The little skate genome and the evolutionary emergence of wing-like fins.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
23
03
2022
accepted:
21
02
2023
medline:
21
4
2023
pubmed:
13
4
2023
entrez:
12
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Skates are cartilaginous fish whose body plan features enlarged wing-like pectoral fins, enabling them to thrive in benthic environments
Identifiants
pubmed: 37046085
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05868-1
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-05868-1
pmc: PMC10115646
doi:
Substances chimiques
Homeodomain Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
495-503Subventions
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE028599
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG003143
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG003988
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Nakamura, T. et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying the exceptional adaptations of batoid fins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15940–15945 (2015).
pubmed: 26644578
pmcid: 4702995
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521818112
Turner, N. et al. The evolutionary origins and diversity of the neuromuscular system of paired appendages in batoids. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20191571 (2019).
pubmed: 31662089
pmcid: 6842844
Shimeld, S. M. & Holland, P. W. Vertebrate innovations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4449–4452 (2000).
pubmed: 10781042
pmcid: 34320
doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4449
Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi5884 (2022).
pubmed: 35108053
pmcid: 8809688
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5884
Touceda-Suárez, M. et al. Ancient genomic regulatory blocks are a source for regulatory gene deserts in vertebrates after whole genome duplications. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa123 (2020).
Marlétaz, F. et al. Amphioxus functional genomics and the origins of vertebrate gene regulation. Nature 564, 64–70 (2018).
pubmed: 30464347
pmcid: 6292497
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0734-6
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
pubmed: 22495300
pmcid: 3356448
doi: 10.1038/nature11082
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
pubmed: 22495304
pmcid: 3555144
doi: 10.1038/nature11049
Berthelot, C., Muffato, M., Abecassis, J. & Roest Crollius, H. The 3D organization of chromatin explains evolutionary fragile genomic regions. Cell Rep. 10, 1913–1924 (2015).
pubmed: 25801028
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.046
Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
pubmed: 25959774
pmcid: 4791538
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004
Real, F. M. et al. The mole genome reveals regulatory rearrangements associated with adaptive intersexuality. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz2582 (2020).
Acemel, R. D. & Gómez-Skarmeta, J. L. Reprogramming nuclear architecture: just a TAD. Cell Stem Cell 24, 679–681 (2019).
pubmed: 31051129
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.04.007
Rowley, M. J. & Corces, V. G. Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 789–800 (2018).
pubmed: 30367165
doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0060-8
Stingo, V. & Rocco, L. Selachian cytogenetics: a review. Genetica 111, 329–347 (2001).
pubmed: 11841178
doi: 10.1023/A:1013747215866
Hirschberger, C., Sleight, V. A., Criswell, K. E., Clark, S. J. & Gillis, J. A. Conserved and unique transcriptional features of pharyngeal arches in the skate (Leucoraja erinacea) and evolution of the jaw. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4187–4204 (2021).
pubmed: 33905525
pmcid: 8476176
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab123
Chorostecki, U., Molina, M., Pryszcz, L. P. & Gabaldón, T. MetaPhOrs 2.0: integrative, phylogeny-based inference of orthology and paralogy across the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W553–W557 (2020).
pubmed: 32343307
pmcid: 7319458
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa282
Fuentes, D. et al. PhylomeDB V5: an expanding repository for genome-wide catalogues of annotated gene phylogenies. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1062–D1068 (2021).
pmcid: 8728271
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab966
Irisarri, I. et al. Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1370–1378 (2017).
pubmed: 28890940
pmcid: 5584656
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0240-5
Hara, Y. et al. Shark genomes provide insights into elasmobranch evolution and the origin of vertebrates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1761–1771 (2018).
pubmed: 30297745
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0673-5
Kuraku, S. Shark and ray genomics for disentangling their morphological diversity and vertebrate evolution. Dev. Biol. 477, 262–272 (2021).
pubmed: 34102168
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.06.001
Duret, L. & Galtier, N. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 10, 285–311 (2009).
pubmed: 19630562
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001
Perry, B. W., Schield, D. R., Adams, R. H. & Castoe, T. A. Microchromosomes exhibit distinct features of vertebrate chromosome structure and function with underappreciated ramifications for genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 904–910 (2021).
pubmed: 32986808
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa253
Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 820–830 (2020).
pubmed: 32313176
pmcid: 7269912
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z
Nakatani, Y., Takeda, H., Kohara, Y. & Morishita, S. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 1254–1265 (2007).
pubmed: 17652425
pmcid: 1950894
doi: 10.1101/gr.6316407
Nakatani, Y. et al. Reconstruction of proto-vertebrate, proto-cyclostome and proto-gnathostome genomes provides new insights into early vertebrate evolution. Nat. Commun. 12, 4489 (2021).
pubmed: 34301952
pmcid: 8302630
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24573-z
Thompson, A. W. et al. The bowfin genome illuminates the developmental evolution of ray-finned fishes. Nat. Genet. 53, 1373–1384 (2021).
pubmed: 34462605
pmcid: 8423624
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00914-y
Dalloul, R. A. et al. Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000475 (2010).
pubmed: 20838655
pmcid: 2935454
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475
Zhang, Y. et al. The white-spotted bamboo shark genome reveals chromosome rearrangements and fast-evolving immune genes of cartilaginous fish. iScience 23, 101754 (2020).
pubmed: 33251490
pmcid: 7677710
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101754
Mitros, T. et al. A chromosome-scale genome assembly and dense genetic map for Xenopus tropicalis. Dev. Biol. 452, 8–20 (2019).
pubmed: 30980799
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.03.015
Hoencamp, C. et al. 3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensin II as a determinant of architecture type. Science 372, 984–989 (2021).
pubmed: 34045355
pmcid: 8172041
doi: 10.1126/science.abe2218
Rowley, M. J. et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Mol. Cell 67, 837–852 (2017).
pubmed: 28826674
pmcid: 5591081
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.022
Acemel, R. D. et al. A single three-dimensional chromatin compartment in amphioxus indicates a stepwise evolution of vertebrate Hox bimodal regulation. Nat. Genet. 48, 336–341 (2016).
pubmed: 26829752
doi: 10.1038/ng.3497
Gibson-Brown, J. J. et al. Evidence of a role for T-box genes in the evolution of limb morphogenesis and the specification of forelimb/hindlimb identity. Mech. Dev. 56, 93–101 (1996).
pubmed: 8798150
doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00514-X
Pradeepa, M. M., Sutherland, H. G., Ule, J., Grimes, G. R. & Bickmore, W. A. Psip1/Ledgf p52 binds methylated histone H3K36 and splicing factors and contributes to the regulation of alternative splicing. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002717 (2012).
pubmed: 22615581
pmcid: 3355077
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002717
Onimaru, K. et al. Developmental hourglass and heterochronic shifts in fin and limb development. eLife 10, e62865 (2021).
pubmed: 33560225
pmcid: 7932699
doi: 10.7554/eLife.62865
Wang, J. S., Infante, C. R., Park, S. & Menke, D. B. PITX1 promotes chondrogenesis and myogenesis in mouse hindlimbs through conserved regulatory targets. Dev. Biol. 434, 186–195 (2018).
pubmed: 29273440
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.12.013
DeLaurier, A., Schweitzer, R. & Logan, M. Pitx1 determines the morphology of muscle, tendon, and bones of the hindlimb. Dev. Biol. 299, 22–34 (2006).
pubmed: 16989801
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.055
Swenson, J. D., Klomp, J., Fisher, R. A. & Crow, K. D. How the devil ray got its horns: the evolution and development of cephalic lobes in myliobatid stingrays (Batoidea: Myliobatidae). Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 181 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00181
Barry, S. N. & Crow, K. D. The role of HoxA11 and HoxA13 in the evolution of novel fin morphologies in a representative batoid (Leucoraja erinacea). Evodevo 8, 24 (2017).
pubmed: 29214009
pmcid: 5709974
doi: 10.1186/s13227-017-0088-4
Lopez-Rios, J. et al. GLI3 constrains digit number by controlling both progenitor proliferation and BMP-dependent exit to chondrogenesis. Dev. Cell 22, 837–848 (2012).
pubmed: 22465667
pmcid: 4486391
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.01.006
Tanaka, M. Fins into limbs: autopod acquisition and anterior elements reduction by modifying gene networks involving 5′Hox, Gli3, and Shh. Dev. Biol. 413, 1–7 (2016).
pubmed: 26992366
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.007
Bastida, M. F. et al. The formation of the thumb requires direct modulation of Gli3 transcription by Hoxa13. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1090–1096 (2020).
pubmed: 31896583
pmcid: 6969497
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919470117
Amin, S. et al. Hoxa2 selectively enhances Meis binding to change a branchial arch ground state. Dev. Cell 32, 265–277 (2015).
pubmed: 25640223
pmcid: 4333904
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.024
Fromental-Ramain, C. et al. Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development 122, 2997–3011 (1996).
pubmed: 8898214
doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.2997
Sheth, R. et al. Distal limb patterning requires modulation of cis-regulatory activities by HOX13. Cell Rep. 17, 2913–2926 (2016).
pubmed: 27974206
pmcid: 5697718
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.039
Nakamura, T., Gehrke, A. R., Lemberg, J., Szymaszek, J. & Shubin, N. H. Digits and fin rays share common developmental histories. Nature 537, 225–228 (2016).
pubmed: 27533041
pmcid: 5161576
doi: 10.1038/nature19322
Freitas, R., Gómez-Marín, C., Wilson, J. M., Casares, F. & Gómez-Skarmeta, J. L. Hoxd13 contribution to the evolution of vertebrate appendages. Dev. Cell 23, 1219–1229 (2012).
pubmed: 23237954
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.015
Letelier, J. et al. The Shh/Gli3 gene regulatory network precedes the origin of paired fins and reveals the deep homology between distal fins and digits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100575118 (2021).
pubmed: 34750251
pmcid: 8673081
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100575118
Bogdanović, O. et al. Active DNA demethylation at enhancers during the vertebrate phylotypic period. Nat. Genet. 48, 417–426 (2016).
pubmed: 26928226
pmcid: 5912259
doi: 10.1038/ng.3522
Hon, G. C. et al. Epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers identified in DNA methylation maps from adult mouse tissues. Nat. Genet. 45, 1198–1206 (2013).
pubmed: 23995138
pmcid: 4095776
doi: 10.1038/ng.2746
Kragesteen, B. K. et al. Dynamic 3D chromatin architecture contributes to enhancer specificity and limb morphogenesis. Nat. Genet. 50, 1463–1473 (2018).
pubmed: 30262816
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0221-x
Venkatesh, B. et al. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature 505, 174–179 (2014).
pubmed: 24402279
pmcid: 3964593
doi: 10.1038/nature12826
Krefting, J., Andrade-Navarro, M. A. & Ibn-Salem, J. Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation. BMC Biol. 16, 87 (2018).
pubmed: 30086749
pmcid: 6091198
doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0556-x
Schenkelaars, Q., Fierro-Constain, L., Renard, E. & Borchiellini, C. Retracing the path of planar cell polarity. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 69 (2016).
pubmed: 27039172
pmcid: 4818920
doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0641-0
Maxwell, E. E., Fröbisch, N. B. & Heppleston, A. C. Variability and conservation in late chondrichthyan development: ontogeny of the winter skate (Leucoraja ocellata). Anat. Rec. 291, 1079–1087 (2008).
doi: 10.1002/ar.20719
Carrier, J. C., Musick, J. A. & Heithaus, M. R. Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives 2nd edn (CRC Press, 2012).
Kvon, E. Z. et al. Progressive loss of function in a limb enhancer during snake evolution. Cell 167, 633–642 (2016).
pubmed: 27768887
pmcid: 5484524
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.028
Leal, F. & Cohn, M. J. Loss and re-emergence of legs in snakes by modular evolution of Sonic hedgehog and HOXD enhancers. Curr. Biol. 26, 2966–2973 (2016).
pubmed: 27773569
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.020
Lopez-Rios, J. et al. Attenuated sensing of SHH by Ptch1 underlies evolution of bovine limbs. Nature 511, 46–51 (2014).
pubmed: 24990743
doi: 10.1038/nature13289
Enny, A., Flaherty, K., Mori, S., Turner, N. & Nakamura, T. Developmental constraints on fin diversity. Dev. Growth Differ. 62, 311–325 (2020).
pubmed: 32396685
pmcid: 7383993
doi: 10.1111/dgd.12670
Gehrke, A. R. et al. Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 803–808 (2015).
pubmed: 25535365
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420208112
Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S. & Schatz, M. C. GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1432 (2020).
pubmed: 32188846
pmcid: 7080791
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14998-3
Ye, C., Hill, C. M., Wu, S., Ruan, J. & Ma, Z. S. DBG2OLC: efficient assembly of large genomes using long erroneous reads of the third generation sequencing technologies. Sci. Rep. 6, 31900 (2016).
pubmed: 27573208
pmcid: 5004134
doi: 10.1038/srep31900
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
pubmed: 29750242
pmcid: 6137996
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
pubmed: 26059717
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351
Roach, M. J., Schmidt, S. A. & Borneman, A. R. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinform. 19, 460 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7
Putnam, N. H. et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 26, 342–350 (2016).
pubmed: 26848124
pmcid: 4772016
doi: 10.1101/gr.193474.115
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).
pubmed: 28336562
pmcid: 5635820
doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327
Kerpedjiev, P. et al. HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 19, 125 (2018).
pubmed: 30143029
pmcid: 6109259
doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1
English, A. C. et al. Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 7, e47768 (2012).
pubmed: 23185243
pmcid: 3504050
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047768
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
pubmed: 25690850
pmcid: 4643835
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122
Niknafs, Y. S., Pandian, B., Iyer, H. K., Chinnaiyan, A. M. & Iyer, M. K. TACO produces robust multisample transcriptome assemblies from RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 68–70 (2017).
pubmed: 27869815
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4078
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).
pubmed: 21572440
pmcid: 3571712
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883
Wu, T. D., Reeder, J., Lawrence, M., Becker, G. & Brauer, M. J. GMAP and GSNAP for genomic sequence alignment: enhancements to speed, accuracy, and functionality. Methods Mol. Biol. 1418, 283–334 (2016).
pubmed: 27008021
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3578-9_15
Venturini, L., Caim, S., Kaithakottil, G. G., Mapleson, D. L. & Swarbreck, D. Leveraging multiple transcriptome assembly methods for improved gene structure annotation. Gigascience 7, giy093 (2018).
pubmed: 30052957
pmcid: 6105091
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy093
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
pubmed: 16845043
pmcid: 1538822
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200
Mapleson, D., Venturini, L., Kaithakottil, G. & Swarbreck, D. Efficient and accurate detection of splice junctions from RNA-seq with Portcullis. Gigascience 7, giy131 (2018).
pubmed: 30418570
pmcid: 6302956
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy131
Slater, G. S. C. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinform. 6, 31 (2005).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-31
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
pubmed: 18190707
pmcid: 2395244
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7
Roth, A. C. J., Gonnet, G. H. & Dessimoz, C. Algorithm of OMA for large-scale orthology inference. BMC Bioinform. 9, 518 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-518
Marlétaz, F., Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A., Goto, T., Satoh, N. & Rokhsar, D. S. A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among gnathiferans. Curr. Biol. 29, 312–318 (2019).
pubmed: 30639106
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.042
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
pubmed: 22039361
pmcid: 3197634
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K.-I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).
pubmed: 12136088
pmcid: 135756
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
pubmed: 20626897
pmcid: 3017758
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210
Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286–2288 (2009).
pubmed: 19535536
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368
Benton, M. J., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Asher, R. J. in The Timetree Of Life (ed. Kumar, S. B. H.) 35–86 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
pubmed: 29035372
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3988
Derelle, R., Philippe, H. & Colbourne, J. K. Broccoli: combining phylogenetic and network analyses for orthology assignment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 3389–3396 (2020).
pubmed: 32602888
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa159
Morel, B., Kozlov, A. M., Stamatakis, A. & Szöllősi, G. J. GeneRax: a tool for species-tree-aware maximum likelihood-based gene family tree inference under gene duplication, transfer, and loss. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 2763–2774 (2020).
pubmed: 32502238
pmcid: 8312565
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa141
Belaghzal, H., Dekker, J. & Gibcus, J. H. Hi-C 2.0: an optimized Hi-C procedure for high-resolution genome-wide mapping of chromosome conformation. Methods 123, 56–65 (2017).
pubmed: 28435001
pmcid: 5522765
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.04.004
Franke, M. et al. CTCF knockout in zebrafish induces alterations in regulatory landscapes and developmental gene expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5415 (2021).
pubmed: 34518536
pmcid: 8438036
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25604-5
Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
pubmed: 25497547
pmcid: 5635824
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 2705234
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249
pmcid: 5846465
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Kruse, K., Hug, C. B. & Vaquerizas, J. M. FAN-C: a feature-rich framework for the analysis and visualisation of chromosome conformation capture data. Genome Biol. 21, 303 (2020).
pubmed: 33334380
pmcid: 7745377
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02215-9
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278
pmcid: 2832824
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Crane, E. et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 523, 240–244 (2015).
pubmed: 26030525
pmcid: 4498965
doi: 10.1038/nature14450
Frith, M. C. et al. Detection of functional DNA motifs via statistical over-representation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1372–1381 (2004).
pubmed: 14988425
pmcid: 390287
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh299
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018 (2011).
pubmed: 21330290
pmcid: 3065696
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064
Barrows, T. C. A. profileplyr (Bioconductor, 2019); https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.BIOC.PROFILEPLYR
Wolff, J., Backofen, R. & Grüning, B. Loop detection using Hi-C data with HiCExplorer. Gigascience 11, giac061 (2022).
pubmed: 35809047
pmcid: 9270730
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac061
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
pubmed: 19910308
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
Mumbach, M. R. et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nat. Methods 13, 919–922 (2016).
pubmed: 27643841
pmcid: 5501173
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3999
Serra, F. et al. Automatic analysis and 3D-modelling of Hi-C data using TADbit reveals structural features of the fly chromatin colors. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005665 (2017).
pubmed: 28723903
pmcid: 5540598
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005665
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982
pmcid: 2592715
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
Bhattacharyya, S., Chandra, V., Vijayanand, P. & Ay, F. Identification of significant chromatin contacts from HiChIP data by FitHiChIP. Nat. Commun. 10, 4221 (2019).
pubmed: 31530818
pmcid: 6748947
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11950-y
Lawrence, M. et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003118 (2013).
pubmed: 23950696
pmcid: 3738458
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118
Ewels, P. A. et al. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 276–278 (2020).
pubmed: 32055031
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Alexa, A. & Rahnenfuhrer, J. topGO; https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.BIOC.TOPGO (Bioconductor, 2017).
Fernández-Miñán, A., Bessa, J., Tena, J. J. & Gómez-Skarmeta, J. L. Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin and circularized chromosome conformation capture, two methods to explore the regulatory landscapes of genes in zebrafish. Methods Cell. Biol. 135, 413–430 (2016).
pubmed: 27443938
doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.02.008
Di Tommaso, P. et al. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 316–319 (2017).
pubmed: 28398311
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3820
Irimia, M. et al. Extensive conservation of ancient microsynteny across metazoans due to cis-regulatory constraints. Genome Res. 22, 2356–2367 (2012).
pubmed: 22722344
pmcid: 3514665
doi: 10.1101/gr.139725.112
Harris, R. S. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State Univ. (2007).
Hiller, M. et al. Computational methods to detect conserved non-genic elements in phylogenetically isolated genomes: application to zebrafish. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e151 (2013).
pubmed: 23814184
pmcid: 3753653
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt557
Kent, W. J., Baertsch, R., Hinrichs, A., Miller, W. & Haussler, D. Evolution’s cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11484–11489 (2003).
pubmed: 14500911
pmcid: 208784
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1932072100
Suarez, H. G., Langer, B. E., Ladde, P. & Hiller, M. chainCleaner improves genome alignment specificity and sensitivity. Bioinformatics 33, 1596–1603 (2017).
pubmed: 28108446
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx024
Yu, G. & He, Q.-Y. ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol. Biosyst. 12, 477–479 (2016).
pubmed: 26661513
doi: 10.1039/C5MB00663E
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).
pubmed: 22455463
pmcid: 3339379
doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Dahn, R. D., Davis, M. C., Pappano, W. N. & Shubin, N. H. Sonic hedgehog function in chondrichthyan fins and the evolution of appendage patterning. Nature 445, 311–314 (2006).
pubmed: 17187056
doi: 10.1038/nature05436
Olsen, A. M. & Westneat, M. W. StereoMorph: an R package for the collection of 3D landmarks and curves using a stereo camera set‐up. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 351–356 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12326
Baken, E. K., Collyer, M. L., Kaliontzopoulou, A. & Adams, D. C. geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 2355–2363 (2021).
Adams, D., Collyer, M., Kaliontzopoulou, A. & Baken, E. geomorph: geometric morphometric analyses of 2D/3D landmark data. R package version 4.0.1 (2021).
Suster, M. L., Abe, G., Schouw, A. & Kawakami, K. Transposon-mediated BAC transgenesis in zebrafish. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1998–2021 (2011).
pubmed: 22134125
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.416
Huerta-Cepas, J., Capella-Gutierrez, S., Pryszcz, L. P., Marcet-Houben, M. & Gabaldon, T. PhylomeDB v4: zooming into the plurality of evolutionary histories of a genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D897–D902 (2014).
pubmed: 24275491
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1177
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
pubmed: 15034147
pmcid: 390337
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. & Miyata, T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511–518 (2005).
pubmed: 15661851
pmcid: 548345
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki198
Lassmann, T. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Kalign—an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinform. 6, 298 (2005).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-298
Wallace, I. M., O’Sullivan, O., Higgins, D. G. & Notredame, C. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 1692–1699 (2006).
pubmed: 16556910
pmcid: 1410914
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl091
Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
pubmed: 19505945
pmcid: 2712344
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
pubmed: 25371430
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300
Wehe, A., Bansal, M. S., Burleigh, J. G. & Eulenstein, O. DupTree: a program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics 24, 1540–1541 (2008).
pubmed: 18474508
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn230
Urich, M. A., Nery, J. R., Lister, R., Schmitz, R. J. & Ecker, J. R. MethylC-seq library preparation for base-resolution whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 10, 475–483 (2015).
pubmed: 25692984
pmcid: 4465251
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.114
Peat, J. R., Ortega-Recalde, O., Kardailsky, O. & Hore, T. A. The elephant shark methylome reveals conservation of epigenetic regulation across jawed vertebrates. F1000Research 6, 526 (2017).
pubmed: 28580133
pmcid: 5437953
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11281.1
Skvortsova, K. et al. Retention of paternal DNA methylome in the developing zebrafish germline. Nat. Commun. 10, 3054 (2019).
pubmed: 31296860
pmcid: 6624265
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10895-6
Chen, H., Smith, A. D. & Chen, T. WALT: fast and accurate read mapping for bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics 32, 3507–3509 (2016).
pubmed: 27466624
pmcid: 5181568
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw490
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014).
pubmed: 24799436
pmcid: 4086134
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku365