Impact of general practice / family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:a descriptive study.
community medicine
family doctor
general practitioner
medical education
postgraduate training
Journal
Fukushima journal of medical science
ISSN: 2185-4610
Titre abrégé: Fukushima J Med Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0374626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2023
10 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
11
8
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite international recognition of the impact of general practice / family medicine training on postgraduate training outcomes, there have been few reports from Japan. Junior residents who participated in community medicine training for one month between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The settings were five medical institutions (one hospital and four clinics) that had full-time family doctors. The junior residents were assigned to one of these institutions. The training content mainly consisted of general ambulatory care, home medical care, community-based care, and reflection. The junior residents evaluated themselves at the beginning and end of their training, and the family doctors evaluated the junior residents at the end. The evaluation items were 36 items in 10 areas, based on the objectives outlined in the Guidelines for Residency Training - 2020 Edition, and were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. In the statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank test of two related groups was performed to analyze changes between pre and post self-evaluation, and the effect size r was calculated. Ninety-one junior residents completed the study. Their self-evaluations showed statistically significant increases in all 36 items. The effect size was large in 33 items. The family doctors' evaluation was 8-9 points for all 36 items. General practice / family medicine training may greatly contribute to the acquisition of various required clinical abilities in postgraduate training even in Japan.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite international recognition of the impact of general practice / family medicine training on postgraduate training outcomes, there have been few reports from Japan.
METHODS
METHODS
Junior residents who participated in community medicine training for one month between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The settings were five medical institutions (one hospital and four clinics) that had full-time family doctors. The junior residents were assigned to one of these institutions. The training content mainly consisted of general ambulatory care, home medical care, community-based care, and reflection. The junior residents evaluated themselves at the beginning and end of their training, and the family doctors evaluated the junior residents at the end. The evaluation items were 36 items in 10 areas, based on the objectives outlined in the Guidelines for Residency Training - 2020 Edition, and were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. In the statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank test of two related groups was performed to analyze changes between pre and post self-evaluation, and the effect size r was calculated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ninety-one junior residents completed the study. Their self-evaluations showed statistically significant increases in all 36 items. The effect size was large in 33 items. The family doctors' evaluation was 8-9 points for all 36 items.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
General practice / family medicine training may greatly contribute to the acquisition of various required clinical abilities in postgraduate training even in Japan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37164763
doi: 10.5387/fms.2022-35
pmc: PMC10480516
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
133-141Références
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Apr;18(2):167-9
pubmed: 22477745
Med Teach. 2010;32(10):e448-52
pubmed: 20854152
Med Teach. 2008;30(3):254-9
pubmed: 18484451
Clin Teach. 2015 Feb;12(1):8-13
pubmed: 25603700
Med J Aust. 2007 Apr 2;186(7):346-9
pubmed: 17407430
Educ Prim Care. 2009 Nov;20(6):455-61
pubmed: 20132641
BMJ. 2003 May 10;326(7397):1019-22
pubmed: 12742926