The development and phase 1 evaluation of a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing.

Decision Aid Decision support Elective egg freezing Fertility preservation Information Phase 1 Planned oocyte cryopreservation

Journal

BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 05 2023
Historique:
received: 15 09 2022
accepted: 21 04 2023
medline: 8 5 2023
pubmed: 6 5 2023
entrez: 5 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making. The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18-45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility. Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance  it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45-80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0-37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7-11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10-12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01). This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial. ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Elective egg freezing decisions are complex. We developed a Decision Aid for elective egg freezing and conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate its acceptability and utility for decision-making.
METHODS
The online Decision Aid was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards and evaluated using a pre/post survey design. Twenty-six Australian women aged 18-45 years, interested in receiving elective egg freezing information, proficient in English, and with access to the internet were recruited using social media and university newsletters. Main outcomes were: acceptability of the Decision Aid; feedback on the Decision Aid design and content; concern raised by the Decision Aid, and; utility of the Decision Aid as measured by scores on the Decisional Conflict Scale and on a study-specific scale assessing knowledge about egg freezing and age-related infertility.
RESULTS
Most participants found the Decision Aid acceptable (23/25), balanced (21/26), useful for explaining their options (23/26), and for reaching a decision (18/26). Almost all reported satisfaction with the Decision Aid (25/26) and the level of guidance  it provided (25/26). No participant reported serious concerns about the Decision Aid, and most would recommend it to other women considering elective egg freezing (22/26). Median Decisional Conflict Scale score decreased from 65/100 (Interquartile range: 45-80) pre-Decision Aid to 7.5/100 (Interquartile range: 0-37.5) post-Decision Aid review (p < 0.001). Median knowledge score increased from 8.5/14 (Interquartile range: 7-11) pre-Decision Aid to 11/14 (Interquartile range: 10-12) post-Decision Aid review (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
This elective egg freezing Decision Aid appears acceptable and useful for decision-making. It improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and did not raise serious concerns. The Decision Aid will be further evaluated using a prospective randomised control trial.
STUDY REGISTRATION
ACTRN12618001685202 (retrospectively registered: 12 October 2018).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37147687
doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4
pii: 10.1186/s12911-023-02178-4
pmc: PMC10161420
doi:

Banques de données

ANZCTR
['ACTRN12618001685202']

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

83

Investigateurs

William Ledger (W)
Jane Fisher (J)
Louise Johnson (L)
Janet Michelmore (J)
Fiona Summers (F)
Roger Hart (R)
Robert J Norman (RJ)
Devora Lieberman (D)
Richard A Anderson (RA)

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1623-1630
pubmed: 30006788
Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1044-7
pubmed: 22386844
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019 Dec;22(4):283-290
pubmed: 30058411
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jun;18(6):769-76
pubmed: 19490780
Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):502-7
pubmed: 23158832
Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Aug 25;2021(4):hoab031
pubmed: 34532596
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Sep;102(9):1695-1702
pubmed: 31003877
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Feb;42(2):442-450
pubmed: 33246804
Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1996-2000
pubmed: 21406304
Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):492-9.e3
pubmed: 23706339
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Nov 04;12:44-55
pubmed: 33336089
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017 Jun;20(2):88-95
pubmed: 27778517
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Dec;43(6):1137-1145
pubmed: 34686418
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):712-7
pubmed: 23721713
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Feb;40(2):207-214
pubmed: 31983546
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):633-4
pubmed: 24559617
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2021 Aug 22;:1-10
pubmed: 34423731
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):211-7
pubmed: 23691734
Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1097-1104.e1
pubmed: 29807657
Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2239-46
pubmed: 21659314
Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;110(6):1022-1028
pubmed: 30396539
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Jun;30(5):691-7
pubmed: 23558770
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Jun;26(6):595-602
pubmed: 23602678
Breast J. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):112-4
pubmed: 21129095
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019 Dec;22(4):291-299
pubmed: 29989473
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Nov 21;12:56-68
pubmed: 33336090
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):575-581
pubmed: 28077428
Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):1077-1084
pubmed: 34303511
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Dec 10;2019(4):hoz025
pubmed: 31844683
J Genet Couns. 2007 Jun;16(3):325-39
pubmed: 17318456
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Aug;29(8):789-95
pubmed: 22614160
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):64-72
pubmed: 20580521
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100(3):383-393
pubmed: 33078391
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Mar;99(3):324-332
pubmed: 31667820
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1758441
pubmed: 32458753
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Mar;42(3):564-571
pubmed: 33402254
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012 Apr 27;10:35
pubmed: 22541043
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):190-4
pubmed: 20097467
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):301-314
pubmed: 31142194
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jun 7;3:31
pubmed: 28603643
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):624-635
pubmed: 33367704
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1511-1520
pubmed: 33712289
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Apr;38(4):907-916
pubmed: 33575856
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Nov 28;1(2):e10463
pubmed: 31518288
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S9
pubmed: 24625283
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):440-9
pubmed: 27006004
JAMA. 2019 Sep 3;322(9):811-812
pubmed: 31343669
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):521-4
pubmed: 21300518
Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Mar;33(3):267-79
pubmed: 9731164
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431
pubmed: 28402085
Psychooncology. 2019 Jul;28(7):1520-1529
pubmed: 31099124
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1891-7
pubmed: 23481277
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1994-9
pubmed: 23465707
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Apr 14;:
pubmed: 37058261
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):281-3
pubmed: 23194822

Auteurs

Sherine Sandhu (S)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia. sherine.sandhu@unimelb.edu.au.

Martha Hickey (M)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.

Raelia Lew (R)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Reproductive Services Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Karin Hammarberg (K)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, Australia.

Sabine Braat (S)

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
MISCH (Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health) Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Franca Agresta (F)

Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, Australia.

Anna Parle (A)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.

Catherine Allingham (C)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.

Michelle Peate (M)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, Cnr Grattan Street & Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH