Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
09
2022
accepted:
31
01
2023
entrez:
16
2
2023
pubmed:
17
2
2023
medline:
22
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. A randomized, prospective in vitro study in which three vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol were individually inoculated with known concentrations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans (n = 36) to quantify bacterial and fungal growth was conducted. Over 120 hours, aliquots from contaminated vials were withdrawn, plated, and incubated to determine microbial concentrations. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate free bupivacaine concentrations over time in BLIS. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model with multiple comparisons. Twelve vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol. BLIS did not support significant growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans at any time. BLIS supported significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa beginning at the 24 hour time point. Bupivacaine 0.5% did not support significant growth of any organisms. Propofol supported significant growth of all organisms. Free bupivacaine concentrations changed minimally over time. Bacterial and fungal contaminant growth in artificially inoculated BLIS is organism dependent. BLIS supports significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Extra-label handling of BLIS should only be undertaken with caution and with adherence to strict aseptic technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36795683
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281768
pii: PONE-D-22-26683
pmc: PMC9934369
doi:
Substances chimiques
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Bupivacaine
Y8335394RO
Anesthetics
0
Anesthetics, Local
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0281768Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Wallace et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Vet Rec Open. 2019 Oct 05;6(1):e000233
pubmed: 31673370
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):209-12
pubmed: 9895094
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2021 May;48(3):283-296
pubmed: 33745825
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2000;8(3-4):124-37
pubmed: 10968594
Vet Res Forum. 2013 Summer;4(3):179-83
pubmed: 25653794
Anesth Analg. 1993 Oct;77(4):766-8
pubmed: 8214662
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):290-297
pubmed: 32191688
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Nov;76(3):225-30
pubmed: 20692067
Can J Anaesth. 1992 May;39(5 Pt 1):509-11
pubmed: 1534525
Am J Vet Res. 2015 Sep;76(9):755-62
pubmed: 26309103
Am J Vet Res. 2015 Sep;76(9):763-70
pubmed: 26309104
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;11(12):
pubmed: 34944384
J Small Anim Pract. 2008 Apr;49(4):186-90
pubmed: 18194193
Vet Surg. 2020 May;49(4):772-777
pubmed: 31943286
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;22(6):981-92
pubmed: 27192163
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;18(4):223-233
pubmed: 30186969
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1990 Mar;20(2):419-30
pubmed: 2180187
Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):475-8
pubmed: 8623946
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):205-13
pubmed: 18426354
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2000 Jul;30(4):815-37, vii
pubmed: 10932827
J Surg Res. 2022 Jun;274:16-22
pubmed: 35114483
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 29;110(44):17808-13
pubmed: 24127592
Reg Anesth. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):239-42
pubmed: 8744667