Inclusion Bodies: Status Quo and Perspectives.

E. coli IB-based products Inclusion bodies Inclusion body processing Recombinant protein production, inclusion body refolding, inclusion body challenges, inclusion body quality

Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
entrez: 19 1 2023
pubmed: 20 1 2023
medline: 24 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multiple E. coli cultivations, producing recombinant proteins, lead to the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs). IBs historically were considered as nondesired by-products, due to their time- and cost-intensive purification. Nowadays, many obstacles in IB processing can be overcome. As a consequence, several industrial processes with E. coli favor IB formation over soluble production options due to the high space time yields obtained. Within this chapter, we discuss the state-of-the art biopharmaceutical IB process, review its challenges, highlight the recent developments and perspectives, and also propose alternative solutions, compared to the state-of-the art processing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36656513
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2930-7_1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Recombinant Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-13

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Jozala AF et al (2016) Biopharmaceuticals from microorganisms: from production to purification. Braz J Microbiol 47:51–63
doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.007
Baeshen MN et al (2015) Production of biopharmaceuticals in E. coli: current scenario and future perspectives. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25(7):953–962
doi: 10.4014/jmb.1412.12079
Walsh G (2018) Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2018. Nat Biotechnol 36(12):1136–1145
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4305
Rosano GL, Morales ES, Ceccarelli EA (2019) New tools for recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli: a 5-year update. Protein Sci 28(8):1412–1422
doi: 10.1002/pro.3668
Castineiras TS et al (2018) E-coli strain engineering for the production of advanced biopharmaceutical products. FEMS Microbiol Lett 365(15)
Gupta SK, Shukla P (2017) Microbial platform technology for recombinant antibody fragment production: a review. Crit Rev Microbiol 43(1):31–42
doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2016.1150959
Singhvi P et al (2020) Bacterial inclusion bodies: a treasure trove of bioactive proteins. Trends Biotechnol 38(5):474–486
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.011
Singh A et al (2015) Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process. Microb Cell Factories 14:41–41
doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0222-8
Pauk JN et al (2021) Advances in monitoring and control of refolding kinetics combining PAT and modeling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105(6):2243–2260
doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11151-y
Bhatwa A et al (2021) Challenges associated with the formation of recombinant protein inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli and strategies to address them for industrial applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:9
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.630551
Baneyx F, Mujacic M (2004) Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 22(11):1399–1408
doi: 10.1038/nbt1029
Bowden GA, Paredes AM, Georgiou G (1991) Structure and morphology of protein inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 9(8):725
doi: 10.1038/nbt0891-725
Rinas U et al (2017) Bacterial inclusion bodies: discovering their better half. Trends Biochem Sci 42(9):726–737
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.005
Wang L (2009) Towards revealing the structure of bacterial inclusion bodies. Prion 3(3):139–145
doi: 10.4161/pri.3.3.9922
Kopito RR (2000) Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation. Trends Cell Biol 10(12):524–530
doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01852-3
Rueda F et al (2014) Production of functional inclusion bodies in endotoxin-free Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(22):9229–9238
doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6008-9
Roca-Pinilla R et al (2020) Exploring the use of leucine zippers for the generation of a new class of inclusion bodies for pharma and biotechnological applications. Microb Cell Factories 19(1):175
doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01425-x
Ki MR, Pack SP (2020) Fusion tags to enhance heterologous protein expression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(6):2411–2425
doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10402-8
Fatima K, Naqvi F, Younas H (2021) A review: molecular chaperone-mediated folding, unfolding and disaggregation of expressed recombinant proteins. Cell Biochem Biophys 79(2):153–174
doi: 10.1007/s12013-021-00970-5
Schlieker C, Bukau B, Mogk A (2002) Prevention and reversion of protein aggregation by molecular chaperones in the E-coli cytosol: implications for their applicability in biotechnology. J Biotechnol 96(1):13–21
doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00033-0
Paraskevopoulou V, Falcone FH (2018) Polyionic tags as enhancers of protein solubility in recombinant protein expression. Microorganisms 6(2):47
Waugh DS (2016) The remarkable solubility-enhancing power of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein. Postepy Biochem 62(3):377–382
doi: 10.18388/pb.2016_41
Duan X et al (2019) Efficient production of aggregation prone 4-alpha-glucanotransferase by combined use of molecular chaperones and chemical chaperones in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 292:68–75
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.01.014
Pina AS, Lowe CR, Roque ACA (2014) Challenges and opportunities in the purification of recombinant tagged proteins. Biotechnol Adv 32(2):366–381
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.001
Gopal GJ, Kumar A (2013) Strategies for the production of recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. Protein J 32(6):419–425
doi: 10.1007/s10930-013-9502-5
Correa A, Oppezzo P (2015) Overcoming the solubility problem in E. coli: available approaches for recombinant protein production. Methods Mol Biol 1258:27–44
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2205-5_2
Jurgen B et al (2010) Quality control of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Factories 9:41
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-41
Peternel S, Komel R (2011) Active protein aggregates produced in Escherichia coli. Int J Mol Sci 12(11):8275–8287
doi: 10.3390/ijms12118275
Carratala JV et al (2021) Title: insoluble proteins catch heterologous soluble proteins into inclusion bodies by intermolecular interaction of aggregating peptides. Microb Cell Factories 20(1):30
doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01524-3
Villaverde A et al (2015) Functional protein aggregates: just the tip of the iceberg. Nanomedicine (Lond) 10(18):2881–2891
doi: 10.2217/nnm.15.125
Martinez-Alonso M, Garcia-Fruitos E, Villaverde A (2008) Yield, solubility and conformational quality of soluble proteins are not simultaneously favored in recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 101(6):1353–1358
doi: 10.1002/bit.21996
Garcia-Fruitos E, Aris A, Villaverde A (2007) Localization of functional polypeptides in bacterial inclusion bodies. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(1):289–294
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01952-06
Garcia-Fruitos E et al (2012) Bacterial inclusion bodies: making gold from waste. Trends Biotechnol 30(2):65–70
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.09.003
Worrall DM, Goss NH (1989) The formation of biologically active beta-galactosidase inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Aust J Biotechnol 3(1):28–32
Tokatlidis K et al (1991) High activity of inclusion bodies formed in Escherichia coli overproducing Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase D. FEBS Lett 282(1):205–208
doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80478-L
Jager VD et al (2019) Tailoring the properties of (catalytically)-active inclusion bodies. Microb Cell Factories 18:33
doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1081-5
Jager VD et al (2018) A synthetic reaction Cascade implemented by Colocalization of two proteins within catalytically active inclusion bodies. ACS Synth Biol 7(9):2282–2295
doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00274
Jager VD et al (2020) Catalytically-active inclusion bodies for biotechnology-general concepts, optimization, and application. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(17):7313–7329
doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10760-3
Kloss R et al (2018) Tailor-made catalytically active inclusion bodies for different applications in biocatalysis. Cat Sci Technol 8(22):5816–5826
doi: 10.1039/C8CY01891J
Kloss R et al (2018) Catalytically active inclusion bodies of L-lysine decarboxylase from E. coli for 1,5-diaminopentane production. Sci Rep 8:5856
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24070-2
Carrio M et al (2005) Amyloid-like properties of bacterial inclusion bodies. J Mol Biol 347(5):1025–1037
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.030
Singh A et al (2020) Structure-function relationship of inclusion bodies of a multimeric protein. Front Microbiol 11:876
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00876
Hoffmann D et al (2018) Reassessment of inclusion body-based production as a versatile opportunity for difficult-to-express recombinant proteins. Crit Rev Biotechnol 38(5):729–744
doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1398134
Slouka C et al (2019) Perspectives of inclusion bodies for bio-based products: curse or blessing? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(3):1143–1153
doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9569-1
Garcia-Fruitos E (2010) Inclusion bodies: a new concept. Microb Cell Factories 9:80
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-80
Ramon A, Senorale-Pose M, Marin M (2014) Inclusion bodies: not that bad. Front Microbiol 5:56
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00056
de Marco A et al (2019) Bacterial inclusion bodies are industrially exploitable amyloids. FEMS Microbiol Rev 43(1):53–72
doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy038
Corchero JL et al (2014) Recombinant protein materials for bioengineering and nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond) 9(18):2817–2828
doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.153
Gatti-Lafranconi P et al (2011) Concepts and tools to exploit the potential of bacterial inclusion bodies in protein science and biotechnology. FEBS J 278(14):2408–2418
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08163.x
Sans C et al (2012) Inclusion bodies of fuculose-1-phosphate aldolase as stable and reusable biocatalysts. Biotechnol Prog 28(2):421–427
doi: 10.1002/btpr.1518
Han GH et al (2017) Leucine zipper-mediated targeting of multi-enzyme cascade reactions to inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli for enhanced production of 1-butanol. Metab Eng 40:41–49
doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.12.012
Seras-Franzoso J et al (2014) Improving protein delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 from bacterial inclusion bodies used as cell culture substrates. Acta Biomater 10(3):1354–1359
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.021
Unzueta U et al (2017) Engineering tumor cell targeting in nanoscale amyloidal materials. Nanotechnology 28(1):015102
doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/28/1/015102
Martinez-Miguel M et al (2020) Stable anchoring of bacteria-based protein nanoparticles for surface-enhanced cell guidance. J Mater Chem B 8(23):5080–5088
doi: 10.1039/D0TB00702A
Seras-Franzoso J et al (2016) Cellular uptake and intracellular fate of protein releasing bacterial amyloids in mammalian cells. Soft Matter 12(14):3451–3460
doi: 10.1039/C5SM02930A
Seras-Franzoso J et al (2012) Bioadhesiveness and efficient mechanotransduction stimuli synergistically provided by bacterial inclusion bodies as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine (Lond) 7(1):79–93
doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.83
Loo Y et al (2015) Self-assembled proteins and peptides as scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 4(16):2557–2586
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500402
Carratala JV et al (2020) In vivo bactericidal efficacy of GWH1 antimicrobial peptide displayed on protein nanoparticles, a potential alternative to antibiotics. Pharmaceutics 12(12)
Liovic M et al (2012) Inclusion bodies as potential vehicles for recombinant protein delivery into epithelial cells. Microb Cell Factories 11:67
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-67
Seras-Franzoso J et al (2013) A nanostructured bacterial bioscaffold for the sustained bottom-up delivery of protein drugs. Nanomedicine (Lond) 8(10):1587–1599
doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.188
Vazquez E et al (2012) Functional inclusion bodies produced in bacteria as naturally occurring nanopills for advanced cell therapies. Adv Mater 24(13):1742–1747
doi: 10.1002/adma.201104330
Nahalka J, Nidetzky B (2007) Fusion to a pull-down domain: a novel approach of producing Trigonopsis variabilisD-amino acid oxidase as insoluble enzyme aggregates. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(3):454–461
doi: 10.1002/bit.21244
Nahalka J, Vikartovska A, Hrabarova E (2008) A crosslinked inclusion body process for sialic acid synthesis. J Biotechnol 134(1–2):146–153
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.01.014
Nahalka J, Mislovicova D, Kavcova H (2009) Targeting lectin activity into inclusion bodies for the characterisation of glycoproteins. Mol BioSyst 5(8):819–821
doi: 10.1039/b900526a
Nahalka J (2008) Physiological aggregation of maltodextrin phosphorylase from Pyrococcus furiosus and its application in a process of batch starch degradation to alpha-D-glucose-1-phosphate. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(4):219–223
doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0287-4
Yang XF, Pistolozzi M, Lin ZL (2018) New trends in aggregating tags for therapeutic protein purification. Biotechnol Lett 40(5):745–753
doi: 10.1007/s10529-018-2543-2
Achmuller C et al (2007) N-pro fusion technology to produce proteins with authentic N termini in E-coli. Nat Methods 4(12):1037–1043
doi: 10.1038/nmeth1116
Cheng XW et al (2010) Expression and purification of antimicrobial peptide CM4 by N-pro fusion technology in E. coli. Amino Acids 39(5):1545–1552
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0625-0
Wellhoefer M et al (2013) Autoprotease N-pro: analysis of self-cleaving fusion protein. J Chromatogr A 1304:92–100
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.06.062
Wang X et al (2015) Formation of active inclusion bodies induced by hydrophobic self-assembling peptide GFIL8. Microb Cell Factories 14:88
doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0270-0
Wang WY et al (2017) Change of the N-terminal codon bias combined with tRNA supplementation outperforms the selected fusion tags for production of human d-amino acid oxidase as active inclusion bodies. Biotechnol Lett 39(11):1733–1740
doi: 10.1007/s10529-017-2413-3
Humer D, Spadiut O (2018) Wanted: more monitoring and control during inclusion body processing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34(11):158
doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2541-5
Zielinski M et al (2019) Expression and purification of recombinant human insulin from E. coli 20 strain. Protein Expr Purif 157:63–69
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.02.002
Upadhyay V, Singh A, Panda AK (2016) Purification of recombinant ovalbumin from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 117:52–58
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2015.09.015
Przybycien TM et al (1994) Secondary structure characterization of beta-lactamase inclusion bodies. Protein Eng 7(1):131–136
doi: 10.1093/protein/7.1.131
Trinh NTM, Thuoc TL, Thao DTP (2021) Production of recombinant human G-CSF from non-classical inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Braz J Microbiol 52(2):541–546
doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00413-y
Sarker A, Rathore AS, Gupta RD (2019) Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E-coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process. Microb Cell Factories 18:5
doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1053-9
Peternel S et al (2005) Fragility and solubility of non-classical inclusion bodies. J Biotechnol 118:S25–S25
Jevsevar S et al (2005) Production of nonclassical inclusion bodies from which correctly folded protein can be extracted. Biotechnol Prog 21(2):632–639
doi: 10.1021/bp0497839
Kaur J, Kumar A, Kaur J (2017) Strategies for optimization of heterologous protein expression in E. coli: roadblocks and reinforcements. Int J Biol Macromol; 106:803-822
Hoffmann D et al (2017) Reassessment of inclusion body-based production as a versatile opportunity for difficult-to-express recombinant proteins. Crit Rev Biotechnol:1–16 38(5):729-744.
Eggenreich B et al (2016) Production strategies for active heme-containing peroxidases from E. coli inclusion bodies–a review. Biotechnol Rep 10:75–83
doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2016.03.005
Basu A, Li X, Leong SSJ (2011) Refolding of proteins from inclusion bodies: rational design and recipes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92(2):241
doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3513-y
Burgess RR (2009) Refolding solubilized inclusion body proteins. In: Methods in enzymology. Elsevier, pp 259–282
Rathore AS et al (2013) Refolding of biotech therapeutic proteins expressed in bacteria. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88(10):1794–1806
doi: 10.1002/jctb.4152
Vallejo LF, Rinas U (2004) Strategies for the recovery of active proteins through refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. Microb Cell Factories 3:11
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-3-11
Hashemzadeh MS et al (2021) Expression, Solubilization, refolding and final purification of recombinant proteins as expressed in the form of “classical inclusion bodies” in E. coli. Protein Pept Lett 28(2):122–130
doi: 10.2174/0929866527999200729182831
Singh A, Upadhyay V, Panda AK (2015) Solubilization and refolding of inclusion body proteins. Methods Mol Biol 1258:283–291
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2205-5_15
Wurm DJ et al (2018) Teaching an old pET new tricks: tuning of inclusion body formation and properties by a mixed feed system in E. coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(2):667–676
doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8641-6
Malekian R et al (2019) High-yield production of granulocyte-macrophage Colony-stimulating factor in E. coli BL21 (DE3) by an auto-induction strategy. Iran J Pharm Res 18(1):469–478
Chua LH, Tan SC, Liew MWO (2018) Process intensification of core streptavidin production through high-cell-density cultivation of recombinant E. coli and a temperature-based refolding method. J Biotechnol 276-277:34–41
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.04.012
Eggenreich B, Wurm DJ, Rajamanickam V, Klausser R, Slouka C, Spadiut O (2020) High pressure homogenization is a key unit operation in inclusion body processing. J Biotechnol X6:100022
doi: 10.1016/j.btecx.2020.100022
Schimek C et al (2020) Extraction of recombinant periplasmic proteins under industrially relevant process conditions: selectivity and yield strongly depend on protein titer and methodology. Biotechnol Prog 36(5):e2999
doi: 10.1002/btpr.2999
Vemula S et al (2015) Improved production and characterization of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from E. coli under optimized downstream processes. Protein Expr Purif 108:62–72
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2015.01.010
Georgiou G, Valax P (1999) Isolating inclusion bodies from bacteria. Methods Enzymol 309:48–58
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)09005-9
Singh SM, Panda AK (2005) Solubilization and refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. J Biosci Bioeng 99(4):303–310
doi: 10.1263/jbb.99.303
Ling C et al (2015) Approaches for the generation of active papain-like cysteine proteases from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31(5):681–690
doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1804-7
Alibolandi M, Mirzahoseini H (2011) Chemical assistance in refolding of bacterial inclusion bodies. Biochem Res Int 2011:1
doi: 10.1155/2011/631607
Burgess RR (2009) Refolding solubilized inclusion body proteins. Methods Enzymol 463:259–282
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)63017-2
Ye X et al (2019) An efficient large-scale refolding technique for recovering biologically active recombinant human FGF-21 from inclusion bodies. Int J Biol Macromol 135:362–372
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.167
Jungbauer A, Kaar W (2007) Current status of technical protein refolding. J Biotechnol 128(3):587–596
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.12.004
Yamaguchi H, Miyazaki M (2014) Refolding techniques for recovering biologically active recombinant proteins from inclusion bodies. Biomol Ther 4(1):235–251
Jeon SJ, Park JH (2020) Refolding, characterization, and dye decolorization ability of a highly thermostable laccase from Geobacillus sp. JS12. Protein Expr Purif 173:105646
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2020.105646
Seetaraman Amritha TM et al (2020) Cloning, expression and purification of recombinant dermatopontin in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 15(11):e0242798
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242798
Gupta V et al (2020) Expression, purification and characterization of alpha-synuclein fibrillar specific scFv from inclusion bodies. PLoS One 15(11):e0241773
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241773
Chong HY, Leow CY, Leow CH (2021) Generation of soluble, disulfide-rich JEV NS1 protein recognizable by anti-NS1 antibodies through a simplified, in vitro refolding approach. Int J Biol Macromol 185:485–493
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.146
Eguia FAP et al (2021) Development of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (nartograstim) production process in Escherichia coli compatible with industrial scale and with no antibiotics in the culture medium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105(1):169–183
doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-11014-y
Wingfield PT, Palmer I, Liang SM (2014) Folding and purification of insoluble (inclusion body) proteins from Escherichia coli. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 78:6.5.1–6.5.30
Wingfield PT (2014) Preparation of soluble proteins from Escherichia coli. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 78:6.2.1–6.2.22
Xi G et al (2020) Refolding and purification of cGMP-grade recombinant human neurturin from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Protein Expr Purif 168:105552
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.105552
Eiberle MK, Jungbauer A (2010) Technical refolding of proteins: do we have freedom to operate? Biotechnol J 5(6):547–559
doi: 10.1002/biot.201000001
Su Z, Lu D, Liu Z (2011) Refolding of inclusion body proteins from E. coli. Methods Biochem Anal 54:319–338
doi: 10.1002/9780470939932.ch13
Lilie H, Schwarz E, Rudolph R (1998) Advances in refolding of proteins produced in E-coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol 9(5):497–501
doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(98)80035-9
Fang M, Huang HL (2001) Advances in in vitro refolding of inclusion body proteins. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 17(6):608–612
Umetsu M et al (2003) How additives influence the refolding of immunoglobulin-folded proteins in a stepwise dialysis system. Spectroscopic evidence for highly efficient refolding of a single-chain Fv fragment. J Biol Chem 278(11):8979–8987
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212247200
Ban B, Sharma M, Shetty J (2020) Optimization of methods for the production and refolding of biologically active disulfide bond-rich antibody fragments in microbial hosts. Antibodies (Basel) 9(3):39
Liu YD et al (2007) Identification of an oxidative refolding intermediate of recombinant consensus interferon from inclusion bodies and design of a two-stage strategy to promote correct disulfide-bond formation. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 48(Pt 4):189–198
Moghadam M et al (2015) Refolding process of cysteine-rich proteins:Chitinase as a model. Rep Biochem Mol Biol 4(1):19–24
Tiwari K et al (2012) Refolding of recombinant human granulocyte colony- stimulating factor: effect of cysteine/cystine redox system. Indian J Biochem Biophys 49(4):285–288
Kante RK et al (2018) Optimized upstream and downstream process conditions for the improved production of recombinant human asparaginase (rhASP) from Escherichia coli and its characterization. Biologicals 56:45–53
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.10.002
Kim CK et al (2014) Expression and purification of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in fed-batch culture of Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172(5):2425–2435
doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0708-y
Pathak M et al (2016) Analytical characterization of in vitro refolding in the quality by design paradigm: Refolding of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Pharm Biomed Anal 126:124–131
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.05.001
Cabrita LD, Bottomley SP (2004) Protein expression and refolding–a practical guide to getting the most out of inclusion bodies. Biotechnol Annu Rev 10:31–50
doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(04)10002-1
Zhang T et al (2009) Modeling of protein refolding from inclusion bodies. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 41(12):1044–1052
doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmp098
Freydell EJ et al (2011) Techno-economic evaluation of an inclusion body Solubilization and recombinant protein refolding process. Biotechnol Prog 27(5):1315–1328
doi: 10.1002/btpr.652
Neubauer P et al (2021) Potential of integrating model-based design of experiments approaches and process analytical technologies for bioprocess scale-down. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 177:1–28
Scully J et al (2020) Beyond heuristics: CFD-based novel multiparameter scale-up for geometrically disparate bioreactors demonstrated at industrial 2kL-10kL scales. Biotechnol Bioeng 117(6):1710–1723
doi: 10.1002/bit.27323
Pizarro SA et al (2009) Biomanufacturing process analytical technology (PAT) application for downstream processing: using dissolved oxygen as an indicator of product quality for a protein refolding reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng 104(2):340–351
doi: 10.1002/bit.22382
ICHQ8, Pharmaceutical Development (R1). 2008 ( www.ich.org ): p. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm128003.htm
ICHQ9, Quality Risk Management wwwichorg , 2006
Middelberg APJ, O’Neill BT (1998) Harvesting recombinant protein inclusion bodies. In: Bioseparation and bioprocessing, pp 81–106
doi: 10.1002/9783527619641.ch21
Novak S et al (2009) Electrophoretic deposition as a tool for separation of protein inclusion bodies from host bacteria in suspension. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 340(1–3):155–160
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.03.023
Middelberg, APJ (2000) Large-Scale Recovery of Protein Inclusion Bodies by Continuous Centrifugation. In: Desai MA (eds) Downstream Processing of Proteins. Methods in Biotechnology, vol 9. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-027-8_5
Chura-Chambi RM et al (2019) Protein refolding based on high hydrostatic pressure and alkaline pH: application on a recombinant dengue virus NS1 protein. PLoS One 14(1):e0211162
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211162
Clark ED (2001) Protein refolding for industrial processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(2):202–207
doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00200-7
Lemke LS et al (2015) Investigation on solubilization protocols in the refolding of the thioredoxin TsnC from Xylella fastidiosa by high hydrostatic pressure approach. Protein Expr Purif 106:72–77
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2014.10.013
Rodrigues D et al (2014) Effect of pressure on refolding of recombinant pentameric cholera toxin B. J Biotechnol 173:98–105
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.12.006
Humer D, Ebner J, Spadiut O (2020) Scalable high-performance production of recombinant horseradish peroxidase from E. coli inclusion bodies. Int J Mol Sci 21(13):4625
Narayanan H et al (2020) Bioprocessing in the digital age: the role of process models. Biotechnol J 15(1):e1900172
doi: 10.1002/biot.201900172
Scheper T et al (2021) Digitalization and bioprocessing: promises and challenges. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 176:57–69
Singhvi P et al (2021) Molecular attributes associated with refolding of inclusion body proteins using the freeze-thaw method. Front Microbiol 12:618559
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.618559
Tsumoto K et al (2004) Role of arginine in protein refolding, solubilization, and purification. Biotechnol Prog 20(5):1301–1308
doi: 10.1021/bp0498793
Pereira LM et al (2014) A simple strategy for the purification of native recombinant full-length human RPL10 protein from inclusion bodies. Protein Expr Purif 101:115–120
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2014.06.003
Wang J, Ma W, Wang X (2021) Insights into the structure of Escherichia coli outer membrane as the target for engineering microbial cell factories. Microb Cell Factories 20(1):73
doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01565-8
Mamat U et al (2015) Detoxifying Escherichia coli for endotoxin-free production of recombinant proteins. Microb Cell Factories 14:57
doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0241-5
Lee CT, Morreale G, Middelberg APJ (2004) Combined in-fermenter extraction and cross-flow microfiltration for improved inclusion body processing. Biotechnol Bioeng 85(1):103–113
doi: 10.1002/bit.10878
Ehgartner D et al (2017) A novel method to recover inclusion body protein from recombinant E-coli fed-batch processes based on phage I broken vertical bar X174-derived lysis protein E. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(14):5603–5614
doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8281-x

Auteurs

Julian Kopp (J)

Research Division Integrated Bioprocess Development, TU Wien Institute of Chemical, Environmental, and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna, Austria. julian.kopp@tuwien.ac.at.

Oliver Spadiut (O)

Research Division Integrated Bioprocess Development, TU Wien Institute of Chemical, Environmental, and Bioscience Engineering, Vienna, Austria. oliver.spadiut@tuwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

Female Biofilms Animals Lactobacillus Mice
Host Specificity Bacteriophages Genomics Algorithms Escherichia coli
Biofilms Horses Animals Escherichia coli Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Aminoacid functionalised magnetite nanoparticles Fe

Spoială Angela, Motelica Ludmila, Ilie Cornelia-Ioana et al.
1.00
Magnetite Nanoparticles Tryptophan Biocompatible Materials Microbial Sensitivity Tests Humans

Classifications MeSH