Interprofessional simulation of acute care for nursing and medical students: interprofessional competencies and transfer to the workplace.
Interprofessional education
Simulation acute care
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Feb 2023
11 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
11
07
2022
accepted:
23
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Teamwork and communication are essential tools for doctors, nurses and other team members in the management of critically ill patients. Early interprofessional education during study, using acute care simulation, may improve teamwork and communication between interprofessional team members on the long run. A comparative sequential quantitative-qualitative study was used to understand interprofessional learning outcomes in nursing and medical students after simulation of acute care. Students were assigned to a uni- or interprofessional training. Questionnaires were used to measure short and long term differences in interprofessional collaboration and communication between the intervention and control group for nursing and medical students respectively. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted to gain a better understanding of IPE in acute simulation. One hundred and ninety-one students participated in this study (131 medical, 60 nursing students). No differences were found between the intervention and control group in overall ICCAS scores for both medical and nursing students (p = 0.181 and p = 0.441). There were no differences in ICS scores between the intervention and control group. Focus groups revealed growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration for both medical and nursing students. Interprofessional simulation training did show measurable growth of interprofessional competencies, but so did uniprofessional training. Both medical and nursing students reported increased awareness of perspective and expertise of own and other profession. Furthermore, they reported growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration in transfer to their workplace.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Teamwork and communication are essential tools for doctors, nurses and other team members in the management of critically ill patients. Early interprofessional education during study, using acute care simulation, may improve teamwork and communication between interprofessional team members on the long run.
METHODS
METHODS
A comparative sequential quantitative-qualitative study was used to understand interprofessional learning outcomes in nursing and medical students after simulation of acute care. Students were assigned to a uni- or interprofessional training. Questionnaires were used to measure short and long term differences in interprofessional collaboration and communication between the intervention and control group for nursing and medical students respectively. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted to gain a better understanding of IPE in acute simulation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and ninety-one students participated in this study (131 medical, 60 nursing students). No differences were found between the intervention and control group in overall ICCAS scores for both medical and nursing students (p = 0.181 and p = 0.441). There were no differences in ICS scores between the intervention and control group. Focus groups revealed growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration for both medical and nursing students.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Interprofessional simulation training did show measurable growth of interprofessional competencies, but so did uniprofessional training. Both medical and nursing students reported increased awareness of perspective and expertise of own and other profession. Furthermore, they reported growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration in transfer to their workplace.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36774481
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04053-2
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04053-2
pmc: PMC9921059
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):695-702
pubmed: 20304547
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):473-81
pubmed: 16268852
Med Teach. 2007 Oct;29(8):735-51
pubmed: 18236271
Am J Surg. 2011 Oct;202(4):500-6
pubmed: 21943950
J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov;28(6):553-8
pubmed: 24828620
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 30;10:83
pubmed: 20353577
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):805-11
pubmed: 22587539
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1121-34
pubmed: 10626367
Med Educ. 2004 Apr;38(4):448-54
pubmed: 15025646
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Aug 1;58(8):454-462
pubmed: 31373666
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):e62-e69
pubmed: 28157808
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;42(2):101-103
pubmed: 32384366
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:564-570
pubmed: 27871594
BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):591-4
pubmed: 12637408
Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Aug;19(6):480-7
pubmed: 10693496
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):28-34
pubmed: 27849422
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):989-96
pubmed: 23702524
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1021-1031
pubmed: 20410778
Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):782-7
pubmed: 22209834
Resuscitation. 2012 Jan;83(1):13-5
pubmed: 22056619
World J Surg. 2020 Jan;44(1):124-133
pubmed: 31535167
Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):e100-e108
pubmed: 33337727
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Feb;34(2):259-64
pubmed: 23518067
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):2-19
pubmed: 17538823
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;55(2):171-80
pubmed: 19800711
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):125-32
pubmed: 15051706
Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):112-5
pubmed: 12745516
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 May;34(5):e1-2
pubmed: 22766200
Resuscitation. 2011 Sep;82(9):1224-30
pubmed: 21664026
J Interprof Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):772-783
pubmed: 31709881
Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):820-6
pubmed: 11012932
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104588
pubmed: 32980608
Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):859-65
pubmed: 16048629