Do all vegetarians have a lower cardiovascular risk? A prospective study.


Journal

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-1983
Titre abrégé: Clin Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 04 05 2022
revised: 25 11 2022
accepted: 06 01 2023
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
entrez: 30 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Vegetarian diets are heterogeneous and their health benefits may vary. This study aimed to compare the cardiovascular risk among vegetarian diets that meet existing health guidelines, those that do not, and diets that include red meat. 391,124 participants (55.5% women) from the UK Biobank prospective population-based study were included. Using data from a food frequency questionnaire, participants were categorised into lacto-vegetarian or meat-eaters. Then, both groups were dichotomised into a healthier and less healthy group using an unweighted score based on current UK guidelines. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and myocardial infarction (MI) incidence - both separately and as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) - were the outcomes included. Associations between types of diets and health outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounder factors. After a median follow-up of 10.4 years, there were 40,048 MACE. When the analyses were adjusted for prevalent morbidity and lifestyle factors, people who followed healthier vegetarian and meat-eater diets had 18% (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.92) and 5% (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.97) lower risk of MACE than less healthy meat-eaters. Similar patterns were identified for the individual outcomes, with the strongest association observed for MI. The cardiovaculasr risk among less healthy vegetarians and less healthy meat-eaters were not significnatly different. Vegetarian diets are heterogeneous and the cardiovascular risk varied accordingly. Future studies should consider the overall dietary patterns of vegetarians rather than just based on meat consumption. Guidelines advocating a plant-based diet need to stress the importance of overall diet quality in addition to the reduction of meat.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Vegetarian diets are heterogeneous and their health benefits may vary. This study aimed to compare the cardiovascular risk among vegetarian diets that meet existing health guidelines, those that do not, and diets that include red meat.
METHODS
391,124 participants (55.5% women) from the UK Biobank prospective population-based study were included. Using data from a food frequency questionnaire, participants were categorised into lacto-vegetarian or meat-eaters. Then, both groups were dichotomised into a healthier and less healthy group using an unweighted score based on current UK guidelines. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and myocardial infarction (MI) incidence - both separately and as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) - were the outcomes included. Associations between types of diets and health outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounder factors.
RESULTS
After a median follow-up of 10.4 years, there were 40,048 MACE. When the analyses were adjusted for prevalent morbidity and lifestyle factors, people who followed healthier vegetarian and meat-eater diets had 18% (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.92) and 5% (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.97) lower risk of MACE than less healthy meat-eaters. Similar patterns were identified for the individual outcomes, with the strongest association observed for MI. The cardiovaculasr risk among less healthy vegetarians and less healthy meat-eaters were not significnatly different.
CONCLUSIONS
Vegetarian diets are heterogeneous and the cardiovascular risk varied accordingly. Future studies should consider the overall dietary patterns of vegetarians rather than just based on meat consumption. Guidelines advocating a plant-based diet need to stress the importance of overall diet quality in addition to the reduction of meat.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36716619
pii: S0261-5614(23)00012-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.01.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

269-276

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health [UK]

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest None to declare.

Auteurs

Fanny Petermann-Rocha (F)

School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.

Carlos Celis-Morales (C)

School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Laboratorio de Rendimiento Humano, Grupo de Estudio en Educación, Actividad Física y Salud (GEEAFyS), Universidad Católica Del Maule, Talca, Chile.

Jill P Pell (JP)

School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Frederick K Ho (FK)

School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Frederick.ho@glasgow.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH