Timing of Active Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy.
cardiogenic shock
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
left ventricular unloading
Journal
JACC. Heart failure
ISSN: 2213-1787
Titre abrégé: JACC Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101598241
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
20
05
2022
revised:
25
10
2022
accepted:
03
11
2022
pubmed:
2
2
2023
medline:
11
3
2023
entrez:
1
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is currently unclear if active left ventricular (LV) unloading should be used as a primary treatment strategy or as a bailout in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). This study sought to evaluate the association between timing of active LV unloading and implantation of VA-ECMO with outcomes of patients with CS. Data from 421 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and active LV unloading at 18 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of device implantation in early vs delayed active LV unloading (defined by implantation before up to 2 hours after VA-ECMO). Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between early active LV unloading and 30-day mortality as well as successful weaning from ventilation. Overall, 310 (73.6%) patients with CS were treated with early active LV unloading. Early active LV unloading was associated with a lower 30-day mortality risk (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) and a higher likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.19-3.93) but not with more complications. Importantly, the relative mortality risk increased and the likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation decreased almost proportionally with the time interval between VA-ECMO implantation and (delayed) initiation of active LV unloading. This exploratory study lends support to the use of early active LV unloading in CS patients on VA-ECMO, although the findings need to be validated in a randomized controlled trial.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
It is currently unclear if active left ventricular (LV) unloading should be used as a primary treatment strategy or as a bailout in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to evaluate the association between timing of active LV unloading and implantation of VA-ECMO with outcomes of patients with CS.
METHODS
Data from 421 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and active LV unloading at 18 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of device implantation in early vs delayed active LV unloading (defined by implantation before up to 2 hours after VA-ECMO). Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between early active LV unloading and 30-day mortality as well as successful weaning from ventilation.
RESULTS
Overall, 310 (73.6%) patients with CS were treated with early active LV unloading. Early active LV unloading was associated with a lower 30-day mortality risk (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) and a higher likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.19-3.93) but not with more complications. Importantly, the relative mortality risk increased and the likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation decreased almost proportionally with the time interval between VA-ECMO implantation and (delayed) initiation of active LV unloading.
CONCLUSIONS
This exploratory study lends support to the use of early active LV unloading in CS patients on VA-ECMO, although the findings need to be validated in a randomized controlled trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36724180
pii: S2213-1779(22)00657-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.005
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05577195']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
321-330Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Schrage and Westermann were funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research, and Dr Schrage is also funded by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung. This study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Abiomed. However, Abiomed was not involved in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish. Dr Schrage has received speaker fees from Abiomed and AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. Dr Blankenberg has received grants and personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Bayer, Siemens, and Thermo Fisher; grants from Singulex; and personal fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, AMGEN, Medtronic, Pfizer, Roche, Siemens Diagnostics, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. Dr Eckner has received speaker fees from Abiomed, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. Dr Kirchhof has received research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from the European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research; has received research support from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation; has received honoraria from several such companies in the past but not in the last 3 years; and is listed as inventor on 2 patents held by the University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783; unrelated to the submitted work). Dr Mangner has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Biotronik, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bayer, Abbott, Abiomed, and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. Dr Mierke has received speaker fees from Abiomed, outside the submitted work. Dr Morrow has served as a member of the TIMI Study Group, which has received institutional research grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, Arca Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Intarcia, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, Siemens, The Medicines Company, and Zora Biosciences; and received consulting fees from Arca Biopharma, Bayer Pharma, InCarda, Inflammatix, Merck, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Pappalardo has served as a consultant for Abiomed. Dr Westermann has received speaker fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.