Beta-Blocker Use and Heart Failure Outcomes in Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction.


Journal

JACC. Heart failure
ISSN: 2213-1787
Titre abrégé: JACC Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101598241

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 03 01 2023
revised: 27 03 2023
accepted: 28 03 2023
medline: 11 8 2023
pubmed: 4 5 2023
entrez: 4 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although studies consistently show that beta-blockers reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF), data are inconsistent in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and suggest potential negative effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The purpose of this study was to examine the association of beta-blockers with heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death in patients with HF and EF ≥40% METHODS: Beta-blocker use was assessed at first encounter in outpatients ≥65 years of age with HFmrEF and HFpEF in the U.S. PINNACLE Registry (2013-2017). The associations of beta-blockers with HF hospitalization, death, and the composite of HF hospitalization/death were assessed using propensity-score adjusted multivariable Cox regression models, including interactions of EF × beta-blocker use. Among 435,897 patients with HF and EF ≥40% (HFmrEF, n = 75,674; HFpEF = 360,223), 289,377 (66.4%) were using a beta-blocker at first encounter; more commonly in patients with HFmrEF vs HFpEF (77.7% vs 64.0%; P < 0.001). There were significant interactions between EF × beta-blocker use for HF hospitalization, death, and composite of HF hospitalization/death (P < 0.001 for all), with higher risk with beta-blocker use as EF increased. Beta-blockers were associated with decreased risk of HF hospitalization and death in patients with HFmrEF but a lack of survival benefit and a higher risk of HF hospitalization in patients with HFpEF, particularly when EF was >60%. In a large, real-world, propensity score-adjusted cohort of older outpatients with HF and EF ≥40%, beta-blocker use was associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization as EF increased, with potential benefit in patients with HFmrEF and potential risk in patients with higher EF (particularly >60%). Further studies are needed to understand the appropriateness of beta-blocker use in patients with HFpEF in the absence of compelling indications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although studies consistently show that beta-blockers reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF), data are inconsistent in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and suggest potential negative effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to examine the association of beta-blockers with heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death in patients with HF and EF ≥40% METHODS: Beta-blocker use was assessed at first encounter in outpatients ≥65 years of age with HFmrEF and HFpEF in the U.S. PINNACLE Registry (2013-2017). The associations of beta-blockers with HF hospitalization, death, and the composite of HF hospitalization/death were assessed using propensity-score adjusted multivariable Cox regression models, including interactions of EF × beta-blocker use.
RESULTS
Among 435,897 patients with HF and EF ≥40% (HFmrEF, n = 75,674; HFpEF = 360,223), 289,377 (66.4%) were using a beta-blocker at first encounter; more commonly in patients with HFmrEF vs HFpEF (77.7% vs 64.0%; P < 0.001). There were significant interactions between EF × beta-blocker use for HF hospitalization, death, and composite of HF hospitalization/death (P < 0.001 for all), with higher risk with beta-blocker use as EF increased. Beta-blockers were associated with decreased risk of HF hospitalization and death in patients with HFmrEF but a lack of survival benefit and a higher risk of HF hospitalization in patients with HFpEF, particularly when EF was >60%.
CONCLUSIONS
In a large, real-world, propensity score-adjusted cohort of older outpatients with HF and EF ≥40%, beta-blocker use was associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization as EF increased, with potential benefit in patients with HFmrEF and potential risk in patients with higher EF (particularly >60%). Further studies are needed to understand the appropriateness of beta-blocker use in patients with HFpEF in the absence of compelling indications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37140513
pii: S2213-1779(23)00173-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.03.017
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

893-900

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures The PINNACLE Registry is part of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and is managed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and Veradigm. The sponsors of the registry had no role in data analysis or interpretation, manuscript development, publication review, or approval for this study. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Suzanne V Arnold (SV)

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: sarnold@saint-lukes.org.

Daniel N Silverman (DN)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Kensey Gosch (K)

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Michael E Nassif (ME)

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Margaret Infeld (M)

Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Sheldon Litwin (S)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Markus Meyer (M)

Lillehei Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota College of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Timothy J Fendler (TJ)

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH