A neurodevelopmental epigenetic programme mediated by SMARCD3-DAB1-Reelin signalling is hijacked to promote medulloblastoma metastasis.
Humans
Extracellular Matrix Proteins
/ genetics
Medulloblastoma
/ genetics
Phosphorylation
Epigenomics
Serine Endopeptidases
/ genetics
Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal
/ genetics
Cerebellar Neoplasms
/ genetics
Epigenesis, Genetic
Nerve Tissue Proteins
/ genetics
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
/ genetics
Journal
Nature cell biology
ISSN: 1476-4679
Titre abrégé: Nat Cell Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100890575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
17
01
2022
accepted:
17
01
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
17
3
2023
entrez:
27
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How abnormal neurodevelopment relates to the tumour aggressiveness of medulloblastoma (MB), the most common type of embryonal tumour, remains elusive. Here we uncover a neurodevelopmental epigenomic programme that is hijacked to induce MB metastatic dissemination. Unsupervised analyses of integrated publicly available datasets with our newly generated data reveal that SMARCD3 (also known as BAF60C) regulates Disabled 1 (DAB1)-mediated Reelin signalling in Purkinje cell migration and MB metastasis by orchestrating cis-regulatory elements at the DAB1 locus. We further identify that a core set of transcription factors, enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) and nuclear factor I X (NFIX), coordinates with the cis-regulatory elements at the SMARCD3 locus to form a chromatin hub to control SMARCD3 expression in the developing cerebellum and in metastatic MB. Increased SMARCD3 expression activates Reelin-DAB1-mediated Src kinase signalling, which results in a MB response to Src inhibition. These data deepen our understanding of how neurodevelopmental programming influences disease progression and provide a potential therapeutic option for patients with MB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36849558
doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01093-0
pii: 10.1038/s41556-023-01093-0
pmc: PMC10014585
doi:
Substances chimiques
Extracellular Matrix Proteins
0
Serine Endopeptidases
EC 3.4.21.-
Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal
0
DAB1 protein, human
0
Nerve Tissue Proteins
0
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
493-507Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS125218
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM133732
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Louis, D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 803–820 (2016).
Zou, H., Poore, B., Broniscer, A., Pollack, I. F. & Hu, B. Molecular heterogeneity and cellular diversity: implications for precision treatment in medulloblastoma. Cancers https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030643 (2020).
Taylor, M. D. et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 123, 465–472 (2012).
pubmed: 22134537
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z
Cavalli, F. M. G. et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 31, 737–754.e6 (2017).
pubmed: 28609654
pmcid: 6163053
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.005
Northcott, P. A. et al. Medulloblastomics: the end of the beginning. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 818–834 (2012).
pubmed: 23175120
pmcid: 3889646
doi: 10.1038/nrc3410
Garzia, L. et al. A hematogenous route for medulloblastoma leptomeningeal metastases. Cell 172, 1050 (2018); erratum 173, 1549 (2018).
Ramaswamy, V. et al. Recurrence patterns across medulloblastoma subgroups: an integrated clinical and molecular analysis. Lancet Oncol. 14, 1200–1207 (2013).
pubmed: 24140199
pmcid: 3953419
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70449-2
Fults, D. W., Taylor, M. D. & Garzia, L. Leptomeningeal dissemination: a sinister pattern of medulloblastoma growth. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.11.PEDS18506 (2019).
Chang, C. H., Housepian, E. M. & Herbert, C. Jr. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology 93, 1351–1359 (1969).
pubmed: 4983156
doi: 10.1148/93.6.1351
Vladoiu, M. C. et al. Childhood cerebellar tumours mirror conserved fetal transcriptional programs. Nature 572, 67–73 (2019).
pubmed: 31043743
pmcid: 6675628
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1158-7
White, J. J. & Sillitoe, R. V. Development of the cerebellum: from gene expression patterns to circuit maps. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 149–164 (2013).
pubmed: 23799634
doi: 10.1002/wdev.65
Butts, T., Green, M. J. & Wingate, R. J. Development of the cerebellum: simple steps to make a ‘little brain’. Development 141, 4031–4041 (2014).
pubmed: 25336734
doi: 10.1242/dev.106559
Sathyanesan, A. et al. Emerging connections between cerebellar development, behaviour and complex brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 298–313 (2019).
pubmed: 30923348
pmcid: 7236620
doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0152-2
Roussel, M. F. & Stripay, J. L. Epigenetic drivers in pediatric medulloblastoma. Cerebellum 17, 28–36 (2018).
pubmed: 29178021
doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0899-9
Weishaupt, H. et al. Batch-normalization of cerebellar and medulloblastoma gene expression datasets utilizing empirically defined negative control genes. Bioinformatics 35, 3357–3364 (2019).
pubmed: 30715209
pmcid: 6748729
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz066
Medvedeva, Y. A. et al. EpiFactors: a comprehensive database of human epigenetic factors and complexes. Database 2015, bav067 (2015).
Northcott, P. A. et al. The whole-genome landscape of medulloblastoma subtypes. Nature 547, 311–317 (2017).
pubmed: 28726821
pmcid: 5905700
doi: 10.1038/nature22973
Hovestadt, V. et al. Resolving medulloblastoma cellular architecture by single-cell genomics. Nature 572, 74–79 (2019).
pubmed: 31341285
pmcid: 6754173
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1434-6
Archer, T. C. et al. Proteomics, post-translational modifications, and integrative analyses reveal molecular heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell 34, 396–410.e8 (2018).
pubmed: 30205044
pmcid: 6372116
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.004
Ivanov, D. P., Coyle, B., Walker, D. A. & Grabowska, A. M. In vitro models of medulloblastoma: choosing the right tool for the job. J. Biotechnol. 236, 10–25 (2016).
pubmed: 27498314
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.028
Venet, D., Dumont, J. E. & Detours, V. Most random gene expression signatures are significantly associated with breast cancer outcome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002240 (2011).
pubmed: 22028643
pmcid: 3197658
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002240
Hanaford, A. R. et al. DiSCoVERing innovative therapies for rare tumors: combining genetically accurate disease models with in silico analysis to identify novel therapeutic targets. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 3903–3914 (2016).
pubmed: 27012813
pmcid: 5055054
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3011
Tissir, F. & Goffinet, A. M. Reelin and brain development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 496–505 (2003).
pubmed: 12778121
doi: 10.1038/nrn1113
Keshvara, L., Benhayon, D., Magdaleno, S. & Curran, T. Identification of Reelin-induced sites of tyrosyl phosphorylation on Disabled 1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16008–16014 (2001).
Breschi, A. et al. Gene-specific patterns of expression variation across organs and species. Genome Biol. 17, 151 (2016).
pubmed: 27391956
pmcid: 4937605
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1008-y
Carter, R. A. et al. A single-cell transcriptional atlas of the developing murine cerebellum. Curr. Biol. 28, 2910–2920.e2 (2018).
pubmed: 30220501
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.062
Leto, K., Carletti, B., Williams, I. M., Magrassi, L. & Rossi, F. Different types of cerebellar GABAergic interneurons originate from a common pool of multipotent progenitor cells. J. Neurosci. 26, 11682–11694 (2006).
pubmed: 17093090
pmcid: 6674781
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-06.2006
Rakic, P. & Sidman, R. L. Histogenesis of cortical layers in human cerebellum, particularly the lamina dissecans. J. Comp. Neurol. 139, 473–500 (1970).
pubmed: 4195699
doi: 10.1002/cne.901390407
Miyata, T. et al. Migration, early axonogenesis, and Reelin-dependent layer-forming behavior of early/posterior-born Purkinje cells in the developing mouse lateral cerebellum. Neural Dev. 5, 23 (2010).
pubmed: 20809939
pmcid: 2942860
doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-5-23
Muller, F. & O’Rahilly, R. The human brain at stages 18–20, including the choroid plexuses and the amygdaloid and septal nuclei. Anat. Embryol. 182, 285–306 (1990).
