Determining the changes in metabolites of Dendrobium officinale juice fermented with starter cultures containing Saccharomycopsis fibuligera FBKL2.8DCJS1 and Lactobacillus paracasei FBKL1.3028 through untargeted metabolomics.


Journal

BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 03 2023
Historique:
received: 13 11 2022
accepted: 23 02 2023
entrez: 15 3 2023
pubmed: 16 3 2023
medline: 17 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study aimed to investigate the changes in volatile components and metabolites of Dendrobium officinale (D. officinale) juice fermented with starter cultures containing Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and Lactobacillus paracasei at 28 ℃ for 15 days and post-ripened at 4 ℃ for 30 days using untargeted metabolomics of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography (HS-SPME-GC-MS) before and after fermentation. The results showed that the alcohol contents in the S. fibuligera group before fermentation and after fermentation were 444.806 ± 10.310 μg/mL and 510.999 ± 38.431 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the alcohol content in the fermentation broth group inoculated with the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera was 504.758 ± 77.914 μg/mL, containing a significant amount of 3-Methyl-1-butanol, Linalool, Phenylethyl alcohol, and 2-Methyl-1-propanol. Moreover, the Ethyl L (-)-lactate content was higher in the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera group (7.718 ± 6.668 μg/mL) than in the L. paracasei (2.798 ± 0.443 μg/mL) and S. fibuligera monoculture groups (0 μg/mL). The co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera significantly promoted the metabolic production of ethyl L (-)-lactate in D. officinale juice. The differential metabolites screened after fermentation mainly included alcohols, organic acids, amino acids, nucleic acids, and their derivatives. Twenty-three metabolites, including 11 types of acids, were significantly up-regulated in the ten key metabolic pathways of the co-culture group. Furthermore, the metabolic pathways, such as pentose and glucuronate interconversions, the biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from terpenoid and polyketide, and aminobenzoate degradation were significantly up-regulated in the co-culture group. These three metabolic pathways facilitate the synthesis of bioactive substances, such as terpenoids, polyketides, and phenols, and enrich the flavor composition of D. officinale juice. These results demonstrate that the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera can promote the flavor harmonization of fermented products. Therefore, this study provides a theoretical basis for analyzing the flavor of D. officinale juice and the functional investigation of fermentation metabolites.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to investigate the changes in volatile components and metabolites of Dendrobium officinale (D. officinale) juice fermented with starter cultures containing Saccharomycopsis fibuligera and Lactobacillus paracasei at 28 ℃ for 15 days and post-ripened at 4 ℃ for 30 days using untargeted metabolomics of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography (HS-SPME-GC-MS) before and after fermentation.
RESULTS
The results showed that the alcohol contents in the S. fibuligera group before fermentation and after fermentation were 444.806 ± 10.310 μg/mL and 510.999 ± 38.431 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the alcohol content in the fermentation broth group inoculated with the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera was 504.758 ± 77.914 μg/mL, containing a significant amount of 3-Methyl-1-butanol, Linalool, Phenylethyl alcohol, and 2-Methyl-1-propanol. Moreover, the Ethyl L (-)-lactate content was higher in the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera group (7.718 ± 6.668 μg/mL) than in the L. paracasei (2.798 ± 0.443 μg/mL) and S. fibuligera monoculture groups (0 μg/mL). The co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera significantly promoted the metabolic production of ethyl L (-)-lactate in D. officinale juice. The differential metabolites screened after fermentation mainly included alcohols, organic acids, amino acids, nucleic acids, and their derivatives. Twenty-three metabolites, including 11 types of acids, were significantly up-regulated in the ten key metabolic pathways of the co-culture group. Furthermore, the metabolic pathways, such as pentose and glucuronate interconversions, the biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from terpenoid and polyketide, and aminobenzoate degradation were significantly up-regulated in the co-culture group. These three metabolic pathways facilitate the synthesis of bioactive substances, such as terpenoids, polyketides, and phenols, and enrich the flavor composition of D. officinale juice.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate that the co-culture of L. paracasei + S. fibuligera can promote the flavor harmonization of fermented products. Therefore, this study provides a theoretical basis for analyzing the flavor of D. officinale juice and the functional investigation of fermentation metabolites.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36918762
doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02807-y
pii: 10.1186/s12866-023-02807-y
pmc: PMC10012521
doi:

Substances chimiques

Terpenes 0
Acids 0
Lactates 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

67

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Int J Food Microbiol. 2022 May 16;369:109627
pubmed: 35305516
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Aug 15;135:1034-1042
pubmed: 31173832
Food Chem. 2013 Nov 15;141(2):1032-40
pubmed: 23790883
Food Chem. 2023 Mar 15;404(Pt B):134702
pubmed: 36323039
Food Chem. 2022 Aug 30;386:132740
pubmed: 35339083
Nat Protoc. 2011 Jun;6(6):743-60
pubmed: 21637195
J Oleo Sci. 2010;59(8):431-9
pubmed: 20625235
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 06;12:726528
pubmed: 34421620
Food Chem. 2020 May 1;311:125895
pubmed: 31780220
Food Res Int. 2022 Jul;157:111416
pubmed: 35761662
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2020 May 13;26:e00462
pubmed: 32477898
Food Chem. 2022 Jun 1;378:131999
pubmed: 35081481
Food Chem. 2022 Dec 1;396:133666
pubmed: 35841681
Food Chem. 2023 May 30;409:135342
pubmed: 36586262
Metabolomics. 2019 Feb 20;15(3):26
pubmed: 30830485
J Dairy Res. 2013 Feb;80(1):64-71
pubmed: 23186804
J Proteome Res. 2015 Aug 7;14(8):3322-35
pubmed: 26088811
Nat Protoc. 2011 Jun 30;6(7):1060-83
pubmed: 21720319
Curr Res Food Sci. 2022 Feb 25;5:471-478
pubmed: 35252880
J Chromatogr A. 2003 Sep 5;1011(1-2):1-9
pubmed: 14518757
Food Chem. 2022 May 1;375:131839
pubmed: 34968951
Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Feb 2;339:109015
pubmed: 33340944
Genomics. 2022 Jul;114(4):110388
pubmed: 35568110

Auteurs

Wanlin Liu (W)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Xiaoye Luo (X)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. luoxiaoye20172044@126.com.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. luoxiaoye20172044@126.com.
College of Life Sciences, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. luoxiaoye20172044@126.com.

Shuyi Qiu (S)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Wu Huang (W)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Yanan Su (Y)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Linling Li (L)

College of Liquor and Food Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Biophomacy, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

Articles similaires

Animals Rumen Methane Fermentation Cannabis

Metabolic engineering of

Jae Sung Cho, Zi Wei Luo, Cheon Woo Moon et al.
1.00
Corynebacterium glutamicum Metabolic Engineering Dicarboxylic Acids Pyridines Pyrones

Classifications MeSH