Cost-effectiveness of Prednisolone to Treat Bell Palsy in Children: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 06 2023
13 06 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
accepted:
27
02
2023
pmc-release:
13
06
2024
medline:
14
6
2023
pubmed:
19
4
2023
entrez:
18
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bell palsy is the third most frequent diagnosis in children with sudden-onset neurologic dysfunction. The cost-effectiveness of treating Bell palsy with prednisolone in children is unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of prednisolone in treating Bell palsy in children compared with placebo. This economic evaluation was a prospectively planned secondary analysis of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial (Bell Palsy in Children [BellPIC]) conducted from 2015 to 2020. The time horizon was 6 months since randomization. Children aged 6 months to <18 years who presented within 72 hours of onset of clinician-diagnosed Bell palsy and who completed the trial were included (N = 180). Interventions were oral prednisolone or taste-matched placebo administered for 10 days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing prednisolone with placebo was estimated. Costs were considered from a health care sector perspective and included Bell palsy-related medication cost, doctor visits, and medical tests. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on Child Health Utility 9D. Nonparametric bootstrapping was performed to capture uncertainties. Prespecified subgroup analysis by age 12 to <18 years vs <12 years was conducted. The mean cost per patient was A$760 in the prednisolone group and A$693 in the placebo group over the 6-month period (difference A$66, 95% CI -A$47 to A$179). QALYs over 6 months were 0.45 in the prednisolone group and 0.44 in the placebo group (difference 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03). The incremental cost to achieve 1 additional recovery was estimated to be A$1,577 using prednisolone compared with placebo, and cost per additional QALY gained was A$6,625 using prednisolone compared with placebo. Given a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000 per QALY gained (equivalent to US$35,000 or £28,000), prednisolone is very likely cost-effective (probability is 83%). Subgroup analysis suggests that this was primarily driven by the high probability of prednisolone being cost-effective in children aged 12 to <18 years (probability is 98%) and much less so for those <12 years (probability is 51%). This provides new evidence to stakeholders and policymakers when considering whether to make prednisolone available in treating Bell palsy in children aged 12 to <18 years. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000563561.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Bell palsy is the third most frequent diagnosis in children with sudden-onset neurologic dysfunction. The cost-effectiveness of treating Bell palsy with prednisolone in children is unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of prednisolone in treating Bell palsy in children compared with placebo.
METHODS
This economic evaluation was a prospectively planned secondary analysis of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial (Bell Palsy in Children [BellPIC]) conducted from 2015 to 2020. The time horizon was 6 months since randomization. Children aged 6 months to <18 years who presented within 72 hours of onset of clinician-diagnosed Bell palsy and who completed the trial were included (N = 180). Interventions were oral prednisolone or taste-matched placebo administered for 10 days. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing prednisolone with placebo was estimated. Costs were considered from a health care sector perspective and included Bell palsy-related medication cost, doctor visits, and medical tests. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on Child Health Utility 9D. Nonparametric bootstrapping was performed to capture uncertainties. Prespecified subgroup analysis by age 12 to <18 years vs <12 years was conducted.
RESULTS
The mean cost per patient was A$760 in the prednisolone group and A$693 in the placebo group over the 6-month period (difference A$66, 95% CI -A$47 to A$179). QALYs over 6 months were 0.45 in the prednisolone group and 0.44 in the placebo group (difference 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03). The incremental cost to achieve 1 additional recovery was estimated to be A$1,577 using prednisolone compared with placebo, and cost per additional QALY gained was A$6,625 using prednisolone compared with placebo. Given a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000 per QALY gained (equivalent to US$35,000 or £28,000), prednisolone is very likely cost-effective (probability is 83%). Subgroup analysis suggests that this was primarily driven by the high probability of prednisolone being cost-effective in children aged 12 to <18 years (probability is 98%) and much less so for those <12 years (probability is 51%).
DISCUSSION
This provides new evidence to stakeholders and policymakers when considering whether to make prednisolone available in treating Bell palsy in children aged 12 to <18 years.
TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000563561.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37072220
pii: WNL.0000000000207284
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207284
pmc: PMC10264054
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prednisolone
9PHQ9Y1OLM
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2432-e2441Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12
pubmed: 11468499
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1018-1029
pubmed: 35667775
Fam Pract. 2009 Apr;26(2):137-44
pubmed: 19244470
Lancet. 2008 May 31;371(9627):1818-20
pubmed: 18514714
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985 Apr;93(2):146-7
pubmed: 3921901
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):239-252
pubmed: 29273843
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103
pubmed: 27623463
Qual Health Res. 2010 Mar;20(3):340-51
pubmed: 20054040
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;187:106-8
pubmed: 16055820
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):
pubmed: 32751746
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Apr;18(2):143-7
pubmed: 16669940
Laryngoscope. 1988 May;98(5):535-40
pubmed: 3362016
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1103-9
pubmed: 11735677
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):993-1000
pubmed: 18849193
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142709
pubmed: 35072722
BMJ. 1990 Jan 27;300(6719):230-5
pubmed: 2106931
Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):639-652
pubmed: 31745690
Neurology. 2022 Aug 25;:
pubmed: 36008143
Eur J Neurol. 2002 Jan;9(1):63-7
pubmed: 11784378
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2005;4(2):65-75
pubmed: 16162026
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):53
pubmed: 28193257
Pediatr Neurol. 1999 Nov;21(5):814-6
pubmed: 10593672
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Nov;149(3 Suppl):S1-27
pubmed: 24189771
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jul;76(7):921-6
pubmed: 22503409
Laryngoscope. 2008 Sep;118(9):1556-60
pubmed: 18677272
Neurology. 2014 Apr 22;82(16):1434-40
pubmed: 24658929
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):713-27
pubmed: 22788261
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Mar;50(3):245-6
pubmed: 24674252
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 18;357(16):1598-607
pubmed: 17942873
BMJ. 2022 Jan 11;376:e067975
pubmed: 35017145