Efficacy of Propranolol to Reduce Cesarean Delivery in Prolonged Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2023
01 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
10
03
2023
accepted:
06
04
2023
pmc-release:
01
07
2024
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
8
6
2023
entrez:
8
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the rates of cesarean delivery in patients with prolonged labor randomized to receive intravenous (IV) propranolol compared with placebo. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted at two hospitals within a large academic health system. Eligible patients were at 36 weeks or more with a singleton gestation and prolonged labor , defined as: 1) prolonged latent phase of labor (dilation less than 6 cm after 8 hours or more with ruptured membranes and receiving oxytocin infusion) or 2) prolonged active phase of labor (dilation 6 cm or greater and less than 1-cm cervical dilation change over 2 hours or more with ruptured membranes and receiving oxytocin infusion). Patients were excluded for severe preeclampsia, maternal heart rate less than 70 beats per minute, maternal blood pressure less than 90/50 mm Hg, asthma, diabetes requiring insulin during labor, or a cardiac contraindication to β-blockade. Patients were randomized to propranolol (2 mg IV) compared with placebo (2 mL normal saline IV), with one possible repeat dose. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery; secondary outcomes included labor duration, shoulder dystocia, and maternal and neonatal morbidity. With an estimated cesarean delivery rate of 45%, α 0.05, and 80% power, we required 163 patients per group to detect a 15% absolute reduction in cesarean delivery rate. A planned interim analysis was performed, and the trial was stopped for futility. From July 2020 to June 2022, 349 patients were eligible and approached; 164 were enrolled and randomized, with 84 in the propranolol group and 80 in the placebo group. The rate of cesarean delivery was not different between groups (57.1% propranolol vs 57.5% placebo, relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.76-1.29). Results were similar by subgroup of prolonged latent (n=123) and active (n=41) phases of labor and nulliparous (n=137) and multiparous (n=27) patients. Though not statistically significant, the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage was higher in the propranolol group (20% vs 10%, RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.93-4.43). In this multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, there was no difference in cesarean delivery rate for patients who received propranolol compared with those who received placebo for management of prolonged labor. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04299438.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37290102
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005232
pii: 00006250-202307000-00009
pmc: PMC10330332
mid: NIHMS1894148
doi:
Substances chimiques
Propranolol
9Y8NXQ24VQ
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04299438']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71-79Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD001265
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : T32 HD007440
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial Disclosure Lisa L. Devine discloses that this article discussed off-label use of propranolol. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693–711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1127–35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f5eaf0
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f5eaf0
Maghoma J, Buchmann EJ. Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:16–9. doi: 10.1080/01443610120101637
doi: 10.1080/01443610120101637
Eskes T, Stolte L, Seelen J, Moed HD, Vogelsang C. Epinephrine derivates and the activity of the human uterus. II. The influence of pronethalol and propanolol on the uterine and systemic activity of P-hydroxyphenylisopropylarterenol (CC-25). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;92:871–81. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34796-2
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34796-2
Mahon WA, Reid DW, Day RA. The in vivo effects of beta adrenergic stimulation and blockade on the human uterus at term. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1967;156:178–85.
Rouget C, Bardou M, Breuiller-Fouché M, Loustalot C, Qi H, Naline E, et al. β3-adrenoceptor is the predominant β-adrenoceptor subtype in human myometrium and its expression is up-regulated in pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:1644–50. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0233
doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0233
Dennedy MC, Houlihan DD, McMillan H, Morrison JJ. β2- and β3-adrenoreceptor agonists: human myometrial selectivity and effects on umbilical artery tone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:641–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125277
doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125277
Bigelow CA, Pan S, Overbey JR, Stone J. Propranolol for induction of labor in nulliparas trial a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100301
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100301
Cilliers F, Schoon M, Bam R, Niemand I. A randomised clinical trial to determine the effect of beta-adrenergic blocking with propranolol on labour. South Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;19:53–5. doi: 10.7196/sajog.643
doi: 10.7196/sajog.643
Kashanian M, Fekrat M, Zarrin Z, Ansari NS. A comparison between the effect of oxytocin only and oxytocin plus propranolol on the labor (a double blind randomized trial). J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:354–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00790.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00790.x
Palomäki O, Uotila J, Tammela O, Kaila T, Lavapuro M, Huhtala H, et al. A double blind, randomized trial on augmentation of labour with a combination of intravenous propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin only. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;125:44–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.016
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.016
Sanchez-Ramos L, Quillen MJ, Kaunitz AM. Randomized trial of oxytocin alone and with propranolol in the management of dysfunctional labor. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:517–20. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00223-2
doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00223-2
Adamsons K, de la Vega A, Santiago P. Reduction in the cesarean section rate in nulliparous patients after administration of intravenous propranolol. P R Health Sci J 1999;18:5–8.
Direkvand-Moghadam A, Jaafarpour M, Khani A, Taheri S, Delpisheh A. The effect of oral propranolol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin only on the process and outcome of labor: a double-blind randomized trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014;19:491–5.
Pergialiotis V, Frountzas M, Prodromidou A, Prapa S, Perrea DN, Vlachos GD. Propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for induction and augmentation of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:721–9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3991-8
doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3991-8
National Library of Medicine. DailyMed database: propranolol hydrochloride injection. Accessed October 16, 2019. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=91f2ff1d-68d8-4e83-a2db-618f0410ead7
Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. A standardized labor induction protocol: impact on racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020;2:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100148
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100148
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010