Trusted Data Spaces as a Viable and Sustainable Solution for Networks of Population-Based Patient Registries.
cancer registries
data federation
noncommunicable diseases
population-based patient registries
registry network model
trusted research environments
Journal
JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 01 2023
13 01 2023
Historique:
received:
07
10
2021
accepted:
11
10
2022
revised:
31
05
2022
entrez:
13
1
2023
pubmed:
14
1
2023
medline:
18
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Harmonization and integration of health data remain as the focus of many ongoing efforts toward the goal of optimizing health and health care policies. Population-based patient registries constitute a critical element of these endeavors. Although their main function is monitoring and surveillance of a particular disease within a given population, they are also an important data source for epidemiology. Comparing indicators across national boundaries brings an extra dimension to the use of registry data, especially in regions where supranational initiatives are or could be coordinated to leverage good practices; this is particularly relevant for the European Union. However, strict data protection laws can unintentionally hamper the efforts of data harmonization to ensure the removal of statistical bias in the individual data sets, thereby compromising the integrated value of registries' data. Consequently, there is the motivation for creating a new paradigm to ensure that registries can operate in an environment that is not unnecessarily restrictive and to allow accurate comparison of data to better ascertain the measures and practices that are most conducive to the public health of societies. The pan-European organizational model of cancer registries, owing to its long and successful establishment, was considered as a sound basis from which to proceed toward such a paradigm. However, it has certain drawbacks, particularly regarding governance, scalability, and resourcing, which are essential elements to consider for a generic patient registry model. These issues are addressed in a proposal of an adapted model that promises a valuable pan-European data resource for epidemiological research, while providing a closely regulated environment for the processing of pseudonymized patient summary data on a broader scale than has hitherto been possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36637894
pii: v9i1e34123
doi: 10.2196/34123
pmc: PMC9883740
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e34123Informations de copyright
©Nicholas Nicholson, Sandra Caldeira, Artur Furtado, Ciaran Nicholl. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 13.01.2023.
Références
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):220-7
pubmed: 22155485
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):517-8
pubmed: 20031886
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):65-70
pubmed: 25944870
Arch Public Health. 2017 Jan 18;75:3
pubmed: 28116076
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jul;45(17_suppl):14-19
pubmed: 28683665
J Registry Manag. 2014 Spring;41(1):31-7
pubmed: 24893186
Cancer. 2019 Nov 1;125(21):3729-3737
pubmed: 31381143
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):e039575
pubmed: 33055119
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1165-74
pubmed: 24131614