Prenatal exposures to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and epigenetic aging in umbilical cord blood: The Healthy Start study.
Epigenetic aging
Mixtures analysis
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
Perfluoroalkyl carboxylates
Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates
Prenatal exposures
Journal
Environmental research
ISSN: 1096-0953
Titre abrégé: Environ Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0147621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 08 2023
15 08 2023
Historique:
received:
06
01
2023
revised:
19
05
2023
accepted:
20
05
2023
pmc-release:
15
08
2024
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
25
5
2023
entrez:
24
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are ubiquitous, environmentally persistent chemicals, and prenatal exposures have been associated with adverse child health outcomes. Prenatal PFAS exposure may lead to epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), defined as the discrepancy between an individual's chronologic and epigenetic or biological age. We estimated associations of maternal serum PFAS concentrations with EAA in umbilical cord blood DNA methylation using linear regression, and a multivariable exposure-response function of the PFAS mixture using Bayesian kernel machine regression. Five PFAS were quantified in maternal serum (median: 27 weeks of gestation) among 577 mother-infant dyads from a prospective cohort. Cord blood DNA methylation data were assessed with the Illumina HumanMethylation450 array. EAA was calculated as the residuals from regressing gestational age on epigenetic age, calculated using a cord-blood specific epigenetic clock. Linear regression tested for associations between each maternal PFAS concentration with EAA. Bayesian kernel machine regression with hierarchical selection estimated an exposure-response function for the PFAS mixture. In single pollutant models we observed an inverse relationship between perfluorodecanoate (PFDA) and EAA (-0.148 weeks per log-unit increase, 95% CI: -0.283, -0.013). Mixture analysis with hierarchical selection between perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and sulfonates indicated the carboxylates had the highest group posterior inclusion probability (PIP), or relative importance. Within this group, PFDA had the highest conditional PIP. Univariate predictor-response functions indicated PFDA and perfluorononanoate were inversely associated with EAA, while perfluorohexane sulfonate had a positive association with EAA. Maternal mid-pregnancy serum concentrations of PFDA were negatively associated with EAA in cord blood, suggesting a pathway by which prenatal PFAS exposures may affect infant development. No significant associations were observed with other PFAS. Mixture models suggested opposite directions of association between perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and carboxylates. Future studies are needed to determine the importance of neonatal EAA for later child health outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are ubiquitous, environmentally persistent chemicals, and prenatal exposures have been associated with adverse child health outcomes. Prenatal PFAS exposure may lead to epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), defined as the discrepancy between an individual's chronologic and epigenetic or biological age.
OBJECTIVES
We estimated associations of maternal serum PFAS concentrations with EAA in umbilical cord blood DNA methylation using linear regression, and a multivariable exposure-response function of the PFAS mixture using Bayesian kernel machine regression.
METHODS
Five PFAS were quantified in maternal serum (median: 27 weeks of gestation) among 577 mother-infant dyads from a prospective cohort. Cord blood DNA methylation data were assessed with the Illumina HumanMethylation450 array. EAA was calculated as the residuals from regressing gestational age on epigenetic age, calculated using a cord-blood specific epigenetic clock. Linear regression tested for associations between each maternal PFAS concentration with EAA. Bayesian kernel machine regression with hierarchical selection estimated an exposure-response function for the PFAS mixture.
RESULTS
In single pollutant models we observed an inverse relationship between perfluorodecanoate (PFDA) and EAA (-0.148 weeks per log-unit increase, 95% CI: -0.283, -0.013). Mixture analysis with hierarchical selection between perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and sulfonates indicated the carboxylates had the highest group posterior inclusion probability (PIP), or relative importance. Within this group, PFDA had the highest conditional PIP. Univariate predictor-response functions indicated PFDA and perfluorononanoate were inversely associated with EAA, while perfluorohexane sulfonate had a positive association with EAA.
CONCLUSIONS
Maternal mid-pregnancy serum concentrations of PFDA were negatively associated with EAA in cord blood, suggesting a pathway by which prenatal PFAS exposures may affect infant development. No significant associations were observed with other PFAS. Mixture models suggested opposite directions of association between perfluoroalkyl sulfonates and carboxylates. Future studies are needed to determine the importance of neonatal EAA for later child health outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37224946
pii: S0013-9351(23)01016-2
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116215
pmc: PMC10330919
mid: NIHMS1905533
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Environmental Pollutants
0
Fluorocarbons
0
Alkanesulfonates
0
Carboxylic Acids
0
Alkanesulfonic Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116215Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK076648
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES022934
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UG3 OD023248
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UH3 OD023248
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Mar;130(3):37005
pubmed: 35266797
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jun;94(6):2131-2147
pubmed: 32227269
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Apr;41(7):e90
pubmed: 23476028
Epigenetics. 2016 May 3;11(5):354-62
pubmed: 27019159
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 May;57(5):321-328.e2
pubmed: 29706161
Clin Epigenetics. 2021 Apr 29;13(1):97
pubmed: 33926514
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Jul 26;10(7):1758-1775
pubmed: 30048243
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Jan 15;250(2):108-16
pubmed: 21075133
Epigenetics. 2022 Dec;17(13):2006-2021
pubmed: 35912433
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:174-178
pubmed: 28645023
Epigenomics. 2021 Oct;13(20):1619-1636
pubmed: 34670402
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 15;29(2):189-96
pubmed: 23175756
Environ Epigenet. 2022 Feb 04;8(1):dvac004
pubmed: 35308102
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2016 Dec 7;9:56
pubmed: 27980682
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 08;13:86
pubmed: 22568884
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jun;19(6):371-384
pubmed: 29643443
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018 Mar;5(1):1-19
pubmed: 29556975
Epigenetics. 2018;13(9):941-958
pubmed: 30232931
Toxicology. 2022 Jan 15;465:153024
pubmed: 34743024
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 15;30(10):1363-9
pubmed: 24478339
J Biol Chem. 2000 Feb 18;275(7):4541-4
pubmed: 10671476
Environ Int. 2018 Jun;115:21-28
pubmed: 29544137
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2012 Feb;215(2):216-9
pubmed: 21937271
Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:104983
pubmed: 31284113
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 27;14(7):
pubmed: 28654008
Environ Health Perspect. 2020 Dec;128(12):127014
pubmed: 33356526
EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:29-36
pubmed: 28396265
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 Aug 27;11(1):125
pubmed: 31455416
J Immunotoxicol. 2016;13(1):38-45
pubmed: 25594567
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 28;16:180
pubmed: 26316348
Blood. 2008 Nov 15;112(10):4250-8
pubmed: 18535203
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244815
pubmed: 33382826
Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:409-35
pubmed: 11818483
Genome Biol. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):207
pubmed: 27717397
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21 Suppl 4:S17-24
pubmed: 21422965
Science. 2022 Feb 4;375(6580):eabg9065
pubmed: 35113710
Epigenomics. 2016 Nov;8(11):1481-1494
pubmed: 27687885
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3407-3416
pubmed: 32013415
Genome Biol. 2015 Jan 30;16:25
pubmed: 25633388
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1478-1488
pubmed: 27745942
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:471-8
pubmed: 26257032
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jun 26;125(6):067016
pubmed: 28669937
J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:168-173.e2
pubmed: 29705119
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 1;45(19):8037-45
pubmed: 21469664
Genome Biol. 2014 Dec 03;15(12):503
pubmed: 25599564
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Apr 30;76(5):741-749
pubmed: 33211845
Toxicology. 2020 Oct;443:152565
pubmed: 32861749
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 May 8;9:49
pubmed: 28503212
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1028-39
pubmed: 24968388
Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 15;33(4):558-560
pubmed: 28035024
Environ Health. 2018 Aug 20;17(1):67
pubmed: 30126431
Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115
pubmed: 24138928
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 May 9;11(1):73
pubmed: 31072398
Genome Biol. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):206
pubmed: 27717399
Epigenetics. 2013 Feb;8(2):203-9
pubmed: 23314698
Genome Biol. 2012 Jun 15;13(6):R44
pubmed: 22703947
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 1;780:146399
pubmed: 33770593