Conceptual and empirical bridges between micro- and macroevolution.
Journal
Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
13
06
2023
medline:
9
8
2023
pubmed:
11
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Explaining broad molecular, phenotypic and species biodiversity patterns necessitates a unifying framework spanning multiple evolutionary scales. Here we argue that although substantial effort has been made to reconcile microevolution and macroevolution, much work remains to identify the links between biological processes at play. We highlight four major questions of evolutionary biology whose solutions require conceptual bridges between micro and macroevolution. We review potential avenues for future research to establish how mechanisms at one scale (drift, mutation, migration, selection) translate to processes at the other scale (speciation, extinction, biogeographic dispersal) and vice versa. We propose ways in which current comparative methods to infer molecular evolution, phenotypic evolution and species diversification could be improved to specifically address these questions. We conclude that researchers are in a better position than ever before to build a synthesis to understand how microevolutionary dynamics unfold over millions of years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37429904
doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02116-7
pii: 10.1038/s41559-023-02116-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1181-1193Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Huxley, J. Evolution. The Modern Synthesis (George Allen & Unwin, 1942).
Harmon, L. J. et al. Causes and consequences of apparent timescaling across all estimated evolutionary rates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 587–609 (2021).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011921-023644
Charlesworth, B., Lande, R. & Slatkin, M. A neo‐Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36, 474–498 (1982).
pubmed: 28568049
Estes, S. & Arnold, S. J. Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am. Nat. 169, 227–244 (2007).
pubmed: 17211806
doi: 10.1086/510633
Hansen, T. F. & Martins, E. P. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50, 1404–1417 (1996).
pubmed: 28565714
doi: 10.2307/2410878
Reznick, D. N. & Ricklefs, R. E. Darwin’s bridge between microevolution and macroevolution. Nature 457, 837–842 (2009).
pubmed: 19212402
doi: 10.1038/nature07894
Rolland, J., Silvestro, D., Litsios, G., Faye, L. & Salamin, N. Clownfishes evolution below and above the species level. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20171796 (2018).
pubmed: 29467260
pmcid: 5832698
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1796
Arnold, S. J., Pfrender, M. E. & Jones, A. G. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112, 9–32 (2001).
pubmed: 11838790
doi: 10.1023/A:1013373907708
Singhal, S. et al. No link between population isolation and speciation rate in squamate reptiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2113388119 (2022).
pubmed: 35058358
pmcid: 8795558
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113388119
Rabosky, D. L. & Matute, D. R. Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15354–15359 (2013).
pubmed: 24003144
pmcid: 3780891
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305529110
Dynesius, M. & Jansson, R. Persistence of within‐species lineages: a neglected control of speciation rates. Evolution 68, 923–934 (2014).
pubmed: 24329123
doi: 10.1111/evo.12316
Alencar, L. R. V. D. & Quental, T. B. Linking population‐level and microevolutionary processes to understand speciation dynamics at the macroevolutionary scale. Ecol. Evol. 11, 5828–5843 (2021).
pubmed: 34141187
pmcid: 8207422
doi: 10.1002/ece3.7511
Hua, X., Herdha, T. & Burden, C. J. Protracted speciation under the state-dependent speciation and extinction approach. Syst. Biol. 71, 1362–1377 (2022).
pubmed: 35699529
pmcid: 9558848
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syac041
Simpson, G. G. Tempo and Mode in Evolution (Columbia Univ. Press, 1944).
Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change (Columbia Univ. Press, 1974).
Gould, S. J. & Eldredge, N. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3, 115–151 (1977).
doi: 10.1017/S0094837300005224
Hansen, T. F. & Houle, D. in Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes (eds Pigliucci, M. & Preston, K.) 130–150 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).
Haller, B. C. & Hendry, A. P. Solving the paradox of stasis: squashed stabilizing selection and the limits of detection. Evolution 68, 483–500 (2014).
pubmed: 24102172
doi: 10.1111/evo.12275
Ho, S. Y., Phillips, M. J., Cooper, A. & Drummond, A. J. Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1561–1568 (2005).
pubmed: 15814826
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi145
Ho, S. Y. et al. Time‐dependent rates of molecular evolution. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3087–3101 (2011).
pubmed: 21740474
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05178.x
Ho, S. Y., Duchêne, S., Molak, M. & Shapiro, B. Time‐dependent estimates of molecular evolutionary rates: evidence and causes. Mol. Ecol. 24, 6007–6012 (2015).
pubmed: 26769402
doi: 10.1111/mec.13450
Gingerich, P. D. Rates of Evolution: a Quantitative Synthesis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Magallon, S. & Sanderson, M. J. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55, 1762–1780 (2001).
pubmed: 11681732
Ricklefs, R. E. Evolutionary diversification and the origin of the diversity–environment relationship. Ecology 87, S3–S13 (2006).
pubmed: 16922298
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3:EDATOO]2.0.CO;2
McPeek, M. A. & Brown, J. M. Clade age and not diversification rate explains species richness among animal taxa. Am. Nat. 169, E97–E106 (2007).
pubmed: 17427118
doi: 10.1086/512135
Louca, S., Henao‐Diaz, L. F. & Pennell, M. The scaling of diversification rates with age is likely explained by sampling bias. Evolution 76, 1625–1637 (2022).
pubmed: 35567800
doi: 10.1111/evo.14515
Henao-Diaz, L. F., Harmon, L. J., Sugawara, M. T., Miller, E. T. & Pennell, M. W. Macroevolutionary diversification rates show time dependency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7403–7408 (2019).
pubmed: 30910958
pmcid: 6462100
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818058116
Yang Z. Computational Molecular Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Budd, G. E. & Mann, R. P. History is written by the victors: the effect of the push of the past on the fossil record. Evolution 72, 2276–2291 (2018).
pubmed: 30257040
pmcid: 6282550
doi: 10.1111/evo.13593
Nee, S., May, R. M. & Harvey, P. H. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344, 305–311 (1994).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0068
Jablonski, D., Roy, K., Valentine, J. W., Price, R. M. & Anderson, P. S. The impact of the pull of the recent on the history of marine diversity. Science 300, 1133–1135 (2003).
pubmed: 12750517
doi: 10.1126/science.1083246
Raup, D. M. Size of the Permo-Triassic bottleneck and its evolutionary implications. Science 206, 217–218 (1979).
pubmed: 17801788
doi: 10.1126/science.206.4415.217
Stadler, T. Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6187–6192 (2011).
pubmed: 21444816
pmcid: 3076834
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016876108
O’Meara, B. C. & Beaulieu J. M. Potential survival of some, but not all, diversification methods. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/w5nvd (2022).
Futuyma, D. J. On the role of species in anagenesis. Am. Nat. 130, 465–473 (1987).
doi: 10.1086/284724
Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution 64, 1865–1884 (2010).
pubmed: 20659157
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00960.x
Morlon, H., Parsons, T. L. & Plotkin, J. B. Reconciling molecular phylogenies with the fossil record. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16327–16332 (2011).
pubmed: 21930899
pmcid: 3182748
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102543108
Kostikova, A., Silvestro, D., Pearman, P. B. & Salamin, N. Bridging inter- and intraspecific trait evolution with a hierarchical Bayesian approach. Syst. Biol. 65, 417–431 (2016).
pubmed: 26911152
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw010
Gaboriau, T., Mendes, F. K., Joly, S., Silvestro, D. & Salamin, N. A multi‐platform package for the analysis of intra‐ and interspecific trait evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1439–1447 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13458
Silvestro, D., Salamin, N., Antonelli, A. & Meyer, X. Improved estimation of macroevolutionary rates from fossil data using a Bayesian framework. Paleobiology 45, 546–570 (2019).
doi: 10.1017/pab.2019.23
Etienne, R. S. & Rosindell, J. Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Syst. Biol. 61, 204–213 (2012).
pubmed: 21873376
pmcid: 3280041
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr091
De Maio, N., Schrempf, D. & Kosiol, C. PoMo: an allele frequency-based approach for species tree estimation. Syst. Biol. 64, 1018–1031 (2015).
pubmed: 26209413
pmcid: 4604832
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syv048
Slater, G. J., Harmon, L. J. & Alfaro, M. E. Integrating fossils with molecular phylogenies improves inference of trait evolution. Evolution 66, 3931–3944 (2012).
pubmed: 23206147
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x
Rolland, J. et al. The impact of endothermy on the climatic niche evolution and the distribution of vertebrate diversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 459–464 (2018).
pubmed: 29379185
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0451-9
Silvestro, D., Warnock, R., Gavryushkina, A. & Stadler, T. Closing the gap between palaeontological and neontological speciation and extinction rate estimates. Nat. Commun. 9, 5237 (2018).
pubmed: 30532040
pmcid: 6286320
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07622-y
Mitchell, J. S., Etienne, R. S. & Rabosky, D. L. Inferring diversification rate variation from phylogenies with fossils. Syst. Biol. 68, 1–18 (2019).
pubmed: 29788398
Černý, D., Madzia, D. & Slater, G. J. Empirical and methodological challenges to the model-based inference of diversification rates in extinct clades. Syst. Biol. 71, 153–171 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab045
Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Finnegan, S. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504 (2013).
pubmed: 23908227
doi: 10.1126/science.1237184
Duchen, P., Alfaro, M., Rolland, J., Salamin, N. & Silvestro, D. On the effect of asymmetrical trait inheritance on models of trait evolution. Syst. Biol. 70, 376–388 (2021).
pubmed: 32681798
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa055
Voje, K. L., Di Martino, E. & Porto, A. Revisiting a landmark study system: no evidence for a punctuated mode of evolution in Metrarabdotos. Am. Nat. 195, 899–917 (2020).
pubmed: 32364786
doi: 10.1086/707664
Brombacher, A., Wilson, P. A., Bailey, I. & Ezard, T. H. G. The breakdown of static and evolutionary allometries during climatic upheaval. Evolution 190, 299–450 (2017).
Hunt, G. The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18404–18408 (2007).
pubmed: 18003931
pmcid: 2141789
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704088104
Voje, K. L. Testing eco‐evolutionary predictions using fossil data: phyletic evolution following ecological opportunity. Evolution 74, 188–200 (2020).
pubmed: 31461158
doi: 10.1111/evo.13838
Webster, M. Morphological homeostasis in the fossil record. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 88, 91–104 (2019).
pubmed: 29787861
doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.016
Fox, J. W. & Lenski, R. E. From here to eternity—the theory and practice of a really long experiment. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002185 (2015).
pubmed: 26102073
pmcid: 4477892
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002185
Fenton, I. S. et al. Triton, a new species-level database of Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal occurrences. Sci. Data 8, 160 (2021).
pubmed: 34183675
pmcid: 8239019
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00942-7
Fan, J. X. et al. A high-resolution summary of Cambrian to Early Triassic marine invertebrate biodiversity. Science 367, 272–277 (2020).
pubmed: 31949075
doi: 10.1126/science.aax4953
Lambert, D. M. et al. Rates of evolution in ancient DNA from Adelie penguins. Science 295, 2270–2273 (2002).
pubmed: 11910113
doi: 10.1126/science.1068105
Hay, J. M. et al. Rapid molecular evolution in a living fossil. Trends Genet. 24, 106–109 (2008).
pubmed: 18255186
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.002
Kirch, M., Romundset, A., Gilbert, M. T. P., Jones, F. C. & Foote, A. D. Ancient and modern stickleback genomes reveal the demographic constraints on adaptation. Curr. Biol. 31, 2027–2036 (2021).
pubmed: 33705715
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.02.027
Uyeda, J. C., Hansen, T. F., Arnold, S. J. & Pienaar, J. The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15908–15913 (2011).
pubmed: 21873251
pmcid: 3179053
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014503108
Landis, M. J. & Schraiber, J. G. Pulsed evolution shaped modern vertebrate body sizes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13224–13229 (2017).
pubmed: 29114046
pmcid: 5740653
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710920114
Pagel, M., O’Donovan, C. & Meade, A. General statistical model shows that macroevolutionary patterns and processes are consistent with Darwinian gradualism. Nat. Commun. 13, 1113 (2022).
pubmed: 35236836
pmcid: 8891346
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28595-z
Condamine, F. L., Rolland, J. & Morlon, H. Assessing the causes of diversification slowdowns: temperature‐dependent and diversity‐dependent models receive equivalent support. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1900–1912 (2019).
pubmed: 31486279
doi: 10.1111/ele.13382
Moen, D. & Morlon, H. Why does diversification slow down? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 190–197 (2014).
pubmed: 24612774
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.010
Amemiya, C. T. et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311–316 (2013).
pubmed: 23598338
pmcid: 3633110
doi: 10.1038/nature12027
Gemmell, N. J. et al. The tuatara genome reveals ancient features of amniote evolution. Nature 584, 403–409 (2020).
pubmed: 32760000
pmcid: 7116210
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2561-9
Zhan, S. H., Otto, S. P. & Barker, M. S. Broad variation in rates of polyploidy and dysploidy across flowering plants is correlated with lineage diversification. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.30.436382 (2021).
Merilä, J. & Crnokrak, P. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 892–903 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00348.x
Merilä, J. & Hendry, A. P. Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol. Appl. 7, 1–14 (2014).
pubmed: 24454544
pmcid: 3894893
doi: 10.1111/eva.12137
Pujol, B. et al. The missing response to selection in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 337–346 (2018).
pubmed: 29628266
pmcid: 5937857
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007
Bonnet, T. et al. Genetic variance in fitness indicates rapid contemporary adaptive evolution in wild animals. Science 376, 1012–1016 (2022).
pubmed: 35617403
doi: 10.1126/science.abk0853
Bonamour, S., Teplitsky, C., Charmantier, A., Crochet, P. A. & Chevin, L. M. Selection on skewed characters and the paradox of stasis. Evolution 71, 2703–2713 (2017).
pubmed: 28921508
pmcid: 5959001
doi: 10.1111/evo.13368
Schluter, D. & Grant, P. R. Determinants of morphological patterns in communities of Darwin’s finches. Am. Nat. 123, 175–196 (1984).
doi: 10.1086/284196
Voje, K. L. Tempo does not correlate with mode in the fossil record. Evolution 70, 2678–2689 (2016).
pubmed: 27748958
doi: 10.1111/evo.13090
Mustonen, V. & Lässig, M. From fitness landscapes to seascapes: non-equilibrium dynamics of selection and adaptation. Trends Genet. 25, 111–119 (2009).
pubmed: 19232770
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.01.002
Payne, J. L. & Wagner, A. The causes of evolvability and their evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 24–38 (2019).
pubmed: 30385867
doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0069-z
Hansen, T. F. in The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology (eds Svensson, E. & Calsbeek, R.) Ch. 13 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).
Rolland, J., Jiguet, F., Jønsson, K. A., Condamine, F. L. & Morlon, H. Settling down of seasonal migrants promotes bird diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140473 (2014).
pubmed: 24759866
pmcid: 4043101
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0473
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).
pubmed: 24362564
doi: 10.1038/nature12872
Hirt, M. R., Jetz, W., Rall, B. C. & Brose, U. A general scaling law reveals why the largest animals are not the fastest. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1116–1122 (2017).
pubmed: 29046579
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0241-4
Araújo, M. B. et al. Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1206–1219 (2013).
pubmed: 23869696
doi: 10.1111/ele.12155
Martin, C. H. & Wainwright, P. C. Multiple fitness peaks on the adaptive landscape drive adaptive radiation in the wild. Science 339, 208–211 (2013).
pubmed: 23307743
doi: 10.1126/science.1227710
Schluter, D. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50, 1766–1774 (1996).
pubmed: 28565589
doi: 10.2307/2410734
Butler, M. A. & King, A. A. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164, 683–695 (2004).
pubmed: 29641928
doi: 10.1086/426002
Boucher, F. C. & Démery, V. Inferring bounded evolution in phenotypic characters from phylogenetic comparative data. Syst. Biol. 65, 651–661 (2016).
pubmed: 26865274
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw015
Mahler, D. L., Ingram, T., Revell, L. J. & Losos, J. B. Exceptional convergence on the macroevolutionary landscape in island lizard radiations. Science 341, 292–295 (2013).
pubmed: 23869019
doi: 10.1126/science.1232392
FitzJohn, R. G. Quantitative traits and diversification. Syst. Biol. 59, 619–633 (2010).
pubmed: 20884813
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq053
Gould, S. J. Gulliver’s further travels: the necessity and difficulty of a hierarchical theory of selection. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 307–314 (1998).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0211
Rabosky, D. L. & McCune, A. R. Reinventing species selection with molecular phylogenies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 68–74 (2010).
pubmed: 19740566
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.002
Martins, M. J. F., Puckett, T. M., Lockwood, R., Swaddle, J. P. & Hunt, G. High male sexual investment as a driver of extinction in fossil ostracods. Nature 556, 366–369 (2018).
pubmed: 29643505
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0020-7
McGlothlin, J. W. et al. Adaptive radiation along a deeply conserved genetic line of least resistance in Anolis lizards. Evol. Lett. 2, 310–322 (2018).
pubmed: 30283684
pmcid: 6121822
doi: 10.1002/evl3.72
Houle, D., Bolstad, G. H., van der Linde, K. & Hansen, T. F. Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution. Nature 548, 447–450 (2017).
pubmed: 28792935
doi: 10.1038/nature23473
Zalts, H. & Yanai, I. Developmental constraints shape the evolution of the nematode mid-developmental transition. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0113 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0113
Pennell, M. W., Harmon, L. J. & Uyeda, J. C. Is there room for punctuated equilibrium in macroevolution? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 23–32 (2014).
pubmed: 23978567
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.004
Hunt, G. Testing the link between phenotypic evolution and speciation: an integrated palaeontological and phylogenetic analysis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 714–723 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12085
Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (OUP, 2000).
Rabosky, D. L. et al. Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1958 (2013).
pubmed: 23739623
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2958
Erwin, D. H., Valentine, J. W. & Sepkoski, J. J. A comparative study of diversification events: the early Paleozoic versus the Mesozoic. Evolution 41, 1177–1186 (1987).
pubmed: 28563606
doi: 10.2307/2409086
Parins-Fukuchi, C., Stull, G. W. & Smith, S. A. Phylogenomic conflict coincides with rapid morphological innovation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023058118 (2021).
pubmed: 33941696
pmcid: 8126787
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023058118
Stull, G. W. et al. Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms. Nat. Plants 7, 1015–1025 (2021).
pubmed: 34282286
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4
Schluter, D. & Rieseberg, L. H. Three problems in the genetics of speciation by selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2122153119 (2022).
pubmed: 35858397
pmcid: 9335311
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122153119
Anderson, S. A. & Weir, J. T. Character displacement drives trait divergence in a continental fauna. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021209118 (2021).
pubmed: 33963076
pmcid: 8157990
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021209118
Germain, R. M. et al. On the origin of coexisting species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 284–293 (2021).
pubmed: 33353727
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.006
Venditti, C. & Pagel, M. Speciation as an active force in promoting genetic evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 14–20 (2010).
pubmed: 19720426
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.010
Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. Speciation (Sinauer, 2004).
Rundell, R. J. & Price, T. D. Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 394–399 (2009).
pubmed: 19409647
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.007
Rabosky, D. L. Phylogenetic tests for evolutionary innovation: the problematic link between key innovations and exceptional diversification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 372, 20160417 (2017).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0417
Lanfear, R., Ho, S. Y., Love, D. & Bromham, L. Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20423–20428 (2010).
pubmed: 21059910
pmcid: 2996675
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007888107
Dowle, E. J., Morgan-Richards, M. & Trewick, S. A. Molecular evolution and the latitudinal biodiversity gradient. Heredity 110, 501–510 (2013).
pubmed: 23486082
pmcid: 3656639
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.4
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771–1789 (2004).
doi: 10.1890/03-9000
Orton, M. G., May, J. A., Ly, W., Lee, D. J. & Adamowicz, S. J. Is molecular evolution faster in the tropics? Heredity 122, 513–524 (2019).
pubmed: 30202084
doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0141-7
Hull, P. M. & Norris, R. D. Evidence for abrupt speciation in a classic case of gradual evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21224–21229 (2009).
pubmed: 19996180
pmcid: 2795541
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902887106
Franks, S. J., Hamann, E. & Weis, A. E. Using the resurrection approach to understand contemporary evolution in changing environments. Evol. Appl. 11, 17–28 (2018).
pubmed: 29302269
doi: 10.1111/eva.12528
Goldberg, E. E. & Igić, B. Tempo and mode in plant breeding system evolution. Evolution 66, 3701–3709 (2012).
pubmed: 23206129
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01730.x
Wright, A. M., Bapst, D. W., Barido-Sottani, J. & Warnock, R. C. Integrating fossil observations into phylogenetics using the fossilized birth–death model. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 53, 251–273 (2022).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102220-030855
Manceau, M., Marin, J., Morlon, H. & Lambert, A. Model-based inference of punctuated molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 3308–3323 (2020).
pubmed: 32521005
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa144
Obermeyer, F. et al. Analysis of 6.4 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes identifies mutations associated with fitness. Science 376, 1327–1332 (2022).
pubmed: 35608456
doi: 10.1126/science.abm1208
Weber, M. G., Wagner, C. E., Best, R. J., Harmon, L. J. & Matthews, B. Evolution in a community context: on integrating ecological interactions and macroevolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 291–304 (2017).
pubmed: 28215448
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.01.003
Aristide, L. & Morlon, H. Understanding the effect of competition during evolutionary radiations: an integrated model of phenotypic and species diversification. Ecol. Lett. 22, 2006–2017 (2019).
pubmed: 31507039
doi: 10.1111/ele.13385
Nuismer, S. L. & Harmon, L. J. Predicting rates of interspecific interaction from phylogenetic trees. Ecol. Lett. 18, 17–27 (2015).
pubmed: 25349102
doi: 10.1111/ele.12384
Harmon, L. J. et al. Detecting the macroevolutionary signal of species interactions. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 769–782 (2019).
pubmed: 30968509
doi: 10.1111/jeb.13477
Blasco-Costa, I., Hayward, A., Poulin, R. & Balbuena, J. A. Next-generation cophylogeny: unravelling eco-evolutionary processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 907–918 (2021).
pubmed: 34243958
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.006
Hembry, D. H. & Weber, M. G. Ecological interactions and macroevolution: a new field with old roots. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 51, 215–243 (2020).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-121505
Phillimore, A. B. & Price, T. D. Density-dependent cladogenesis in birds. PLoS Biol. 6, e71 (2008).
pubmed: 18366256
pmcid: 2270327
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060071
Morlon, H., Potts, M. D. & Plotkin, J. B. Inferring the dynamics of diversification: a coalescent approach. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000493 (2010).
pubmed: 20927410
pmcid: 2946937
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000493
Liow, L. H., Reitan, T. & Harnik, P. G. Ecological interactions on macroevolutionary time scales: clams and brachiopods are more than ships that pass in the night. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1030–1039 (2015).
pubmed: 26293753
doi: 10.1111/ele.12485
Silvestro, D., Antonelli, A., Salamin, N. & Quental, T. B. The role of clade competition in the diversification of North American canids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8684–8689 (2015).
pubmed: 26124128
pmcid: 4507235
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502803112
Condamine, F. L., Silvestro, D., Koppelhus, E. B. & Antonelli, A. The rise of angiosperms pushed conifers to decline during global cooling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28867–28875 (2020).
pubmed: 33139543
pmcid: 7682372
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005571117
Harmon, L. J. & Harrison, S. Species diversity is dynamic and unbounded at local and continental scales. Am. Nat. 185, 584–593 (2015).
pubmed: 25905502
doi: 10.1086/680859
Rabosky, D. L. & Hurlbert, A. H. Species richness at continental scales is dominated by ecological limits. Am. Nat. 185, 572–583 (2015).
pubmed: 25905501
doi: 10.1086/680850
Etienne, R. S. et al. Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1300–1309 (2012).
pubmed: 21993508
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1439
Etienne, R. S. & Haegeman, B. A conceptual and statistical framework for adaptive radiations with a key role for diversity dependence. Am. Nat. 180, E75–E89 (2012).
pubmed: 22976017
doi: 10.1086/667574
Rabosky, D. L. Diversity-dependence, ecological speciation, and the role of competition in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 481–502 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135800
Harmon, L. J., Schulte, J. A., Larson, A. & Losos, J. B. Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in iguanian lizards. Science 301, 961–964 (2003).
pubmed: 12920297
doi: 10.1126/science.1084786
Tobias, J. A. et al. Species coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation. Nature 506, 359–363 (2014).
pubmed: 24362572
doi: 10.1038/nature12874
Drury, J. P. et al. Tempo and mode of morphological evolution are decoupled from latitude in birds. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001270 (2021).
pubmed: 34428214
pmcid: 8384433
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001270
Carvalho, M. R. et al. Extinction at the end-Cretaceous and the origin of modern Neotropical rainforests. Science 372, 63–68 (2021).
pubmed: 33795451
doi: 10.1126/science.abf1969
Reitan, T., Schweder, T. & Henderiks, J. Phenotypic evolution studied by layered stochastic differential equations. Ann. Appl. Stat. 6, 1531–1551 (2012).
doi: 10.1214/12-AOAS559
Xu, L., Van Doorn, S., Hildenbrandt, H. & Etienne, R. S. Inferring the effect of species interactions on trait evolution. Syst. Biol. 70, 463–479 (2021).
pubmed: 32960972
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa072
Tóth, A. B. et al. Reorganization of surviving mammal communities after the end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Science 365, 1305–1308 (2019).
pubmed: 31604240
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1605
Luo, M., Ji, Y., Warton, D. & Yu, D. W. Extracting abundance information from DNA‐based data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23, 174–189 (2023).
pubmed: 35986714
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13703
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475, 493–496 (2011).
pubmed: 21753753
pmcid: 3154645
doi: 10.1038/nature10231
Ferriere, R. & Legendre, S. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks, adaptive dynamics and evolutionary rescue theory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368, 20120081 (2013).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0081
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).
Arditti, J., Elliott, J., Kitching, I. J. & Wasserthal, L. T. ‘Good Heavens what insect can suck it’—Charles Darwin, Angraecum sesquipedale and Xanthopan morganii praedicta. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 169, 403–432 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01250.x
Harvey, M. G. et al. Positive association between population genetic differentiation and speciation rates in New World birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6328–6333 (2017).
pubmed: 28559330
pmcid: 5474768
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617397114
Freeman, B. G., Strimas-Mackey, M. & Miller, E. T. Interspecific competition limits bird species’ ranges in tropical mountains. Science 377, 416–420 (2022).
pubmed: 35862538
doi: 10.1126/science.abl7242
FitzJohn, R. G. Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 1084–1092 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00234.x
Freeman, B. G., Rolland, J., Montgomery, G. A. & Schluter, D. Faster evolution of a premating reproductive barrier is not associated with faster speciation rates in New World passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20211514 (2022).
pubmed: 34982949
pmcid: 8727149
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1514
Rolland, J., Schluter, D. & Romiguier, J. Vulnerability to fishing and life history traits correlate with the load of deleterious mutations in teleosts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 2192–2196 (2020).
pubmed: 32163146
pmcid: 7403610
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa067
Ogbunugafor, C. B., Wylie, C. S., Diakite, I., Weinreich, D. M. & Hartl, D. L. Adaptive landscape by environment interactions dictate evolutionary dynamics in models of drug resistance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004710 (2016).
pubmed: 26808374
pmcid: 4726534
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004710
Lewontin, R. C. The units of selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1, 1–18 (1970).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.000245
Pimiento, C. et al. Selective extinction against redundant species buffers functional diversity. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20201162 (2020).
pubmed: 32693723
pmcid: 7423665
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1162
Vrba, E. S. & Gould, S. J. The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology 12, 217–228 (1986).
doi: 10.1017/S0094837300013671
Erwin, D. H. Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution. Evol. Dev. 2, 78–84 (2000).
pubmed: 11258393
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00045.x
Gould, S. J. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (WW Norton & Company, 1989).
Blount, Z. D., Lenski, R. E. & Losos, J. B. Contingency and determinism in evolution: replaying life’s tape. Science 362, eaam5979 (2018).
pubmed: 30409860
doi: 10.1126/science.aam5979
Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296, 707–711 (2002).
pubmed: 11976447
doi: 10.1126/science.1070315
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R. & Pennell, M. W. Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 67, 1091–1109 (2018).
pubmed: 29701838
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy031
Li, J., Huang, J. P., Sukumaran, J. & Knowles, L. L. Microevolutionary processes impact macroevolutionary patterns. BMC Evol. Biol. 18, 123 (2018).
pubmed: 30097006
pmcid: 6086068
doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1236-8