Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing in Europe.


Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
received: 05 12 2022
revised: 16 02 2023
accepted: 18 02 2023
medline: 25 4 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The main cause for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is deficiency of the metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended two methods for pre-treatment DPD deficiency testing in clinical practice: phenotyping using endogenous uracil concentration or genotyping for DPYD risk variant alleles. This study assessed the DPD testing implementation status in Europe before (2019) and after (2021) the release of the EMA recommendations. The survey was conducted from 16 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. An electronic form with seven closed and three open questions was e-mailed to 251 professionals with DPD testing expertise of 34 European countries. A descriptive analysis was conducted. We received 79 responses (31%) from 23 countries. Following publication of the EMA recommendations, 87% and 75% of the countries reported an increase in the amount of genotype and phenotype testing, respectively. Implementation of novel local guidelines was reported by 21 responders (27%). Countries reporting reimbursement of both tests increased in 2021, and only four (18%) countries reported no coverage for any testing type. In 2019, major implementation drivers were 'retrospective assessment of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity' (39%), and in 2021, testing was driven by 'publication of guidelines' (40%). Although the major hurdles remained the same after EMA recommendations-'lack of reimbursement' (26%; 2019 versus 15%; 2021) and 'lack of recognizing the clinical relevance by medical oncologists' (25%; 2019 versus 8%; 2021)-the percentage of specialists citing these decreased. Following EMA recommendations, 25% of responders reported no hurdles at all in the adoption of the new testing practice in the clinics. The EMA recommendations have supported the implementation of DPD deficiency testing in Europe. Key factors for successful implementation were test reimbursement and clear clinical guidelines. Further efforts to improve the oncologists' awareness of the clinical relevance of DPD testing in clinical practice are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The main cause for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is deficiency of the metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended two methods for pre-treatment DPD deficiency testing in clinical practice: phenotyping using endogenous uracil concentration or genotyping for DPYD risk variant alleles. This study assessed the DPD testing implementation status in Europe before (2019) and after (2021) the release of the EMA recommendations.
METHODS
The survey was conducted from 16 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. An electronic form with seven closed and three open questions was e-mailed to 251 professionals with DPD testing expertise of 34 European countries. A descriptive analysis was conducted.
RESULTS
We received 79 responses (31%) from 23 countries. Following publication of the EMA recommendations, 87% and 75% of the countries reported an increase in the amount of genotype and phenotype testing, respectively. Implementation of novel local guidelines was reported by 21 responders (27%). Countries reporting reimbursement of both tests increased in 2021, and only four (18%) countries reported no coverage for any testing type. In 2019, major implementation drivers were 'retrospective assessment of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity' (39%), and in 2021, testing was driven by 'publication of guidelines' (40%). Although the major hurdles remained the same after EMA recommendations-'lack of reimbursement' (26%; 2019 versus 15%; 2021) and 'lack of recognizing the clinical relevance by medical oncologists' (25%; 2019 versus 8%; 2021)-the percentage of specialists citing these decreased. Following EMA recommendations, 25% of responders reported no hurdles at all in the adoption of the new testing practice in the clinics.
CONCLUSIONS
The EMA recommendations have supported the implementation of DPD deficiency testing in Europe. Key factors for successful implementation were test reimbursement and clear clinical guidelines. Further efforts to improve the oncologists' awareness of the clinical relevance of DPD testing in clinical practice are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36989883
pii: S2059-7029(23)00419-2
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101197
pmc: PMC10163157
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fluorouracil U3P01618RT
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic 0
Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP) EC 1.3.1.2

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101197

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing Individual participant data collected by the survey, after de-identification, may be provided by the corresponding author on reasonable request to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for the purpose of e.g. meta-analysis, with the permission of the co-authors.

Références

JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Jul;6:e2200180
pubmed: 35862869
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):591-604
pubmed: 33020924
Br J Cancer. 2017 May 23;116(11):1415-1424
pubmed: 28427087
Cancer Lett. 2007 May 8;249(2):271-82
pubmed: 17064846
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):1008-1016
pubmed: 34506675
Per Med. 2014 Mar;11(2):143-153
pubmed: 29751378
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Mar;24(3):483-494
pubmed: 34773566
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467
pubmed: 30348537
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 1;19(21):4097-106
pubmed: 11689577
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Nov 24;150:w20375
pubmed: 33232506
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0175998
pubmed: 28481884
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;112(1):62-68
pubmed: 35397172
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr;28(4):508-517
pubmed: 31745289
Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):135-142
pubmed: 17630036
Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Apr;77(2):346-352
pubmed: 33423619
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 20;34(3):227-34
pubmed: 26573078
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jun;18(6):e958-e965
pubmed: 35239419
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2282-92
pubmed: 11304782
Cancer Res. 1990 Jan 1;50(1):197-201
pubmed: 2293556
Cancer Res. 1992 May 15;52(10):2899-902
pubmed: 1581906
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Nov;1:1-10
pubmed: 35172514
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Oct;112(4):791-802
pubmed: 35607723
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1639-50
pubmed: 26603945
Oncol Res Treat. 2020;43(11):628-636
pubmed: 33099551
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:37-46
pubmed: 31715555
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;103(2):210-216
pubmed: 29152729
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 18;13:885259
pubmed: 35662713

Auteurs

M de With (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

A Sadlon (A)

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital & University of Bern, INO F, Bern, Switzerland.

E Cecchin (E)

Department Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.

V Haufroid (V)

Louvain Center for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

F Thomas (F)

Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole and CRCT, University of Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France.

M Joerger (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Klinik für Medizinische Onkologie & Hämatologie, Kantonsspital, St.Gallen, Switzerland.

R H N van Schaik (RHN)

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

R H J Mathijssen (RHJ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

C R Largiadèr (CR)

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital & University of Bern, INO F, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: Carlo.Largiader@insel.ch.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH