RNA polymerase II depletion from the inactive X chromosome territory is not mediated by physical compartmentalization.


Journal

Nature structural & molecular biology
ISSN: 1545-9985
Titre abrégé: Nat Struct Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101186374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 15 04 2021
accepted: 28 04 2023
medline: 23 8 2023
pubmed: 9 6 2023
entrez: 8 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Subnuclear compartmentalization has been proposed to play an important role in gene regulation by segregating active and inactive parts of the genome in distinct physical and biochemical environments. During X chromosome inactivation (XCI), the noncoding Xist RNA coats the X chromosome, triggers gene silencing and forms a dense body of heterochromatin from which the transcription machinery appears to be excluded. Phase separation has been proposed to be involved in XCI, and might explain the exclusion of the transcription machinery by preventing its diffusion into the Xist-coated territory. Here, using quantitative fluorescence microscopy and single-particle tracking, we show that RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) freely accesses the Xist territory during the initiation of XCI. Instead, the apparent depletion of RNAPII is due to the loss of its chromatin stably bound fraction. These findings indicate that initial exclusion of RNAPII from the inactive X reflects the absence of actively transcribing RNAPII, rather than a consequence of putative physical compartmentalization of the inactive X heterochromatin domain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37291424
doi: 10.1038/s41594-023-01008-5
pii: 10.1038/s41594-023-01008-5
pmc: PMC10442225
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA Polymerase II EC 2.7.7.-
Heterochromatin 0
Chromatin 0
RNA, Untranslated 0
RNA, Long Noncoding 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1216-1223

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA231641
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Okamoto, I., Otte, A. P., Allis, C. D., Reinberg, D. & Heard, E. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303, 644–649 (2004).
pubmed: 14671313 doi: 10.1126/science.1092727
Chaumeil, J., Le Baccon, P., Wutz, A. & Heard, E. A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes Dev. 20, 2223–2237 (2006).
pubmed: 16912274 pmcid: 1553206 doi: 10.1101/gad.380906
Fraser, P. & Bickmore, W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 447, 413–417 (2007).
pubmed: 17522674 doi: 10.1038/nature05916
Chow, J. C. et al. LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Cell 141, 956–969 (2010).
pubmed: 20550932 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.042
McHugh, C. A. et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature 521, 232–236 (2015).
pubmed: 25915022 pmcid: 4516396 doi: 10.1038/nature14443
Dossin, F. et al. SPEN integrates transcriptional and epigenetic control of X-inactivation. Nature 578, 455–460 (2020).
pubmed: 32025035 pmcid: 7035112 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1974-9
Plath, K. et al. Developmentally regulated alterations in Polycomb repressive complex 1 proteins on the inactive X chromosome. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1025–1035 (2004).
pubmed: 15596546 pmcid: 2172612 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409026
Silva, J. et al. Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev. Cell 4, 481–495 (2003).
pubmed: 12689588 doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00068-6
de Napoles, M. et al. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev. Cell 7, 663–676 (2004).
pubmed: 15525528 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.005
Pintacuda, G. et al. hnRNPK recruits PCGF3/5-PRC1 to the Xist RNA B-repeat to establish polycomb-mediated chromosomal silencing. Mol. Cell 68, 955–969.e10 (2017).
pubmed: 29220657 pmcid: 5735038 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.013
Sunwoo, H., Colognori, D., Froberg, J. E., Jeon, Y. & Lee, J. T. Repeat E anchors Xist RNA to the inactive X chromosomal compartment through CDKN1A-interacting protein (CIZ1). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10654–10659 (2017).
pubmed: 28923964 pmcid: 5635913 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711206114
Pandya-Jones, A. et al. A protein assembly mediates Xist localization and gene silencing. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2703-0 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2703-0 pubmed: 33005055 pmcid: 7644664
Jachowicz, J. W. et al. Xist spatially amplifies SHARP recruitment to balance chromosome-wide silencing and specificity to the X chromosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 239–249 (2022).
pubmed: 35301492 pmcid: 8969943 doi: 10.1038/s41594-022-00739-1
Markaki, Y. et al. Xist nucleates local protein gradients to propagate silencing across the X chromosome. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.022 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.022 pubmed: 34890555 pmcid: 8722464
Cerase, A. et al. Phase separation drives X-chromosome inactivation: a hypothesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 331–334 (2019).
pubmed: 31061525 doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0223-0
McSwiggen, D. T., Mir, M., Darzacq, X. & Tjian, R. Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences. Genes Dev. 33, 1619–1634 (2019).
pubmed: 31594803 pmcid: 6942051 doi: 10.1101/gad.331520.119
Li, J. et al. Single-gene imaging links genome topology, promoter-enhancer communication and transcription control. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1032–1040 (2020).
pubmed: 32958948 pmcid: 7644657 doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0493-6
Erdel, F. et al. Mouse heterochromatin adopts digital compaction states without showing hallmarks of HP1-driven liquid-liquid phase separation. Mol. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.005 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.005 pubmed: 32101700 pmcid: 7163299
Trojanowski, J., Frank, L., Rademacher, A. & Grigaitis, P. Transcription activation is enhanced by multivalent interactions independent of phase separation. Mol. Cell 19, 1878–1893 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.017
Chong, S., Graham, T. G. W., Dugast-Darzacq, C. & Dailey, G. M. Tuning levels of low-complexity domain interactions to modulate endogenous oncogenic transcription. Mol. Cell 11, 2084–2097 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.007
Schulz, E. G. et al. The two active X chromosomes in female ESCs block exit from the pluripotent state by modulating the ESC signaling network. Cell Stem Cell 14, 203–216 (2014).
pubmed: 24506884 doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.022
Masui, O., Heard, E. & Koseki, H. Live Imaging of Xist RNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 1861, 67–72 (2018).
pubmed: 30218360 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8766-5_6
Sousa, L. B. D. A. E., Jonkers, I., Syx, L. & Dunkel, I. Kinetics of Xist-induced gene silencing can be predicted from combinations of epigenetic and genomic features. Genome 29, 1087–1099 (2019).
doi: 10.1101/gr.245027.118
Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
pubmed: 31570887 doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9
Politi, A. Z. et al. Quantitative mapping of fluorescently tagged cellular proteins using FCS-calibrated four-dimensional imaging. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1445–1464 (2018).
pubmed: 29844523 pmcid: 6609853 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.040
Hansen, A. S. et al. Robust model-based analysis of single-particle tracking experiments with Spot-On. eLife 7, e33125 (2018).
pubmed: 29300163 pmcid: 5809147 doi: 10.7554/eLife.33125
Izeddin, I. et al. Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus. eLife 3, e02230 (2014).
pubmed: 24925319 pmcid: 4095940 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02230
McSwiggen, D. T. et al. Evidence for DNA-mediated nuclear compartmentalization distinct from phase separation. eLife 8, e47098 (2019).
pubmed: 31038454 pmcid: 6522219 doi: 10.7554/eLife.47098
Backlund, M. P., Joyner, R. & Moerner, W. E. Chromosomal locus tracking with proper accounting of static and dynamic errors. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 91, 062716 (2015).
pubmed: 26172745 pmcid: 4533921 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.062716
Heckert, A. B., Dahal, L., Tjian, R. & Darzacq, X. Recovering mixtures of fast diffusing states from short single particle trajectories. eLife 11, e70169 (2022).
pubmed: 36066004 pmcid: 9451534 doi: 10.7554/eLife.70169
Giorgetti, L. et al. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell 157, 950–963 (2014).
pubmed: 24813616 pmcid: 4427251 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.025
Collombet, S. et al. Parental-to-embryo switch of chromosome organization in early embryogenesis. Nature 580, 142–146 (2020).
pubmed: 32238933 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2125-z
Darzacq, X. et al. In vivo dynamics of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 796–806 (2007).
pubmed: 17676063 pmcid: 4942130 doi: 10.1038/nsmb1280
Bensaude, O. Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: Which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity? Transcription 2, 103–108 (2011).
pubmed: 21922053 pmcid: 3173647 doi: 10.4161/trns.2.3.16172
Smeets, D. et al. Three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy of the inactive X chromosome territory reveals a collapse of its active nuclear compartment harboring distinct Xist RNA foci. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 8 (2014).
pubmed: 25057298 pmcid: 4108088 doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-8
Rego, A., Sinclair, P. B., Tao, W., Kireev, I. & Belmont, A. S. The facultative heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome has a distinctive condensed ultrastructure. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1119–1127 (2008).
pubmed: 18334550 doi: 10.1242/jcs.026104
O’Flynn, B. G. & Mittag, T. The role of liquid–liquid phase separation in regulating enzyme activity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 69, 70–79 (2021).
pubmed: 33503539 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.12.012
Wutz, A., Rasmussen, T. P. & Jaenisch, R. Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat. Genet. 30, 167–174 (2002).
pubmed: 11780141 doi: 10.1038/ng820
Engreitz, J. M. et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science 341, 1237973 (2013).
pubmed: 23828888 pmcid: 3778663 doi: 10.1126/science.1237973
Żylicz, J. J. et al. The implication of early chromatin changes in X chromosome inactivation. Cell 176, 182–197.e23 (2019).
pubmed: 30595450 pmcid: 6333919 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.041
Appel, L.-M. et al. PHF3 regulates neuronal gene expression through the Pol II CTD reader domain SPOC. Nat. Commun. 12, 6078 (2021).
pubmed: 34667177 pmcid: 8526623 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26360-2
Teller, K. et al. A top-down analysis of Xa- and Xi-territories reveals differences of higher order structure at ≥ 20 Mb genomic length scales. Nucleus 2, 465–477 (2011).
pubmed: 21970989 doi: 10.4161/nucl.2.5.17862
Gdula, M. R. et al. The non-canonical SMC protein SmcHD1 antagonises TAD formation and compartmentalisation on the inactive X chromosome. Nat. Commun. 10, 30 (2019).
pubmed: 30604745 pmcid: 6318279 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07907-2
Wang, C. Y., Jégu, T., Chu, H. P., Oh, H. J. & Lee, J. T. SMCHD1 merges chromosome compartments and assists formation of super-structures on the inactive X. Cell 174, 406–421 (2018).
pubmed: 29887375 pmcid: 6475921 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.007
Buehler, R. J. Confidence intervals for the product of two binomial parameters. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 52, 482–493 (1957).
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1957.10501404
Rougeulle, C., Colleaux, L., Dujon, B. & Avner, P. Generation and characterization of an ordered lambda clone array for the 460 kb region surrounding the murine Xist sequence. Mamm. Genome 5, 416–423 (1994).
pubmed: 7726900 doi: 10.1007/BF00357001

Auteurs

Samuel Collombet (S)

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Isabell Rall (I)

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Claire Dugast-Darzacq (C)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Alec Heckert (A)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Aliaksandr Halavatyi (A)

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Agnes Le Saux (A)

Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, UPMC Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, France.

Gina Dailey (G)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Xavier Darzacq (X)

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. darzacq@berkeley.edu.
Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. darzacq@berkeley.edu.

Edith Heard (E)

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. edith.heard@embl.org.
Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR3215, INSERM U934, UPMC Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, France. edith.heard@embl.org.
College de France, Paris, France. edith.heard@embl.org.

Articles similaires

Humans Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive RNA, Long Noncoding Male Female
Humans Small Cell Lung Carcinoma RNA, Long Noncoding Sulfonamides Animals
Humans Female Ovarian Neoplasms Cell Proliferation RNA, Long Noncoding
Humans Temozolomide RNA, Long Noncoding Glioblastoma Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

Classifications MeSH