Urinary cGMP (Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate)/BNP (B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) Ratio, Sacubitril/Valsartan, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial.
Humans
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Guanosine Monophosphate
/ pharmacology
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Tetrazoles
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Valsartan
/ therapeutic use
Enalapril
/ therapeutic use
Aminobutyrates
/ adverse effects
Biphenyl Compounds
/ pharmacology
Drug Combinations
Stroke Volume
B-type natriuretic peptide
angiotensin blocker-neprilysin inhibitor
clinical trial
cyclic guanosine monophosphate
heart failure
Journal
Circulation. Heart failure
ISSN: 1941-3297
Titre abrégé: Circ Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
entrez:
21
3
2023
pubmed:
22
3
2023
medline:
24
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ratio of ucGMP (urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate) to BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) is thought to reflect the responsiveness of tissues to natriuretic peptides. We examined the relationship between ucGMP/BNP ratio and clinical outcomes, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, on the ucGMP/BNP ratio, and the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical outcomes according to baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio in PARADIGM-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). ucGMP/BNP ratio was available at baseline (N=2031), 1 month (N=1959), and 8 months after randomization (N=1746). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Compared with the lowest tertile of baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio, patients in the higher tertiles had a lower risk of the primary outcome (tertile 1, reference; tertile 2, hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.71]; tertile 3, hazard ratio, 0.54 [0.43-0.67]). Compared with baseline, the ucGMP/BNP ratio at 1 month and 8 months after randomization was higher with sacubitril/valsartan than with enalapril: ratio of geometric mean ratios at 1 month, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.27-1.51) and 8 months, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.20-1.45), and this difference was consistent across tertiles of ucGMP/BNP ratio at baseline ( In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, higher ucGMP/BNP ratio was associated with better outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan increased the ucGMP/BNP ratio, compared with enalapril, and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical outcomes was not modified by baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio. URL: https://www. gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01035255.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The ratio of ucGMP (urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate) to BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) is thought to reflect the responsiveness of tissues to natriuretic peptides.
METHODS
We examined the relationship between ucGMP/BNP ratio and clinical outcomes, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, on the ucGMP/BNP ratio, and the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical outcomes according to baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio in PARADIGM-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure). ucGMP/BNP ratio was available at baseline (N=2031), 1 month (N=1959), and 8 months after randomization (N=1746). The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death.
RESULTS
Compared with the lowest tertile of baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio, patients in the higher tertiles had a lower risk of the primary outcome (tertile 1, reference; tertile 2, hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.71]; tertile 3, hazard ratio, 0.54 [0.43-0.67]). Compared with baseline, the ucGMP/BNP ratio at 1 month and 8 months after randomization was higher with sacubitril/valsartan than with enalapril: ratio of geometric mean ratios at 1 month, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.27-1.51) and 8 months, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.20-1.45), and this difference was consistent across tertiles of ucGMP/BNP ratio at baseline (
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, higher ucGMP/BNP ratio was associated with better outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan increased the ucGMP/BNP ratio, compared with enalapril, and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on clinical outcomes was not modified by baseline ucGMP/BNP ratio.
REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01035255.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36943907
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010111
pmc: PMC10022671
doi:
Substances chimiques
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
sacubitril
17ERJ0MKGI
Guanosine Monophosphate
85-32-5
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Tetrazoles
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Valsartan
80M03YXJ7I
Enalapril
69PN84IO1A
Aminobutyrates
0
Biphenyl Compounds
0
Drug Combinations
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01035255']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e010111Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 26;73(11):1264-1272
pubmed: 30846338
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992 Jun;2(12):1697-703
pubmed: 1323337
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:165-171
pubmed: 29544926
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jan 21;117(2):508-519
pubmed: 32167565
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 15;93(6):719-23
pubmed: 15019876
Clin Sci (Lond). 2002 Aug;103 Suppl 48:258S-262S
pubmed: 12193099
Bioorg Med Chem. 2017 Dec 15;25(24):6680-6694
pubmed: 29153628
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;10(2):119-128
pubmed: 35115085
Am J Physiol. 1991 Jun;260(6 Pt 2):F883-9
pubmed: 1647690
Clin Sci (Lond). 1999 Jan;96(1):5-15
pubmed: 9857101
Front Physiol. 2021 Aug 19;12:693099
pubmed: 34489721
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 7;380(6):539-548
pubmed: 30415601
Cardiovasc Res. 2005 Apr 1;66(1):94-103
pubmed: 15769452
Br J Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;113(1):204-8
pubmed: 7812611
J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;41(12):1280-90
pubmed: 11762555
Life Sci. 2002 Oct 25;71(23):2701-12
pubmed: 12383878
Kidney Int. 1996 Nov;50(5):1718-25
pubmed: 8914042
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Dec;67(6):1134-9
pubmed: 2973471
Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Feb;11(2):185-90
pubmed: 19168517
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 10;6(2):
pubmed: 28188250
Eur J Pharmacol. 1998 Apr 24;347(2-3):245-52
pubmed: 9653889
Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:229-43
pubmed: 26473417
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 13;76(15):1795-1807
pubmed: 33032741
Circulation. 1993 Jan;87(1):70-5
pubmed: 8093432
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20;74(7):889-901
pubmed: 31416533
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13;49(10):1079-88
pubmed: 17349888
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
Clin Chem. 2019 Dec;65(12):1602-1603
pubmed: 31362934
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Jan;76(1):91-6
pubmed: 8380606
Circulation. 1997 Jul 15;96(2):509-16
pubmed: 9244219
Int J Cardiol. 1991 Oct;33(1):61-74
pubmed: 1657800
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Sep;15(9):1062-73
pubmed: 23563576
Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):472-6
pubmed: 25799991
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e013149
pubmed: 31838972