Gastrointestinal failure, big data and intensive care.


Journal

Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care
ISSN: 1473-6519
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9804399

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2023
Historique:
medline: 4 8 2023
pubmed: 30 6 2023
entrez: 30 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Enteral feeding is the main route of administration of medical nutritional therapy in the critically ill. However, its failure is associated with increased complications. Machine learning and artificial intelligence have been used in intensive care to predict complications. The aim of this review is to explore the ability of machine learning to support decision making to ensure successful nutritional therapy. Numerous conditions such as sepsis, acute kidney injury or indication for mechanical ventilation can be predicted using machine learning. Recently, machine learning has been applied to explore how gastrointestinal symptoms in addition to demographic parameters and severity scores, can accurately predict outcomes and successful administration of medical nutritional therapy. With the rise of precision and personalized medicine for support of medical decisions, machine learning is gaining popularity in the field of intensive care, first not only to predict acute renal failure or indication for intubation but also to define the best parameters for recognizing gastrointestinal intolerance and to recognize patients intolerant to enteral feeding. Large data availability and improvement in data science will make machine learning an important tool to improve medical nutritional therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37389458
doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000961
pii: 00075197-990000000-00093
doi:

Types de publication

Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

476-481

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr 2019; 38:48–79.
Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Alhazzani W, et al. ESICM Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function. Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:380–398.
McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2016; 40:159–211.
Ortiz-Reyes L, Patel JJ, Jiang X, et al. Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial. Crit Care 2022; 26:173.
Matejovic M, Huet O, Dams K, et al. Medical nutrition therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill adults: a European multinational, prospective observational cohort study (EuroPN). Crit Care 2022; 26:143.
Berger MM, Pichard C. Feeding should be individualized in the critically ill patients. Curr Opin Crit Care 2019; 25:307–313.
Padilla PF, Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, et al. Early enteral nutrition (Within 48 h) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 h) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD012340.
(Kristine) Koekkoek WAC, van Setten (Coralien) CH, Olthof LE. Timing of PROTein INtake and clinical outcomes of adult critically ill patients on prolonged mechanical VENTilation: the PROTINVENT retrospective study. Clin Nutr 2019; 38:883–890.
Chapman M, Peake SL, et al. TARGET Investigators, for the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Energy-dense versus routine enteral nutrition in the critically ill. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:1823–1834.
Arunachala Murthy T, Chapple L-AS, Lange K, et al. Gastrointestinal dysfunction during enteral nutrition delivery in intensive care unit (ICU) patients: risk factors, natural history, and clinical implications. A posthoc analysis of The Augmented versus Routine approach to Giving Energy Trial (TARGET). Am J Clin Nutr 2022; 116:589–598.
Reitam BA, Starkopf J, Kirsimagi U, Deane AM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58:914–922.
Reitam BA, Padar M, Mandul M, Elke G. Development of the Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) for critically ill patients- a prospective multicenter observational study (iSOFA study). Clin Nutr 2021; 40:4932–4940.
Hu B, Sun R, Wu A, et al. Severity of acute gastrointestinal injury grade is a predictor of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Crit Care 2017; 21:188.
Loudet CI, Marchena MC, Tumino LI, et al. Prognostic capability of the maximum acute gastrointestinal injury score and of caloric intake in patients requiring vasopressors: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Critical Care 2020; 58:41–47.
Lindner M, Padar M, Mändul M, et al. Current practice of gastric residual volume measurements and related outcomes of critically ill patients - a secondary analysis of the iSOFA study. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2023; [Epub ahead of print].
Heyland DK, Ortiz A, Stoppe C, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical consequence of enteral feeding intolerance in the mechanically ventilated critically ill: an analysis of a multicenter, multiyear database. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:49–59.
Reintam Blaser A, Hiesmayr M. Enteral feeding, even when the gut does not feel very good? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2022; 25:122–128.
Jenkins B, Calder PC, Marino LV. A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2022; 49:92–102.
Chowdhury AH, Murray K, Hoad CL, et al. Effects of bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastric emptying, small bowel water content, superior mesenteric artery blood flow, and plasma hormone concentrations in healthy adults: a randomized crossover study. Ann Surg 2016; 263:450–457.
Lheureux O, Preiser JC. Is slower advancement of enteral feeding superior to aggressive full feeding regimens in the early phase of critical illness? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2020; 23:121–126.
Reignier J, Plantefeve G, Mira JP, et al. NUTRIREA-3 Trial Investigators; Clinical Research in Intensive Care; Sepsis (CRICS-TRIGGERSEP)Group. Low versus standard calorie and protein feeding in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial (NUTRIREA-3). Lancet Respir Med 2023.
Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang B, et al. Gastric-tube versus postpyloric feeding in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary aspiration- and nutrition-related outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2021; 75:1337–1348.
Liu MY, Tang HC, Hu SH, Chang SJ. Peptide-based enteral formula improves tolerance and clinical outcomes in abdominal surgery patients relative to a whole protein enteral formula. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:700–705.
Hong N, Liu C, Gao J, et al. State of the art of machine learning-enabled clinical decision support in intensive care units: literature review. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e28781.
Verma AA, Murray J, Greiner R, et al. Implementing machine learning in medicine. CMAJ 2021; 193:E1351–E1357.
Cerasa A, Tartarisco G, Bruschetta R, et al. Predicting outcome in patients with brain injury: differences between machine learning versus conventional statistics. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2267.
van de Sande D, van Genderen ME, Huiskens J, et al. Moving from bytes to bedside: a systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:750–760.
Liang Y, Zhu C, Tian C, et al. Early prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical care patients: a machine learning model. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:250.
Hu C, Tan Q, Zhang Q, et al. Application of interpretable machine learning for early prediction of prognosis in acute kidney injury. Comput Struct Biotech J 2022; 20:2861–2870.
Bendavid I, Statlender L, Shvartser L, et al. A novel machine learning model to predict respiratory failure and invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1–14.
Nourelahi M, Dadboud F, Khalili H, et al. A machine learning model for predicting favorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients after 6 months. Acute Crit Care 2022; 37:45–52.
Ko RE, Cho J, Shin MK, et al. Machine learning-based mortality prediction model for critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (CanICU). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:569.
Ikezawa K, Hirose M, Maruyama T, et al. Effect of early nutritional initiation on postcerebral infarction discharge destination: a propensity-matched analysis using machine learning. Nutr Diet 2022; 79:247–254.
Jiang S, Wang R, Zhang H. Integrated learning model-based assessment of enteral nutrition support in neurosurgical intensive care patients. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022:4061043.
Raphaeli, Hajaj C, Bendavid I, et al. Feeding intolerance as a predictor of clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a machine learning approach. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021; 46:S546–S547.
Raphaeli O, Hajaj C, Bendavid I, et al. Using machine learning to compare gastric residual volume thresholds as predictors of clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2021; 25: (Suppl 1): 76–77.
Hu K, Deng XL, Han L, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for feeding intolerance in intensive care unit patients with sepsis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:32–38.
Lu XM, Jia DS, Wang R, et al. Development of a prediction model for enteral feeding intolerance in intensive care unit patients: a prospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:1363–1374.
Raphaeli O, Hajaj, C, Bendavid, I et al. . (2021) Using machine learning to support early prediction of feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. ESICM LIVES 2021: Part 1 ICMx 9 (Suppl 1): 001285, 51.
Chen Q, Chen Y, Wang H, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for diarrhea in ICU patients with enteral nutrition: a retrospective cohort study. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 2023; 47:563–571.
Roimi M, Neuberger A, Shrot A, et al. Bar-Lavie Y: early diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit using machine-learning algorithms. Int Care Med 2020; 46:454–462.

Auteurs

Pierre Singer (P)

Herzlia Medical Center, Intensive Care Unit, Herzlia.
Critical Care Department and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah TIkva, affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.

Eyal Robinson (E)

Critical Care Department and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah TIkva, affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.

Orit Raphaeli (O)

Critical Care Department and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah TIkva, affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH