Effect of Longer Family Meals on Children's Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 04 2023
03 04 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Family meals are a formative learning environment that shapes children's food choices and preferences. As such, they are an ideal setting for efforts to improve children's nutritional health. To examine the effect of extending the duration of family meals on the fruit and vegetable intake in children. This randomized clinical trial used a within-dyad manipulation design and was conducted from November 8, 2016, to May 5, 2017, in a family meal laboratory in Berlin, Germany. Included in the trial were children aged 6 to 11 years who did not follow a special diet or have food allergies and adult parents who served as the nutritional gatekeeper in the household (ie, the family member responsible for at least half of the food planning and preparation). All participants underwent 2 conditions: control, defined as regular family mealtime duration, and intervention, defined as 50% longer mealtime duration (10 minutes longer on average). Participants were randomized to the condition they would complete first. Statistical analyses of the full sample were conducted between June 2 and October 30, 2022. Participants had 2 free evening meals under different conditions. In the control or regular condition, each dyad ate in the same amount of time as their reported regular mealtime duration. In the intervention or longer condition, each dyad had 50% more time to eat than their reported regular mealtime duration. The primary outcome was the number of pieces of fruits and vegetables eaten by the child during a meal. A total of 50 parent-child dyads participated in the trial. Parents had a mean (range) age of 43 (28-55 years) years and were predominantly mothers (36 [72%]). Children had a mean (range) age of 8 (6-11) years and included an equal number of girls and boys (25 [50%]). Children ate significantly more pieces of fruits (t49 = 2.36, P = .01; mean difference [MD], 3.32 [95% CI, 0.96 to ∞]; Cohen d = 0.33) and vegetables (t49 = 3.66, P < .001; MD, 4.05 [95% CI, 2.19 to ∞]; Cohen d = 0.52) in the longer condition than in the regular mealtime duration condition. Consumption of bread and cold cuts did not significantly differ between conditions. The children's eating rate (bites per minute over the regular mealtime duration) was significantly lower in the longer than in the regular condition (t49 = -7.60, P < .001; MD, -0.72 [95% CI, -0.56 to ∞]; Cohen d = 1.08). Children reported significantly higher satiety after the longer condition (V = 36.5, P < .001). Results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that the simple, low-threshold intervention of increasing family mealtime duration by approximately 10 minutes can improve the quality of children's diet and eating behavior. The findings underscore the potential for such an intervention to improve public health. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03127579.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37010871
pii: 2802987
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6331
pmc: PMC10071335
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03127579']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e236331Références
JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):912-924
pubmed: 28267855
Appetite. 2022 Apr 1;171:105939
pubmed: 35065143
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):93-9
pubmed: 12081821
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Aug;111(8):1156-64
pubmed: 21802561
Health Psychol. 2019 Dec;38(12):1137-1149
pubmed: 31556657
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 May 10;15:E55
pubmed: 29752802
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134 Suppl 1:S63-9
pubmed: 25183758
Nutrition. 2004 Sep;20(9):821-38
pubmed: 15325695
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Dec;57(12):1569-78
pubmed: 14647222
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 17;12:118
pubmed: 26381609
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jan;24(1):38-48
pubmed: 10702749
Br J Nutr. 2017 Apr;117(7):1042-1051
pubmed: 28462734
Physiol Behav. 1990 Jun;47(6):1129-35
pubmed: 2395917
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):973-986
pubmed: 28792862
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 03;7:30
pubmed: 17608932
Obes Res. 1999 Nov;7(6):564-71
pubmed: 10574515
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 15;14(1):170
pubmed: 29246234
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):133-45
pubmed: 21291433
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Oct 1;110(4):842-861
pubmed: 31435639
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002 May-Jun;34(3):140-50
pubmed: 12047838
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):123-51
pubmed: 24847856
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Apr 21;102(8):529-37
pubmed: 20371762
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010 May;6(5):290-3
pubmed: 20351697
Appetite. 2014 Jul;78:40-8
pubmed: 24656945
Appetite. 2006 Mar;46(2):189-98
pubmed: 16500000
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Apr;99(4):911-7
pubmed: 24477038
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114148
pubmed: 34156451
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1560-6
pubmed: 19064516