Prevalence and molecular characterization of Entamoeba moshkovskii in diarrheal patients from Eastern India.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
12
10
2022
accepted:
05
04
2023
revised:
26
05
2023
medline:
29
5
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
11
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Importance of the amphizoic amoeba Entamoeba moshkovskii is increasing in the study of amoebiasis as a common human pathogen in some settings. Limited studies are found on the genetic and phylogenetic characterization of E. moshkovskii from India; hence remain largely unknown. In this study, we determined the prevalence and characterized the E. moshkovskii isolates in eastern India. A three-year systemic surveillance study among a total of 6051 diarrhoeal patients from ID Hospital and BC Roy Hospital, Kolkata was conducted for E. moshkovskii detection via a nested PCR system targeting 18S rRNA locus. The outer primer set detected the genus Entamoeba and the inner primer pair identified the E. moshkovskii species. The 18S rRNA locus of the positive samples was sequenced. Genetic and phylogenetic structures were determined using DnaSP.v5 and MEGA-X. GraphPad Prism (v.8.4.2), CA, USA was used to analyze the statistical data. 4.84% (95%CI = 0.0433-0.0541) samples were positive for Entamoeba spp and 3.12% (95%CI = 0.027-0.036) were infected with E. moshkovskii. E. moshkovskii infection was significantly associated with age groups (X2 = 26.01, P<0.0001) but not with gender (Fisher's exact test = 0.2548, P<0.05). A unique seasonal pattern was found for E. moshkovskii infection. Additionally, 46.56% (95%CI = 0.396-0.537) were sole E. moshkovskii infections and significantly associated with diarrheal incidence (X2 = 335.5,df = 9; P<0.0001). Sequencing revealed that the local E. moshkovskii strains were 99.59%-100% identical to the prototype (GenBank: KP722605.1). The study found certain SNPs that showed a correlation with clinical features, but it is not necessarily indicative of direct control over pathogenicity. However, SNPs in the 18S rRNA gene could impact the biology of the amoeba and serve as a useful phylogenetic marker for identifying pathogenic E. moshkovskii isolates. Neutrality tests of different coinfected subgroups indicated deviations from neutrality and implied population expansion after a bottleneck event or a selective sweep and/or purifying selection in co-infected subgroups. The majority of FST values of different coinfected subgroups were <0.25, indicating low to moderate genetic differentiation within the subgroups of this geographical area. The findings reveal the epidemiological significance of E. moshkovskii infection in Eastern India as the first report in this geographical area and expose this species as a possible emerging enteric pathogen in India. Our findings provide useful knowledge for further research and the development of future control strategies against E. moshkovskii.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Importance of the amphizoic amoeba Entamoeba moshkovskii is increasing in the study of amoebiasis as a common human pathogen in some settings. Limited studies are found on the genetic and phylogenetic characterization of E. moshkovskii from India; hence remain largely unknown. In this study, we determined the prevalence and characterized the E. moshkovskii isolates in eastern India.
METHODS
A three-year systemic surveillance study among a total of 6051 diarrhoeal patients from ID Hospital and BC Roy Hospital, Kolkata was conducted for E. moshkovskii detection via a nested PCR system targeting 18S rRNA locus. The outer primer set detected the genus Entamoeba and the inner primer pair identified the E. moshkovskii species. The 18S rRNA locus of the positive samples was sequenced. Genetic and phylogenetic structures were determined using DnaSP.v5 and MEGA-X. GraphPad Prism (v.8.4.2), CA, USA was used to analyze the statistical data.
RESULT
4.84% (95%CI = 0.0433-0.0541) samples were positive for Entamoeba spp and 3.12% (95%CI = 0.027-0.036) were infected with E. moshkovskii. E. moshkovskii infection was significantly associated with age groups (X2 = 26.01, P<0.0001) but not with gender (Fisher's exact test = 0.2548, P<0.05). A unique seasonal pattern was found for E. moshkovskii infection. Additionally, 46.56% (95%CI = 0.396-0.537) were sole E. moshkovskii infections and significantly associated with diarrheal incidence (X2 = 335.5,df = 9; P<0.0001). Sequencing revealed that the local E. moshkovskii strains were 99.59%-100% identical to the prototype (GenBank: KP722605.1). The study found certain SNPs that showed a correlation with clinical features, but it is not necessarily indicative of direct control over pathogenicity. However, SNPs in the 18S rRNA gene could impact the biology of the amoeba and serve as a useful phylogenetic marker for identifying pathogenic E. moshkovskii isolates. Neutrality tests of different coinfected subgroups indicated deviations from neutrality and implied population expansion after a bottleneck event or a selective sweep and/or purifying selection in co-infected subgroups. The majority of FST values of different coinfected subgroups were <0.25, indicating low to moderate genetic differentiation within the subgroups of this geographical area.
CONCLUSION
The findings reveal the epidemiological significance of E. moshkovskii infection in Eastern India as the first report in this geographical area and expose this species as a possible emerging enteric pathogen in India. Our findings provide useful knowledge for further research and the development of future control strategies against E. moshkovskii.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37167334
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011287
pii: PNTD-D-22-01293
pmc: PMC10218735
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 18S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0011287Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Sardar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Acta Trop. 2008 Jul;107(1):48-9
pubmed: 18471796
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;13(2):318-31
pubmed: 10756002
Trop Biomed. 2011 Aug;28(2):194-222
pubmed: 22041740
Exp Parasitol. 1970 Oct;28(2):171-5
pubmed: 5504477
Protist. 2011 Jul;162(3):525-41
pubmed: 21295520
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;18(9):1543-5
pubmed: 22932710
Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020 Feb 20;18:e00076
pubmed: 32154398
BMC Microbiol. 2007 May 24;7:47
pubmed: 17524135
Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1983;58(5):413-22
pubmed: 6660794
Acta Parasitol. 2020 Dec;65(4):929-935
pubmed: 32557084
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3748-56
pubmed: 12904386
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549
pubmed: 29722887
Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):156-60
pubmed: 26732073
Malar J. 2021 May 26;20(1):236
pubmed: 34039364
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec 2;2018:4601420
pubmed: 30631758
Parasitol Int. 2021 Aug;83:102370
pubmed: 33932601
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1959 Sep;8:583-9
pubmed: 13806300
Acta Trop. 2012 Sep;123(3):139-45
pubmed: 22664420
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Oct;16(4):713-29
pubmed: 14557296
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 12;2014:645084
pubmed: 24693242
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Oct;83(10):1154-9; quiz 1159-60
pubmed: 18828976
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3196-200
pubmed: 16954247
Tex Rep Biol Med. 1961;19:393-6
pubmed: 13724389
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Mar;45(3):1035-7
pubmed: 17229864
Infect Genet Evol. 2017 Oct;54:216-220
pubmed: 28698157
Epidemiol Bull. 1997 Mar;18(1):13-4
pubmed: 9197085
Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2019 Dec 17;5:23
pubmed: 31890239
Gut Pathog. 2010 Oct 06;2(1):12
pubmed: 20925925
Pathog Glob Health. 2015 Jul;109(5):242-6
pubmed: 26103990
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Apr;22(4):493-504
pubmed: 28151567
Parasitology. 2012 Oct;139(12):1521-5
pubmed: 22939193
Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 1;11(23):2613-8
pubmed: 19630212
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 27;13:243
pubmed: 23705776
J Trop Med. 2020 Jul 14;2020:3134849
pubmed: 32733575
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1991 May;46(1):11-8
pubmed: 1677159
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Jul;20(3):511-32, table of contents
pubmed: 17630338
Clin Lab Med. 2015 Jun;35(2):393-422
pubmed: 26004649
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 03;9(12):e0004225
pubmed: 26633890
J Infect Dis. 2012 Sep 1;206(5):744-51
pubmed: 22723640
BMC Res Notes. 2009 Jun 19;2:110
pubmed: 19545355
Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1209-20
pubmed: 8307331
J Parasitol. 2008 Apr;94(2):530-2
pubmed: 18564756
Trop Doct. 2017 Jan;47(1):11-15
pubmed: 26834117
J Health Popul Nutr. 2005 Sep;23(3):292-5
pubmed: 16262027
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Nov;79(5):706-7
pubmed: 18981508
Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791
pubmed: 28561359
Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512-26
pubmed: 8336541
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Sep 04;5:187
pubmed: 22947430
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004 May;70(5):536-9
pubmed: 15155987
Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 May;9(5):580-4
pubmed: 12737742