Ribonuclease T2 represents a distinct circularly permutated version of the BECR RNases.
AlphaFold
BECR fold
ancestral topology reconstruction
circular permutation
evolutionary origin
fold recognition
ribonuclease T2
Journal
Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society
ISSN: 1469-896X
Titre abrégé: Protein Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9211750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
revised:
07
11
2022
received:
08
08
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
pmc-release:
01
01
2024
pubmed:
9
12
2022
medline:
4
1
2023
entrez:
8
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detection of homologous relationships among proteins and understanding their mechanisms of diversification are major topics in the fields of protein science, bioinformatics, and phylogenetics. Recent developments in sequence/profile-based and structural similarity-based methods have greatly facilitated the unification and classification of many protein families into superfamilies or folds, yet many proteins remain unclassified in current protein databases. As one of the three earliest identified RNases in biology, ribonuclease T2, also known as RNase I in Escherichia coli, RNase Rh in fungi, or S-RNase in plant, is thought to be an ancient RNase family due to its widespread distribution and distinct structure. In this study, we present evidence that RNase T2 represents a circularly permutated version of the BECR (Barnase-EndoU-Colicin E5/D-RelE) fold RNases. This subtle relationship cannot be detected by traditional methods such as sequence/profile-based comparisons, structure-similarity searches, and circular permutation detections. However, we were able to identify the structural similarity using rational reconstruction of a theoretical RNase T2 ancestor via a reverse circular permutation process, followed by structural modeling using AlphaFold2, and structural comparisons. This relationship is further supported by the fact that RNase T2 and other typical BECR RNases, namely Colicin D, RNase A, and BrnT, share similar catalytic site configurations, all involving an analogous set of conserved residues on the α0 helix and the β4 strand of the BECR fold. This study revealed a hidden root of RNase T2 in bacterial toxin systems and demonstrated that reconstruction and modeling of ancestral topology is an effective strategy to identify remote relationship between proteins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36477982
doi: 10.1002/pro.4531
pmc: PMC9793965
doi:
Substances chimiques
ribonuclease T(2)
EC 3.1.27.1
Ribonuclease, Pancreatic
EC 3.1.27.5
Colicins
0
Ribonucleases
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e4531Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Protein Society.
Références
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014 Jun;26:92-103
pubmed: 24952217
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2002;28(2):79-122
pubmed: 12109772
Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Feb;81(2):77-89
pubmed: 10190580
Structure. 2012 May 9;20(5):862-73
pubmed: 22579253
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jun;39(11):4532-52
pubmed: 21306995
Structure. 2014 May 6;22(5):707-18
pubmed: 24657090
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007 Mar;31(2):212-37
pubmed: 17253975
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Dec 18;20:261-273
pubmed: 35024098
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583-589
pubmed: 34265844
J Mol Biol. 2000 May 19;298(5):859-73
pubmed: 10801354
J Bacteriol. 2017 Jul 11;199(15):
pubmed: 28559295
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1079:263-71
pubmed: 24170408
Genomics. 2005 Feb;85(2):208-20
pubmed: 15676279
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(3):e1002445
pubmed: 22496628
Front Genet. 2012 Dec 13;3:283
pubmed: 23248642
Structure. 2019 Nov 5;27(11):1660-1674.e5
pubmed: 31515004
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 1;21(7):951-60
pubmed: 15531603
Trends Biochem Sci. 2010 May;35(5):253-9
pubmed: 20189811
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 May 19;45(9):5013-5025
pubmed: 28398546
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12365-70
pubmed: 16895992
Gene. 2010 Dec 1;469(1-2):18-30
pubmed: 20713135
Biochemistry. 1999 Feb 23;38(8):2452-61
pubmed: 10029539
Virus Evol. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):veab014
pubmed: 33692906
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012 Jun 29;2:89
pubmed: 22919680
Methods Enzymol. 2001;341:3-28
pubmed: 11582786
Bioinformatics. 2015 Apr 15;31(8):1316-8
pubmed: 25505094
J Mol Biol. 2009 Nov 6;393(4):898-908
pubmed: 19712680
Biol Direct. 2012 Jun 25;7:18
pubmed: 22731697
Biochemistry. 2011 Sep 20;50(37):7835-41
pubmed: 21838247
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
mBio. 2019 May 7;10(3):
pubmed: 31064832
Protein Sci. 2023 Jan;32(1):e4531
pubmed: 36477982
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 May 24;:
pubmed: 35610055
Structure. 2012 Oct 10;20(10):1641-8
pubmed: 22981948
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13167-71
pubmed: 11698683
Genome Biol. 2008 Jan 18;9(1):R11
pubmed: 18201387
J Gen Physiol. 1940 Sep 20;24(1):15-32
pubmed: 19873197
J Biol Chem. 2012 Apr 6;287(15):12098-110
pubmed: 22334680
Q Rev Biophys. 2011 Feb;44(1):1-93
pubmed: 20854710
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755-63
pubmed: 9918945
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Sep 1;40(17):8733-42
pubmed: 22735700
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D226-9
pubmed: 14681400
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Dec;39(22):9473-97
pubmed: 21890906
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
pubmed: 9254694
RNA. 2020 Jul;26(7):803-813
pubmed: 32284351
Protein Eng. 2001 Aug;14(8):533-42
pubmed: 11579221
EMBO J. 2004 Apr 7;23(7):1474-82
pubmed: 15014439
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Dec 04;10(12):e1003926
pubmed: 25474468
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Apr 22;33(7):2302-9
pubmed: 15849316