Analysis of DNA methylation markers for tissue identification in individuals with different clinical phenotypes.


Journal

Electrophoresis
ISSN: 1522-2683
Titre abrégé: Electrophoresis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8204476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
revised: 14 03 2023
received: 30 06 2022
accepted: 15 03 2023
medline: 13 7 2023
pubmed: 19 3 2023
entrez: 18 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation patterns can be used to identify the type of tissue or body fluid found at a crime scene. However, tissue-related methylation levels have not been analyzed in individuals with different illnesses and medical conditions in forensic-specific studies. The primary goal of this study was to investigate if certain clinical phenotypes can alter the methylation levels of CpG sites in genes involved in tissue typing. Four studies with focus on DNA methylation analysis on individuals with different clinical conditions were selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Then, a list of 137 CpG sites was compiled for further investigation. Statistical tests were performed to compare the beta-values results obtained for the control groups and the individuals affected by medical conditions. For each study, CpG sites that presented significant statistical differences between patients and control group were identified and it was possible to notice that DNA methylation levels can be affected in sites with potential forensic use. Although the observed DNA methylation variation (less than 10% difference) in this study would likely not cause any issues in body fluid identification, the results are important to show that this type of analysis should be taken into consideration when investigating and further validating body fluid markers. The CpG sites identified in this study should be further investigated by future studies on body fluids identification, and due to the significant difference in methylation levels in samples from affected individuals, caution must be taken before including these sites in tissue identification investigations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36934081
doi: 10.1002/elps.202200176
doi:

Substances chimiques

Genetic Markers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1037-1046

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Références

Kader F, Ghai M. DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;249:255-65.
Suzuki M, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:465-76.
Sabeeha, SEH. Forensic epigenetic analysis: the path ahead. Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(4):301-8.
Ghai M, Naidoo N, Evans DL, Kader F. Identification of novel semen and saliva specific methylation markers and its potential application in forensic analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020;49:102392.
Madi T, Balamurugan K, Bombardi R, Duncan G, McCord B. The determination of tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis. 2012;33(12):1736-45.
An JH, Shin KJ, Yang WI, Lee HY. Body fluid identification in forensics. BMB Rep. 2012;45(10):545-53.
Lee HY, Park MJ, Choi A, An JH, Yang WI, Shin KJ. Potential forensic application of DNA methylation profiling to body fluid identification. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(1):55-62.
Lee HY, Jung SE, Lee EH, Yang W, Shin KJ. DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;24:75-82.
Silva DSBS, Antunes J, Balamurugan K, Duncan G, Alho CS, McCord B. Developmental validation studies of epigenetic DNA methylation markers for the detection of blood, semen and saliva samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;23:55-63.
Vidaki A, Giangasparo F, Court DS. Discovery of potential DNA methylation markers for forensic tissue identification using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis. 2016;37(21):2767-79.
Watanabe K, Taniguchi K, Akutsu T. Development of a DNA methylation-based semen-specific SNP typing method: a new approach for genotyping from a mixture of body fluids. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;37:227-34.
Alegría-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics. 2011;3(3):267-77.
Du P, Zhang X, Huang CC, Jafari N, Kibbe WA, Hou L, et al. Comparison of beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:587.
Lee HY, Jung SE, Lee EH, Yang WI, Shin KJ. DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;24:75-82.
Park JL, Kwon OH, Kim JH, Yoo HS, Lee HC, Woo KM, et al. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;13:147-53.
An JH, Choi A, Shin KJ, Yang WI, Lee HY. DNA methylation-specific multiplex assays for body fluid identification. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(1):35-43.
Tian H, Tan Y, Li Z, Peng D, Liang W, Zhang L, et al. Multiplex DNA methylation profiling by ARMS-PCR for body fluid identification. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. 2019;7(1):820-2.
Forat S, Huettel B, Reinhardt R, Fimmers R, Haidl G, Denschlag D, et al. Methylation markers for the identification of body fluids and tissues from forensic trace evidence. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147973.
Fu XD, Wu J, Wang J, Huang Y, Hou YP, Yan J. Identification of body fluid using tissue-specific DNA methylation markers. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. 2015;5:e151-3.
de Winter JCF. Using the Student's t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2013;18:1-12.
Langie SA, Szarc Vel Szic K, Declerck K, Traen S, Koppen G, Van Camp G, et al. Whole-genome saliva and blood DNA methylation profiling in individuals with a respiratory allergy. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151109.
Camilo C, Maschietto M, Vieira HC, Tahira AC, Gouveia GR, Feio Dos Santos AC, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profile in the peripheral blood of cocaine and crack dependents. Braz J Psychiatry. 2019;41(6):485-93.
Pollock RA, Zaman L, Chandran V, Gladman DD. Epigenome-wide analysis of sperm cells identifies IL22 as a possible germ line risk locus for psoriatic arthritis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212043.
Hearn NL, Chiu CL, Lind JM. Comparison of DNA methylation profiles from saliva in coeliac disease and non-coeliac disease individuals. BMC Med Genomics. 2020;13(1):16.
Hearn NL, Coleman AS, Ho V, Chiu CL, Lind JM. Comparing DNA methylation profiles in saliva and intestinal mucosa. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):163.

Auteurs

Deborah S B S Silva (DSBS)

Department of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Haley Ecker (H)

Department of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Johnisa Walcott (J)

Department of Health Professions, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Rebecca Weeden (R)

Department of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Adriana Medina (A)

Department of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Juliette M Gorson (JM)

Biology Department, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Natural Killer T-Cells Mice Adipose Tissue Lipid Metabolism
Humans DNA Methylation Female Male Alcohol Oxidoreductases
Animals Epigenesis, Genetic DNA Methylation Skates, Fish CpG Islands

Classifications MeSH