Indistinct assessment of the quality of traditional Chinese medicine in precision medicine exampling as safflower.


Journal

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
ISSN: 1873-264X
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Biomed Anal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309336

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 08 11 2022
revised: 24 01 2023
accepted: 29 01 2023
pubmed: 4 2 2023
medline: 21 3 2023
entrez: 3 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The quality of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guarantees its clinical efficacy. Although advanced analytical techniques and methods can accurately determine the content of chemical components in TCM, it is difficult to accurately determine its clinical efficacy. In addition, the current analytical methods and technologies are complex and have difficulty meeting the requirements of a rapid, accurate and convenient determination of TCM quality. In this study, we first propose the concept of "indistinct" evaluation of the quality of TCM, that is, combining biological potency with character evaluation, quantifying the character evaluation, and preparing the safflower quality grade evaluation card based on the character analysis, which provides research ideas and methods for the rapid and accurate evaluation of the quality of TCM. We determined the biological potency of different batches of safflower based on the in vitro antiplatelet aggregation model and divided the safflower samples into two grades based on the biological potency. We further collected the color information of different grades of safflower samples, quantified the color information of different grades of safflower, drew a quality grade evaluation card for the rapid judgment of safflower quality grade and verified its accuracy by pharmacodynamic evaluation. To further analyze the differences in the material basis of different grades of safflower, the LC-MS method was used to simultaneously determine the contents of 19 chemical components, such as myricetin, in different grades of safflower samples to analyze the differences in the material basis of different grades of safflower. The result shows that the different grades of safflower exhibited significant differences in color. The pharmacodynamic results show that the quality evaluation card prepared based on color information can accurately evaluate quality, and the effect of first-class safflower is significantly better than that of second-class safflower. The chemical analysis results of different grades of safflower show that there are also significant differences between them, among which hypericin, 6-hydroxyapin-6-O-glucose-7-O-glucuronide, 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6-O-diglucoside-7-O-glucuronic acid glycoside, 6-hydroxykaempferol-3,6,7-tri-O-glucoside and hydroxysafflower yellow A exhibit significant differences, which may be the main differentiating components of different grades of safflower. This study preliminarily confirmed that the "indistinct" evaluation of the quality of TCM based on character analysis is accurate and scientific, and the quality evaluation card prepared can accurately judge the quality of TCM, providing a reference for the rapid application of TCM character evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36736110
pii: S0731-7085(23)00046-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115277
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Drugs, Chinese Herbal 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115277

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Yongfeng Zhou (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China.

Huajuan Jiang (H)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China.

Xulong Huang (X)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China.

Ke Rao (K)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China.

Di Wang (D)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China.

Qinghua Wu (Q)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: 20122051@cdutcm.edu.cn.

Ping Zhang (P)

Medical Supplies Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100#, West 4th Ring Middle Rd., Fengtai, Beijing 100039, China. Electronic address: zhp1231@126.com.

Jin Pei (J)

State Key Laboratory of Southwestern Chinese Medicine Resources, School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: peixjin@163.com.

Articles similaires

Humans Pisum sativum Breast Neoplasms Tandem Mass Spectrometry Plant Extracts
Humans Female Precision Medicine Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Breast Neoplasms
Humans Kidney Neoplasms Carcinoma, Renal Cell Female Male

Classifications MeSH