First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
FGFR2
cholangiocarcinoma
fusion
molecular diagnostics
round robin test
translocation
Journal
The journal of pathology. Clinical research
ISSN: 2056-4538
Titre abrégé: J Pathol Clin Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101658534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
06
12
2022
received:
04
10
2022
accepted:
14
12
2022
pubmed:
13
1
2023
medline:
7
2
2023
entrez:
12
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including FGFR2 gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised FGFR2::BICC1, FGFR2::DBP, FGFR2::TRIM8, and FGFR2::ATE1 fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of FGFR2 fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of FGFR2 gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36635225
doi: 10.1002/cjp2.308
pmc: PMC9896158
doi:
Substances chimiques
TRIM8 protein, human
0
Carrier Proteins
0
Nerve Tissue Proteins
0
FGFR2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100-107Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Apr;6:628-638
pubmed: 32315234
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 May;17(5):318-332
pubmed: 28303906
J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 4;277(40):37315-22
pubmed: 12163497
Genome Res. 2021 Mar;31(3):448-460
pubmed: 33441414
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(8):1540-1549
pubmed: 35871236
Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Sep;22(18):6321-35
pubmed: 12192032
Cancer Discov. 2021 Oct;11(10):2488-2505
pubmed: 33926920
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jan;120(2):165-171
pubmed: 30420614
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020 Apr;52:56-67
pubmed: 31899106
J Hepatol. 2021 Aug;75(2):351-362
pubmed: 33741397
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;6(10):803-815
pubmed: 34358484
Genes Dev. 2016 Apr 1;30(7):751-71
pubmed: 27036966
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(9):1701-1708
pubmed: 35986087
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1144-D1149
pubmed: 29099951
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015 May-Jun;4(3):215-66
pubmed: 25772309
Future Oncol. 2020 Oct;16(30):2385-2399
pubmed: 32677452
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):671-684
pubmed: 32203698
Cancer Discov. 2021 Feb;11(2):326-339
pubmed: 33218975
Cancer Discov. 2013 Jun;3(6):636-47
pubmed: 23558953