Impact of Minimally Invasive Intrathoracic Hand-sewn Esophago-gastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Esophageal cancer
anastomotic leak
hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis
outcomes
totally minimally invasive esophagectomy
Journal
Anticancer research
ISSN: 1791-7530
Titre abrégé: Anticancer Res
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 8102988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
26
03
2023
revised:
05
04
2023
accepted:
07
04
2023
medline:
31
5
2023
pubmed:
30
5
2023
entrez:
29
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is considered the gold standard approach for the treatment of distal esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided improved outcomes compared to the open approach, offering reduced morbidity, and improved clinical and oncological outcomes. This is the largest study so far reporting the impact of hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position, during the 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data regarding consecutive patients with distal-esophageal and gastroesophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors was conducted. All patients underwent 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy with thoracoscopic manual esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position. Clinical and oncological outcomes were examined and presented. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients were included in the study during a period of five years. Median operative time was 320 minutes, while median time for the construction of anastomosis was 45 minutes. We had no conversions to open esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 2% of the patients; anastomotic stricture rate reached up to 7.33%. Respiratory complications were seen in 18% and cardiac complications in 6.66% of the patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality and 90-day mortality rates were 1.33% and 2.66%, accordingly. Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position during totally minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided favorable outcomes in our cohort of patients, offering significantly reduced anastomotic-related complications, compared to other standardized techniques. Further prospective comparative studies are needed, to better interpret and amplify our results, that may lead to a paradigm shift regarding the preferred method of reconstruction from esophageal surgeons.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIM
OBJECTIVE
Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is considered the gold standard approach for the treatment of distal esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided improved outcomes compared to the open approach, offering reduced morbidity, and improved clinical and oncological outcomes. This is the largest study so far reporting the impact of hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position, during the 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data regarding consecutive patients with distal-esophageal and gastroesophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors was conducted. All patients underwent 2-stage totally minimally invasive esophagectomy with thoracoscopic manual esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position. Clinical and oncological outcomes were examined and presented.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and fifty consecutive patients were included in the study during a period of five years. Median operative time was 320 minutes, while median time for the construction of anastomosis was 45 minutes. We had no conversions to open esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 2% of the patients; anastomotic stricture rate reached up to 7.33%. Respiratory complications were seen in 18% and cardiac complications in 6.66% of the patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality and 90-day mortality rates were 1.33% and 2.66%, accordingly.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Intrathoracic hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in the prone position during totally minimally invasive esophagectomy has provided favorable outcomes in our cohort of patients, offering significantly reduced anastomotic-related complications, compared to other standardized techniques. Further prospective comparative studies are needed, to better interpret and amplify our results, that may lead to a paradigm shift regarding the preferred method of reconstruction from esophageal surgeons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37247891
pii: 43/6/2749
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16442
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2749-2755Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.