The Effect of Different Staple Sizes on Leak Pressure Among Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Pilot Study.


Journal

Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
received: 22 10 2022
accepted: 30 01 2023
revised: 23 01 2023
medline: 10 4 2023
pubmed: 7 2 2023
entrez: 6 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gastric leak after LSG is a devastating complication, reported in less than 1% of cases. Consensus is lacking regarding the best approach to construct the sleeve, staple sizes, and reinforcement methods on potential leak development. In this study, we have compared the leak pressure of two different staple sizes in the resected portion of the stomach, immediately after its removal. Fifteen patients were enrolled. Leak pressure of a vascular, small-size stapler was significantly higher than that of a medium-size one. All leaks appeared in the proximal third of the resected stomach. These results may have clinical implication. Since other factors may play a role in the risk for leaks following sleeve gastrectomy, a large, prospective clinical trial should be performed comparing the two staple sizes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36746867
doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06491-9
pii: 10.1007/s11695-023-06491-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1292-1294

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kroll D, Borbely Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity The SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.20897 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897 pubmed: 29340679 pmcid: 5833546
Al-Kurd A, Grinbaum R, Abubeih A, Verbner A, Kupietzky A, Mizrahi I, et al. Not all leaks are created equal: a comparison between leaks after sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3775–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3409-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3409-3 pubmed: 30022425
Tan JT, Kariyawasam S, Wijeratne T, Chandraratna HS. Diagnosis and management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;20:403–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0020-7 pubmed: 19936855
Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel; Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, Basso N, Bellanger D, Boza C, et al. 2012 International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(1):8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019 .
Gagner M, Kemmeter P. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):396–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2 pubmed: 30993513
Jin Lee Y, Na Kim Y, Park S. Measurement of stomach wall thickness to guide staple selection during sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2140–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04439-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04439-x
Boeker C, Schneider B, Markov V, et al. Primary sleeve gastrectomy and leaks: the impact of fundus-wall thickness and staple heights on leakage—an observational study of 500 patients. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021;8:747171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.747171 .
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.747171 pubmed: 34746223 pmcid: 8566748
López-Monclova J, Targarona E, Balague C, Vilallonga R, Rodrioguez-Gomez L, Baeza-Vitolas M. Pilot study comparing the leak pressure of the sleeved stomach with and without reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4721–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3123-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3123-0 pubmed: 23949483

Auteurs

Ihav Hajeychia (I)

Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky, 44469, Kfar Saba, Israel.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Shmuel Avital (S)

Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky, 44469, Kfar Saba, Israel. avitalshmuel@gmail.com.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. avitalshmuel@gmail.com.

Vitaly Tyomkin (V)

Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky, 44469, Kfar Saba, Israel.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Nitzan Goldberg (N)

Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky, 44469, Kfar Saba, Israel.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Roye Inbar (R)

Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky, 44469, Kfar Saba, Israel.
The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH