Recombinant von Willebrand factor and tranexamic acid for heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild and moderate von Willebrand disease in the USA (VWDMin): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Haematology
ISSN: 2352-3026
Titre abrégé: Lancet Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101643584
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
29
01
2023
revised:
25
04
2023
accepted:
27
04
2023
pmc-release:
01
08
2024
medline:
4
8
2023
pubmed:
30
6
2023
entrez:
29
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Heavy menstrual bleeding occurs in 80% of women with von Willebrand disease and is associated with iron deficiency and poor response to current therapies. International guidelines indicate low certainty regarding effectiveness of hormonal therapy and tranexamic acid. Although von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate is approved for bleeds, no prospective trials guide its use in heavy menstrual bleeding. We aimed to compare recombinant VWF with tranexamic acid for reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease. VWDMin, a phase 3, open-label, randomised crossover trial, was done in 13 haemophilia treatment centres in the USA. Female patients aged 13-45 years with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease, defined as VWF ristocetin cofactor less than 0·50 IU/mL, and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score more than 100 in one of the past two cycles were eligible for enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to two consecutive cycles each of intravenous recombinant VWF, 40 IU/kg over 5-10 min on day 1, and oral tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily on days 1-5, the order determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was a 40-point reduction in PBAC score by day 5 after two cycles of treatment. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients with any post-baseline PBAC scores. The trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment on Feb 15, 2022, by a data safety monitoring board request, and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02606045. Between Feb 12, 2019, and Nov 16, 2021, 39 patients were enrolled, 36 of whom completed the trial (17 received recombinant VWF then tranexamic acid and 19 received tranexamic acid then recombinant VWF). At the time of this unplanned interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 27, 2022), median follow-up was 23·97 weeks (IQR 21·81-28·14). The primary endpoint was not met, neither treatment corrected PBAC score to the normal range. Median PBAC score was significantly lower after two cycles with tranexamic acid than with recombinant VWF (146 [95% CI 117-199] vs 213 [152-298]; adjusted mean treatment difference 46 [95% CI 2-90]; p=0·039). There were no serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths and no grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were mucosal bleeding (four [6%] patients during tranexamic acid treatment vs zero during recombinant VWF treatment) and other bleeding (four [6%] vs two [3%]). These interim data suggest that recombinant VWF is not superior to tranexamic acid in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease. These findings support discussion of treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding with patients based on their preferences and lived experience. National Heart Lung Blood Institute (National Institutes of Health).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Heavy menstrual bleeding occurs in 80% of women with von Willebrand disease and is associated with iron deficiency and poor response to current therapies. International guidelines indicate low certainty regarding effectiveness of hormonal therapy and tranexamic acid. Although von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate is approved for bleeds, no prospective trials guide its use in heavy menstrual bleeding. We aimed to compare recombinant VWF with tranexamic acid for reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease.
METHODS
METHODS
VWDMin, a phase 3, open-label, randomised crossover trial, was done in 13 haemophilia treatment centres in the USA. Female patients aged 13-45 years with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease, defined as VWF ristocetin cofactor less than 0·50 IU/mL, and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score more than 100 in one of the past two cycles were eligible for enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to two consecutive cycles each of intravenous recombinant VWF, 40 IU/kg over 5-10 min on day 1, and oral tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily on days 1-5, the order determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was a 40-point reduction in PBAC score by day 5 after two cycles of treatment. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients with any post-baseline PBAC scores. The trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment on Feb 15, 2022, by a data safety monitoring board request, and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02606045.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Between Feb 12, 2019, and Nov 16, 2021, 39 patients were enrolled, 36 of whom completed the trial (17 received recombinant VWF then tranexamic acid and 19 received tranexamic acid then recombinant VWF). At the time of this unplanned interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 27, 2022), median follow-up was 23·97 weeks (IQR 21·81-28·14). The primary endpoint was not met, neither treatment corrected PBAC score to the normal range. Median PBAC score was significantly lower after two cycles with tranexamic acid than with recombinant VWF (146 [95% CI 117-199] vs 213 [152-298]; adjusted mean treatment difference 46 [95% CI 2-90]; p=0·039). There were no serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths and no grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were mucosal bleeding (four [6%] patients during tranexamic acid treatment vs zero during recombinant VWF treatment) and other bleeding (four [6%] vs two [3%]).
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
These interim data suggest that recombinant VWF is not superior to tranexamic acid in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease. These findings support discussion of treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding with patients based on their preferences and lived experience.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
National Heart Lung Blood Institute (National Institutes of Health).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37385272
pii: S2352-3026(23)00119-9
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00119-9
pmc: PMC10528809
mid: NIHMS1914779
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tranexamic Acid
6T84R30KC1
von Willebrand Factor
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02606045']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e612-e623Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL133815
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests MVR reports research funding to her institution from BioMarin, Sanofi, SPARK, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and service on advisory boards of BeBio, BioMarin, Hemab Therapeutics, Sanofi, SPARK, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. DN reports research funding from Bayer; service on advisory boards for Alnylam, Aptevo, Bioverativ, Genentech, Octapharma; and service on speaker's bureaus for Octopharma, American Porphyria Foundation, BPL/Soleo Health, and Alnylam. ADL reports research funding from BioMarin and Pfizer; and service on advisory boards for BioMarin, CSL, Dova, and Pfizer. RSJ reports research funding from Takeda and Octapharma; and consulting with Sanofi/Sobi, Takeda, Octapharma, NovoNordisk, Bayer, Pfizer, Hema Biologics, Guardian Therapeutics, and Hemab Therapeutics. CP serves on advisory boards for Takeda, Hema Biologics, and Coagulant Therapeutics. RP receives honoraria from CSL Behring, Genentech, Bayer Healthcare, Hema Biologics, Instrumentation Laboratory, and Merck. APW serves on advisory boards of NovoNordisk, Hema Biologics, Takeda, Sanofi, Genentech, Octapharma, Pfizer, Bioverativ, Bayer, and Spark. RK serves on advisory boards of CSL Behring, Sanofi, NovoNordisk, and Pfizer. CS serves as a consultant to Genentech, Hema Biologics, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda. KJS reports research funding from Sanofi Pasteur. TCN reports research funding from Pfizer and Spark. ADA is currently an employee of Medtronic. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Blood. 2013 Aug 1;122(5):648-57
pubmed: 23777763
BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):320-2
pubmed: 10740326
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999 Dec;19(12):3055-62
pubmed: 10591687
Blood. 2022 Jul 14;140(2):89-98
pubmed: 35439298
Exp Ther Med. 2016 May;11(5):1923-1929
pubmed: 27168829
Haemophilia. 2016 May;22(3):397-402
pubmed: 26843404
Haemophilia. 2010 Sep 1;16(5):832-9
pubmed: 20584085
Blood. 2021 Jun 10;137(23):3277-3283
pubmed: 33556167
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010 Jul;36(5):510-21
pubmed: 20635317
Blood. 1987 Feb;69(2):454-9
pubmed: 3492222
Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):280-300
pubmed: 33570651
Blood. 2017 Nov 23;130(21):2344-2353
pubmed: 28916584
Lancet. 1996 Oct 12;348(9033):992-6
pubmed: 8855856
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9
pubmed: 11124729
Thromb Haemost. 2011 Oct;106(4):641-5
pubmed: 21833452
Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):301-325
pubmed: 33570647
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Feb 27;47(7):134-40
pubmed: 9498296
Haemophilia. 1999 Sep;5(5):313-7
pubmed: 10583512
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Blood. 2005 Jan 1;105(1):145-52
pubmed: 15331450
Blood. 2015 Oct 22;126(17):2038-46
pubmed: 26239086
J Lab Clin Med. 1992 Apr;119(4):420-7
pubmed: 1583394
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):734-9
pubmed: 2400752
Qual Life Res. 1995 Feb;4(1):33-40
pubmed: 7711689
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul;8(7):1492-9
pubmed: 20345712
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375(21):2067-2080
pubmed: 27959741
Blood. 1993 May 15;81(10):2644-51
pubmed: 8490173