Creativity, pursuit and epistemic tradition.
Journal
Studies in history and philosophy of science
ISSN: 0039-3681
Titre abrégé: Stud Hist Philos Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1250602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
revised:
18
02
2023
accepted:
25
05
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
26
6
2023
entrez:
25
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper revisits the standard definition of scientific creativity in the contemporary philosophical literature. The standard definition of creativity says that there are two necessary, and jointly sufficient, conditions for creativity, novelty and value. This paper proposes to characterize the value condition of creativity in terms of "pursuitworthiness". The notion of pursuitworthiness, adopted from the recent debate on scientific pursuit in philosophy of science, refers to a form of prospective epistemic worth. It indicates that a certain object (such as a scientific hypothesis) is promising or has the potential to be epistemically fertile in the future, if further investigated. To support the claim that creative scientific instances are, qua creative, valuable in the sense of pursuitworthy, three examples of creative hypotheses taken from the history of the geosciences are introduced: MacCulloch's continuity hypothesis in mid-19th-century geology, Baron et al.'s phylogenetic hypothesis in contemporary paleontology, and the widely discussed Anthropocene hypothesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37356271
pii: S0039-3681(23)00083-3
doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
81-89Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.