gene with lower connectivity is more likely to function in a way that is beneficial to a new microbial host compared to the protein product of a transferable gene with higher connectivity. A gene with lower connectivity is consequently more likely to be fixed in any microbial population it enters by HGT. The more recently proposed simplicity hypothesis posits that the connectivity of a transferable gene might increase over time within any single microbial population due to gene-host coevolution, but that differential rates of colonization of microbial populations by HGT in accordance with differences in connectivity might act to counter this and even reduce connectivity over time, comprising an evolutionary trade-off.
RESULTS
We present a theoretical model that can be used to predict the conditions under which gene-host coevolution might increase or decrease the connectivity of a transferable gene over time. We show that the opportunity to enter new microbial populations by HGT can cause the connectivity of a transferable gene to evolve toward lower values, particularly in an environment that is unstable with respect to the function of the gene's protein product. We also show that a lack of such opportunity in a stable environment can cause the connectivity of a transferable gene to evolve toward higher values.
CONCLUSION
Our theoretical model suggests that the connectivity of a transferable gene can change over time toward higher values corresponding to a more sessile state of lower transferability or lower values corresponding to a more itinerant state of higher transferability, depending on the ecological milieu in which the gene exists. We note, however, that a better understanding of gene-host coevolutionary dynamics in natural microbial systems is required before any further conclusions about the veracity of the simplicity hypothesis can be drawn.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36451084
doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-02091-w
pii: 10.1186/s12862-022-02091-w
pmc: PMC9710062
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA
63231-63-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Mar;27(3):703-13
pubmed: 19808865
Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1036-42
pubmed: 15173110
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):343-8
pubmed: 21149709
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 22;277(1683):819-27
pubmed: 19864285
Curr Biol. 2021 Jan 25;31(2):346-357.e3
pubmed: 33157023
J Evol Biol. 2012 Jun;25(6):1002-19
pubmed: 22487312
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Apr;28(4):1481-9
pubmed: 21149642
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1843-57
pubmed: 27189546
Nature. 1970 Aug 1;227(5257):520-1
pubmed: 5428476
Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Jun;61(4):489-95
pubmed: 12167368
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Feb;22(2):200-9
pubmed: 15483330
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-49
pubmed: 29033457
Genome Biol. 2007;8(8):R156
pubmed: 17678544
Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):920-1
pubmed: 21071654
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Aug;22(8):1721-32
pubmed: 15901840
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Mar;25(3):559-67
pubmed: 18158322
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(4):523-32
pubmed: 22436996
Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Nov 5;13(11):
pubmed: 34665261
Biophys J. 2016 Jan 5;110(1):258-68
pubmed: 26745428
J Mol Evol. 1999 Aug;49(2):169-81
pubmed: 10441669
Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Dec;90:49-55
pubmed: 24080312
Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713-9
pubmed: 14456043
J Mol Evol. 2021 Apr;89(3):172-182
pubmed: 33604782
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 01;5(4):e9989
pubmed: 20376325
Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624-6
pubmed: 5637732
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 1;31(21):6283-9
pubmed: 14576317
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):388-389
pubmed: 32433630
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Aug;33(8):633-645
pubmed: 30041995
Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1531-45
pubmed: 10101175
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):289-91
pubmed: 10592249
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 27;375(1797):20190361
pubmed: 32146889
PLoS Genet. 2012 Jun;8(6):e1002787
pubmed: 22761588
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 30;96(7):3801-6
pubmed: 10097118
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Apr;20(4):206-218
pubmed: 34773098
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D362-D368
pubmed: 27924014
BMC Genomics. 2006 Mar 03;7:40
pubmed: 16515682
Int J Evol Biol. 2012;2012:813015
pubmed: 22675653
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2265-76
pubmed: 12446817