Use of Smartphone-Based Electronic Medical Records by Nurses in Tertiary Teaching Hospitals.
Journal
Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN
ISSN: 1538-9774
Titre abrégé: Comput Inform Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101141667
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2023
01 Jul 2023
Historique:
medline:
10
7
2023
pubmed:
3
2
2023
entrez:
2
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The adoption of smartphone-based electronic medical records is increasing in the healthcare sector. Nurses are the largest group using mobile electronic medical records. This study examined the system quality, information quality, service quality, usefulness, and ease of using mobile electronic medical records, the effects of the three qualities of the mobile electronic medical records on the usefulness and ease of use, and nurses' preference for using mobile electronic medical records. The participants were 210 nurses using a mobile electronic medical record system for over a month. An instrument modified from existing instruments was used. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. The participants perceived the system and information quality more positively than the service quality of the mobile electronic medical records. They perceived the mobile electronic medical records as being useful and easy to use. System quality and information quality significantly affected the perception of the usefulness and ease of using the mobile electronic medical record. They preferred to use it as a means to identify patients' conditions at any time. For user satisfaction and the implications for nursing practice, the usability and functionality of a mobile electronic medical record system should be continuously assessed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36731012
doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000956
pii: 00024665-990000000-00057
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
522-530Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Kim S, Lee KH, Hwang H, Yoo S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making . 2016;16: 12.
Heponiemi T, Kaihlanen AM, Gluschkoff K, et al. The association between using a mobile version of an electronic health record and the well-being of nurses: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Medical Informatics . 2021;9(7): e28729.
Lee Y, Park YR, Kim J, Kim JH, Kim WS, Lee JH. Usage pattern differences and similarities of mobile electronic medical records among health care providers. JMIR mHealth and uHealth . 2017;5(12): e178.
Davis SA. Clinician perceptions of a mobile electronic health record application [doctoral dissertation]. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland; 2020.
Jung KY, Kim S, Kim K, et al. Frequent mobile electronic medical records users respond more quickly to emergency department consultation requests: retrospective quantitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth . 2020;8(2): e14487.
Ehrler F, Wu DTY, Ducloux P, Blondon K. A mobile application to support bedside nurse documentation and care: a time and motion study. JAMIA Open . 2021;4(3): ooab046.
Lee S. Effect of electronic medical record quality on nurses' perceived usefulness and ease of use [published online ahead of print February 1, 2022]. Computers Informatics Nursing . doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000845.
doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000845
DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems . 2003;19(4): 9–30.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences . 1996;27: 451–481.
Chuttur MY. Overview of the technology acceptance model: origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems . 2009;9(37). http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37
Nelson RR, Todd PA, Wixom BH. Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems . 2005;21(4): 199–235.
Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing . 1991;67(4): 420–450.
Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly . 1989;13(3): 319–340.
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health . 2006;29(5): 489–497.
Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism . 2012;10(2): 486–489.
Mayers A. Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology . Pearson Education; 2013:52–54.
Mayers A. Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology . Pearson Education; 2013:409–430.