Comparative Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant vs Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Ocrelizumab in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Journal
JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2023
01 07 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
15
05
2024
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
12
7
2023
entrez:
12
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is available for treatment of highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). To compare the effectiveness of AHSCT vs fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting MS by emulating pairwise trials. This comparative treatment effectiveness study included 6 specialist MS centers with AHSCT programs and international MSBase registry between 2006 and 2021. The study included patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with AHSCT, fingolimod, natalizumab, or ocrelizumab with 2 or more years study follow-up including 2 or more disability assessments. Patients were matched on a propensity score derived from clinical and demographic characteristics. AHSCT vs fingolimod, natalizumab, or ocrelizumab. Pairwise-censored groups were compared on annualized relapse rates (ARR) and freedom from relapses and 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score worsening and improvement. Of 4915 individuals, 167 were treated with AHSCT; 2558, fingolimod; 1490, natalizumab; and 700, ocrelizumab. The prematch AHSCT cohort was younger and with greater disability than the fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab cohorts; the matched groups were closely aligned. The proportion of women ranged from 65% to 70%, and the mean (SD) age ranged from 35.3 (9.4) to 37.1 (10.6) years. The mean (SD) disease duration ranged from 7.9 (5.6) to 8.7 (5.4) years, EDSS score ranged from 3.5 (1.6) to 3.9 (1.9), and frequency of relapses ranged from 0.77 (0.94) to 0.86 (0.89) in the preceding year. Compared with the fingolimod group (769 [30.0%]), AHSCT (144 [86.2%]) was associated with fewer relapses (ARR: mean [SD], 0.09 [0.30] vs 0.20 [0.44]), similar risk of disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% CI, 0.91-3.17), and higher chance of disability improvement (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.71-4.26) over 5 years. Compared with natalizumab (730 [49.0%]), AHSCT (146 [87.4%]) was associated with marginally lower ARR (mean [SD], 0.08 [0.31] vs 0.10 [0.34]), similar risk of disability worsening (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.54-2.09), and higher chance of disability improvement (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.72-4.18) over 5 years. AHSCT (110 [65.9%]) and ocrelizumab (343 [49.0%]) were associated with similar ARR (mean [SD], 0.09 [0.34] vs 0.06 [0.32]), disability worsening (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.61-5.08), and disability improvement (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.66-2.82) over 3 years. AHSCT-related mortality occurred in 1 of 159 patients (0.6%). In this study, the association of AHSCT with preventing relapses and facilitating recovery from disability was considerably superior to fingolimod and marginally superior to natalizumab. This study did not find evidence for difference in the effectiveness of AHSCT and ocrelizumab over a shorter available follow-up time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37437240
pii: 2805036
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1184
pmc: PMC10186210
doi:
Substances chimiques
Natalizumab
0
ocrelizumab
A10SJL62JY
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
G926EC510T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
702-713Investigateurs
Dana Horakova
(D)
Katherine Buzzard
(K)
Murat Terzi
(M)
Alexandre Prat
(A)
Marc Girard
(M)
Pierre Grammond
(P)
Michael Barnett
(M)
Grace Stewart
(G)
Marco Onofrj
(M)
Guillermo Izquierdo
(G)
Sara Eichau
(S)
Francois Grand'Maison
(F)
Julie Prevost
(J)
Bart Van Wijmeersch
(B)
Maria Pia Amato
(MP)
Vahid Shaygannejad
(V)
Cavit Boz
(C)
Ricardo Fernandez Bolaños
(RF)
Aysun Soysal
(A)
Cristina Ramo-Tello
(C)
Claudio Solaro
(C)
Claudio Gobbi
(C)
Jose Antonio Cabrera-Gomez
(JA)
Etienne Roullet
(E)
Cees Zwanikken
(C)
Leontien Den Braber-Moerland
(L)
Norma Deri
(N)
Maria Laura Saladino
(ML)
Edgardo Cristiano
(E)
Juan Ignacio Rojas
(JI)
Carlos Vrech
(C)
Cameron Shaw
(C)
Neil Shuey
(N)
Mike Boggild
(M)
Ik Lin Tan
(IL)
Todd Hardy
(T)
Danny Decoo
(D)
Fraser Moore
(F)
Jiwon Oh
(J)
Patrice Lalive
(P)
Radek Ampapa
(R)
Thor Petersen
(T)
Celia Oreja-Guevara
(C)
Angel Perez Sempere
(A)
Jose Andres Dominguez
(JA)
Sarah Besora
(S)
Stella Hughes
(S)
Orla Gray
(O)
Nikolaos Grigoriadis
(N)
Imre Piroska
(I)
Csilla Rozsa
(C)
Krisztian Kasa
(K)
Magdolna Simo
(M)
Krisztina Kovacs
(K)
Attila Sas
(A)
Eniko Dobos
(E)
Cecilia Rajda
(C)
Chris McGuigan
(C)
Deborah Mason
(D)
Jan Schepel
(J)
Jabir Alkhaboori
(J)
Maria Edite Rio
(ME)
Simu Mihaela
(S)
Talal Al-Harbi
(T)
Ayse Altintas
(A)
Ilya Kister
(I)
Mark Marriott
(M)
Trevor Kilpatrick
(T)
John King
(J)
Ai-Lan Nguyen
(AL)
Chris Dwyer
(C)
Mastura Monif
(M)
Izanne Roos
(I)
Lisa Taylor
(L)
Matteo Diamanti
(M)
Clara Chisari
(C)
Simona Toscano
(S)
Lo Fermo Salvatore
(LF)
Catherine Larochelle
(C)
Giovanna De Luca
(G)
Valeria Di Tommaso
(V)
Daniela Travaglini
(D)
Erika Pietrolongo
(E)
Maria di Ioia
(M)
Deborah Farina
(D)
Luca Mancinelli
(L)
Raymond Hupperts
(R)
Javier Olascoaga
(J)
Albert Saiz
(A)
Robert Zivadinov
(R)
Ralph Benedict
(R)
Freek Verheul
(F)
Marzena Fabis-Pedrini
(M)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Feb;55(2):283-306
pubmed: 31558790
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):647-655
pubmed: 27481209
Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3275-86
pubmed: 26362907
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64
pubmed: 26994063
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):320-327
pubmed: 29309484
Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3287-98
pubmed: 26359291
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Jul;13(7):391-405
pubmed: 28621766
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Aug;16(8):1076-83
pubmed: 20304084
Eur J Neurol. 2011 Feb;18(2):240-245
pubmed: 20561044
BMJ. 2022 Jun 9;377:e061514
pubmed: 35680142
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;55(7):1473-1475
pubmed: 31745252
Mult Scler. 2020 Feb;26(2):161-162
pubmed: 31478793
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):165-174
pubmed: 30644983
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Apr 01;74(4):459-469
pubmed: 28241268
Ann Neurol. 2015 Mar;77(3):425-35
pubmed: 25546031
Neurology. 2022 Oct 25;99(17):e1926-e1944
pubmed: 35977837
Mult Scler. 2016 Nov;22(13):1642-1648
pubmed: 27270498
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Jan;17(1):3-4
pubmed: 32929227
Ann Neurol. 2005 Dec;58(6):840-6
pubmed: 16283615
Neurology. 2017 Feb 28;88(9):842-852
pubmed: 28148635
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;85(10):1116-21
pubmed: 24554104
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Apr;16(4):271-281
pubmed: 28209331
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 May;90(5):514-521
pubmed: 30538138
Mult Scler. 2010 Jun;16(6):685-93
pubmed: 20350962
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1197-1204
pubmed: 34398221
JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):275-84
pubmed: 25602998
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965 Mar 31;122:552-68
pubmed: 14313512
Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):621-625
pubmed: 30179270
Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):981-8
pubmed: 25672923
Neurology. 2020 Oct 6;95(14):e1999-e2008
pubmed: 32727835
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1345-1348
pubmed: 34596980
Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):576-85
pubmed: 27291994
Neurology. 2016 Feb 23;86(8):771-8
pubmed: 26826205