D’Arcangelo, G. et al. A protein related to extracellular matrix proteins deleted in the mouse mutant reeler. Nature 374, 719–723 (1995).
pubmed: 7715726
doi: 10.1038/374719a0
Rahimi-Balaei, M., Bergen, H., Kong, J. & Marzban, H. Neuronal migration during development of the cerebellum. Front. Cell Neurosci. 12, 484 (2018).
pubmed: 30618631
pmcid: 6304365
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00484
Aldinger, K. A. et al. Spatial and cell type transcriptional landscape of human cerebellar development. Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00872-y (2021).
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
pubmed: 24097267
pmcid: 3959825
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2688
Goodman, J. V. et al. The chromatin remodeling enzyme Chd4 regulates genome architecture in the mouse brain. Nat. Commun. 11, 3419 (2020).
pubmed: 32647123
pmcid: 7347877
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17065-z
Skene, P. J. & Henikoff, S. An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21856 (2017).
Hainer, S. J. & Fazzio, T. G. High-resolution chromatin profiling using CUT&RUN. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 126, e85 (2019).
pubmed: 30688406
pmcid: 6422702
doi: 10.1002/cpmb.85
Boulay, G. et al. OTX2 activity at distal regulatory elements shapes the chromatin landscape of group 3 medulloblastoma. Cancer Discov. 7, 288–301 (2017).
pubmed: 28213356
pmcid: 5340587
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0844
ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Lin, C. Y. et al. Active medulloblastoma enhancers reveal subgroup-specific cellular origins. Nature 530, 57–62 (2016).
pubmed: 26814967
pmcid: 5168934
doi: 10.1038/nature16546
Domcke, S. et al. A human cell atlas of fetal chromatin accessibility. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7612 (2020).
Pliner, H. A. et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol. Cell 71, 858–871.e8 (2018).
pubmed: 30078726
pmcid: 6582963
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044
Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 175, 598–599 (2018).
pubmed: 30290144
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.045
Bock, H. H. & Herz, J. Reelin activates SRC family tyrosine kinases in neurons. Curr. Biol. 13, 18–26 (2003).
pubmed: 12526740
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01403-3
Kuo, G., Arnaud, L., Kronstad-O’Brien, P. & Cooper, J. A. Absence of Fyn and Src causes a reeler-like phenotype. J. Neurosci. 25, 8578–8586 (2005).
pubmed: 16162939
pmcid: 6725670
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1656-05.2005
Sun, X. et al. Cardiac-enriched BAF chromatin-remodeling complex subunit Baf60c regulates gene expression programs essential for heart development and function. Biol. Open https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.029512 (2018).
Lickert, H. et al. Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development. Nature 432, 107–112 (2004).
pubmed: 15525990
doi: 10.1038/nature03071
Jordan, N. V. et al. SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling factor Smarcd3/Baf60c controls epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inducing Wnt5a signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 3011–3025 (2013).
pubmed: 23716599
pmcid: 3719671
doi: 10.1128/MCB.01443-12
Hu, B. et al. Epigenetic activation of WNT5A drives glioblastoma stem cell differentiation and invasive growth. Cell 167, 1281–1295.e18 (2016).
pubmed: 27863244
pmcid: 5320931
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.039
Larouche, M. & Hawkes, R. From clusters to stripes: the developmental origins of adult cerebellar compartmentation. Cerebellum 5, 77–88 (2006).
pubmed: 16818382
doi: 10.1080/14734220600804668
Huq, S. et al. Preclinical efficacy of ribavirin in SHH and group 3 medulloblastoma. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.8.PEDS20561 (2021).
Zhang, H. et al. EZH2 targeting reduces medulloblastoma growth through epigenetic reactivation of the BAI1/p53 tumor suppressor pathway. Oncogene 39, 1041–1048 (2020).
pubmed: 31582835
doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-1036-7
Natsumeda, M. et al. Inhibition of enhancer of zest homologue 2 is a potential therapeutic target for high-MYC medulloblastoma. Neuropathology 39, 71–77 (2019).
pubmed: 30632221
pmcid: 8772614
doi: 10.1111/neup.12534
Alimova, I. et al. Targeting the enhancer of zeste homologue 2 in medulloblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 131, 1800–1809 (2012).
pubmed: 22287205
pmcid: 3375399
doi: 10.1002/ijc.27455
Vo, B. T. et al. Inactivation of Ezh2 upregulates Gfi1 and drives aggressive Myc-driven group 3 medulloblastoma. Cell Rep. 18, 2907–2917 (2017).
pubmed: 28329683
pmcid: 5415387
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.073
Smits, M. et al. EZH2-regulated DAB2IP is a medulloblastoma tumor suppressor and a positive marker for survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 4048–4058 (2012).
pubmed: 22696229
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0399
Xu, H. et al. Integrative analysis reveals the transcriptional collaboration between EZH2 and E2F1 in the regulation of cancer-related gene expression. Mol. Cancer Res. 14, 163–172 (2016).
pubmed: 26659825
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0313
Xu, K. et al. EZH2 oncogenic activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells is Polycomb-independent. Science 338, 1465–1469 (2012).
pubmed: 23239736
pmcid: 3625962
doi: 10.1126/science.1227604
Lee, S. T. et al. Context-specific regulation of NF-κB target gene expression by EZH2 in breast cancers. Mol. Cell 43, 798–810 (2011).
pubmed: 21884980
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.011
Fraser, J. et al. Granule neuron precursor cell proliferation is regulated by NFIX and intersectin 1 during postnatal cerebellar development. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 811–827 (2019).
pubmed: 30511336
doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-1801-3
Piper, M. et al. NFIB-mediated repression of the epigenetic factor Ezh2 regulates cortical development. J. Neurosci. 34, 2921–2930 (2014).
pubmed: 24553933
pmcid: 3931505
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2319-13.2014
Aplenc, R. et al. Pediatric phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib: a report from the children’s oncology group phase I consortium. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 839–844 (2011).
pubmed: 21263099
pmcid: 3068059
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.7231
Broniscer, A. et al. Phase 1 trial, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of dasatinib combined with crizotinib in children with recurrent or progressive high-grade and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 65, e27035 (2018).
pubmed: 29512900
pmcid: 5980705
doi: 10.1002/pbc.27035
Galanis, E. et al. A phase 1 and randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of bevacizumab plus dasatinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Alliance/North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0872. Cancer 125, 3790–3800 (2019).
pubmed: 31290996
doi: 10.1002/cncr.32340
Lu-Emerson, C. et al. Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure. J. Neurooncol. 104, 287–291 (2011).
pubmed: 21153679
doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0489-x
Reardon, D. A. et al. Phase 1 trial of dasatinib plus erlotinib in adults with recurrent malignant glioma. J. Neurooncol. 108, 499–506 (2012).
pubmed: 22407177
pmcid: 3690584
doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0848-x
Patty, B. J. & Hainer, S. J. Transcription factor chromatin profiling genome-wide using uliCUT&RUN in single cells and individual blastocysts. Nat. Protoc. 16, 2633–2666 (2021).
pubmed: 33911257
pmcid: 8177051
doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00516-2
Chen, A. et al. Chitinase-3-like-1 protein complexes modulate macrophage-mediated immune suppression in glioblastoma. J. Clin. Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI147552 (2021).
Goldman, M. J. et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 675–678 (2020).
pubmed: 32444850
pmcid: 7386072
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8