Experiences with information blocking in the United States: a national survey of hospitals.
electronic health information
health systems
hospitals
information blocking
interoperability
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
ISSN: 1527-974X
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Inform Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9430800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 05 2023
19 05 2023
Historique:
received:
17
11
2022
revised:
06
03
2023
accepted:
31
03
2023
pmc-release:
08
04
2024
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
9
4
2023
entrez:
8
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule's information blocking provisions, which prohibited practices likely to interfere with, prevent, or materially discourage access, exchange, or use of electronic health information (EHI), began to apply to a limited set of data elements in April 2021 and expanded to all EHI in October 2022. We sought to describe hospital leaders' perceptions of the prevalence of practices that may constitute information blocking, by actor and hospital characteristics, following the rule's applicability date. Cross-sectional analysis of a national survey of hospitals fielded in 2021. The analytic sample included 2092 nonfederal acute care hospitals in the United States. We present descriptive statistics on the perception of the prevalence of information blocking and results of multivariate regression models examining the association between hospital, health information technology (IT) developer and market characteristics and the perception of information blocking. Overall, 42% of hospitals reported observing some behavior they perceived to be information blocking. Thirty-six percent of responding hospitals perceived that healthcare providers either sometimes or often engaged in practices that may constitute information blocking, while 17% and 19% perceived that health IT developers (such as EHR developers) and State, regional and/or local health information exchanges did the same, respectively. Prevalence varied by health IT developer market share, hospital for-profit status, and health system market share. These results support the value of efforts to further reduce friction in the exchange of EHI and support the need for continued observation to provide a sense of the prevalence of information blocking practices and for education and awareness of information blocking regulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37029919
pii: 7111261
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad060
pmc: PMC10198516
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1150-1157Informations de copyright
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2023.
Références
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):727-732
pubmed: 33410891
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar;2(1):26-32
pubmed: 26250086
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1147-1152
pubmed: 29982687
Milbank Q. 2017 Mar;95(1):117-135
pubmed: 28266065
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2129553
pubmed: 34661667
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):736-744
pubmed: 33939510
Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb;55(1):128-135
pubmed: 31721183
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1200-1207
pubmed: 35442438
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Feb 18;3(2):e215199
pubmed: 35977275
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1286-93
pubmed: 27385246
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jun 1;25(6):654-660
pubmed: 29186508
J Health Econ. 2014 Jan;33:28-42
pubmed: 24246484
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3285-3308
pubmed: 29492959
J Med Syst. 2013 Dec;37(6):9987
pubmed: 24141531