Impact of chlorine or peracetic acid on inactivation of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in agricultural water.


Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 03 03 2023
revised: 27 04 2023
accepted: 27 04 2023
medline: 9 6 2023
pubmed: 5 5 2023
entrez: 4 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Preharvest agricultural water has been recognized as one of the routes of contamination for foodborne pathogens during fruit and vegetable production. Several strategies have been proposed to reduce the risk of pathogens, including preharvest water chemigation, but literature is lacking with regards to microbiological inactivation of common bacterial foodborne pathogens associated with fresh produce contamination, Salmonella enterica, Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC), and Listeria monocytogenes, in surface irrigation water after exposure to chlorine and peracetic acid (PAA). Surface water supplied by a local irrigation district was collected over the summer of 2019. Water was autoclaved, divided into 100 mL samples, and inoculated with a cocktail of five Salmonella, STEC, or Listeria monocytogenes strains or a single strain non-pathogenic E. coli. Samples were then treated with 3, 5, or 7 ppm of free chlorine or PAA, and surviving populations were evaluated using a time-kill assay. A first-order kinetic model was used to fit the inactivation data and obtain the D-values. A secondary model was used to explain the changes due to the type of water, treatment, and microorganism. At a concentration of 3 ppm, the observed and predicted D-values of free chlorine treatments were higher than that of PAA treatments for ground and surface water. Results indicated that PAA was more effective inactivating bacteria than sodium hypochlorite at concentrations of 3 and 5 ppm for both water sources (surface and ground). However, at 7 ppm, the effectiveness of PAA and sodium hypochlorite showed no statistically significant difference for both surface and groundwater. Findings will provide information regarding efficacy of chemical sanitizers like chlorine and PAA for inactivation of Salmonella, Listeria, and STEC in surface water from which treatments can be derived. Ultimately benefitting growers in the selection of an appropriate method for in-field treatment of irrigation water if deemed necessary.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37142011
pii: S0048-9697(23)02505-6
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163884
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Peracetic Acid I6KPI2E1HD
Chlorine 4R7X1O2820
Water 059QF0KO0R
Disinfectants 0
Sodium Hypochlorite DY38VHM5OD
Chlorides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

163884

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Anjali Krishnan (A)

School of Food Science and Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, United States.

Xinran Xu (X)

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Martha Sanchez Tamayo (MS)

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Abhinav Mishra (A)

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Faith Critzer (F)

School of Food Science and Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA, United States. Electronic address: fcritzer@uga.edu.

Articles similaires

Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil
Wetlands Massachusetts Chlorides Groundwater Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH