A new CAD/CAM tooth mobility simulating model for dental in vitro investigations.
CAD/CAM
Chewing simulation
Dental material
Tooth mobility
Tooth model
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
23
05
2023
accepted:
22
06
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
6
7
2023
entrez:
6
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To validate a new tooth mobility simulating in vitro model for biomechanical tests of dental appliances and restorations. Load-deflection curves for teeth in CAD/CAM models (n = 10/group, 6 teeth/model) of the anterior segment of a lower jaw with either low tooth mobility (LM) or high tooth mobility (HM) were recorded with a universal testing device and a Periotest device. All teeth were tested before and after different ageing protocols. Finally, vertical load capacity (F At F = 100 N load, vertical/horizontal tooth deflections before ageing were 80 ± 10 µm/400 ± 40 µm for LM models and 130 ± 20 µm/610 ± 100 µm for HM models. Periotest values were 1.6 ± 1.4 for LM models and 5.5 ± 1.5 for HM models. These values were within the range of physiological tooth mobility. No visible damage occurred during ageing and simulated ageing had no significant effect on tooth mobility. F The model is practical, easy to manufacture and can reliably simulate tooth mobility. The model was also validated for long-term testing, so is suitable for investigating various dental appliances and restorations such as retainers, brackets, dental bridges or trauma splints. Using this in-vitro model for high standardised investigations of various dental appliances and restorations can protect patients from unnecessary burdens in trials and practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37410153
doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05133-9
pii: 10.1007/s00784-023-05133-9
pmc: PMC10492759
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5131-5140Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Brosh T, Porat N, Vardimon AD, Pilo R (2011) Appropriateness of viscoelastic soft materials as in vitro simulators of the periodontal ligament. J Oral Rehabil 38:929–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02231.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02231.x
pubmed: 21707697
Rosentritt M, Behr M, Scharnagl P, Handel G, Kolbeck C (2011) Influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 24:465–468
pubmed: 21909489
Ang Y, Razali M, Yahaya N (2020) Tooth Mobility Reproduction in Dental Material Research: A Scoping Review. Open Dent J 14:465–473. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602014010465
doi: 10.2174/1874210602014010465
Berthold C, Auer FJ, Potapov S, Petschelt A (2011) Development of new artificial models for splint rigidity evaluation. Dent Traumatol 27:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01010.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01010.x
pubmed: 21615861
Erdelt KJ, Lamper T (2010) Development of a device to simulate tooth mobility. Biomed Tech (Berl) 55:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/BMT.2010.040
doi: 10.1515/BMT.2010.040
pubmed: 20840007
Al zahrani F, Richards L (2018) Micro-CT evaluation of a novel periodontal ligament simulation technique for dental experimental models. Arch Orofac Sci 13
Shirako T, Churei H, Wada T, Uo M, Ueno T (2017) Establishment of experimental models to evaluate the effectiveness of dental trauma splints. Dent Mater J 36:731–739. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-333
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-333
pubmed: 28652553
Sornkul E, Martel MH, Stannard JG (1990) In vitro study of cementation of cast splints on nonmobile and mobile teeth. Int J Prosthodont 3:449–456
pubmed: 2088382
Naumann M, von Stein-Lausnitz M, Rosentritt M, Walter C, Meyer-Luckel H, Sterzenbach G (2018) Impact of simulated reduced alveolar bone support, increased tooth mobility, and distal post-supported, root-treated abutment tooth on load capability of all-ceramic zirconia-supported cantilever FDP. Clin Oral Investig 22:2799–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2366-5
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2366-5
pubmed: 29404813
Nagayama T, Wada J, Watanabe C, Murakami N, Takakusaki K, Uchida H, Utsumi M, Wakabayashi N (2019) Influence of retainer and major connector designs of removable partial dentures on the stabilization of mobile teeth: A preliminary study. Dent Mater J. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-272
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-272
pubmed: 31582595
Zhu Y, Chen H, Cen L, Wang J (2016) Influence of abutment tooth position and adhesive point dimension on the rigidity of a dental trauma wire-composite splint. Dent Traumatol 32:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12241
doi: 10.1111/edt.12241
pubmed: 26511774
Soares PB, Fernandes Neto AJ, Magalhaes D, Versluis A, Soares CJ (2011) Effect of bone loss simulation and periodontal splinting on bone strain: Periodontal splints and bone strain. Arch Oral Biol 56:1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.04.002
pubmed: 21550587
Sterzenbach G, Tunjan R, Rosentritt M, Naumann M (2014) Increased tooth mobility because of loss of alveolar bone support: a hazard for zirconia two-unit cantilever resin-bonded FDPs in vitro? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:244–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33001
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33001
pubmed: 23997026
Sterzenbach G, Kalberlah S, Beuer F, Frankenberger R, Naumann M (2011) In-vitro simulation of tooth mobility for static and dynamic load tests: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand 69:316–318. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.563244
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.563244
pubmed: 21375428
Ben Hassan MW, Andersson L, Lucas PW (2016) Stiffness characteristics of splints for fixation of traumatized teeth. Dent Traumatol 32:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12234
doi: 10.1111/edt.12234
pubmed: 26449180
Park J-H, Shin J-H, Ryu J-J, Lee J-Y, Shin SW (2017) Flexibility of resin splint systems for traumatized teeth. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 55:389–393
doi: 10.4047/jkap.2017.55.4.389
Roser CJ, Rückschloß T, Zenthöfer A, Rammelsberg P, Lux CJ, Rues S (2022) Orthodontic shear bond strength and ultimate load tests of CAD/CAM produced artificial teeth. Clin Oral Invest. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04676-7
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04676-7
Chakrapani S, Goutham M, Krishnamohan T, Anuparthy S, Tadiboina N, Rambha S (2015) Periotest values: Its reproducibility, accuracy, and variability with hormonal influence. Contemp Clin Dent 6:12–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.149284
doi: 10.4103/0976-237x.149284
pubmed: 25684904
pmcid: 4319331
Schulte W, D’Hoedt B, Lukas D, Maunz M, Steppeler M (1992) Periotest for measuring periodontal characteristics–Correlation with periodontal bone loss. J Periodontal Res 27:184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01667.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1992.tb01667.x
pubmed: 1608031
Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B (2006) Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(Suppl 2):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x
pubmed: 16968377
Boldt J, Knapp W, Proff P, Rottner K, Richter EJ (2012) Measurement of tooth and implant mobility under physiological loading conditions. Ann Anat 194:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2011.09.007
doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.09.007
pubmed: 22074678
Roser CJ, Bauer C, Hodecker L, Zenthoefer A, Lux CJ, Rues S (2023) Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel Twistflex retainer: An in-vitro investigation of survival rate and stability. J Orofac Orthop (in print)
Kiliaridis S, Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Carlsson GE (1995) Craniofacial Morphology Occlusal Traits, and Bite Force in Persons with Advanced Occlusal Tooth Wear. Am J Orthod Dentofac 107:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70144-3
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70144-3
Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C (1993) The Relationship between Maximal Bite Force, Bite Force Endurance, and Facial Morphology during Growth - a Cross-Sectional Study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:323–331. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040583
doi: 10.3109/00016359309040583
pubmed: 8279273
Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM, Weijs WA, Naeije M (1988) A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 21:563–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9
doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9
pubmed: 3410859
Palinkas M, Nassar MS, Cecilio FA, Siessere S, Semprini M, Machado-de-Sousa JP, Hallak JE, Regalo SC (2010) Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol 55:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016
pubmed: 20667521
Takaki P, Vieira M, Bommarito S (2014) Maximum bite force analysis in different age groups. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18:272–276. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1374647
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374647
pubmed: 25992105
pmcid: 4297017