Trends and outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK and a survey of practices.
Adult
Humans
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ adverse effects
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ surgery
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Risk Factors
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Aortic valve replacement
Coronary artery bypass grafting
Coronary artery disease
Valve disease
Journal
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
ISSN: 1873-734X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804069
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 10 2023
04 10 2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
revised:
03
07
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
18
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Concomitant revascularization of coronary artery disease at the same time as treatment for aortic valvopathy favourably impacts survival. However, combined surgery may be associated with increased adverse outcomes compared to aortic valve replacement (AVR) or coronary artery bypass grafting in isolation. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent AVR with bypass grafting between February 1996 and March 2019 using data from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit. We used a generalized mixed-effects model to assess the effect of the number and type of bypass grafts associated with surgical AVR on in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and the need for renal dialysis. Furthermore, we conducted an international cross-sectional survey of cardiac surgeons to explore their views about concomitant AVR with coronary bypass grafting interventions. Fifty-one thousand two hundred and seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patients receiving 2 or more bypass grafts demonstrated more significant preoperative comorbidity and disease severity. Patients undergoing 2 and >2 grafts in addition to AVR had increased mortality as compared to patients undergoing AVR and only 1 graft [odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05-1.30], P = 0.005 and OR 1.15, 95% CI [1.02-1.30], P = 0.024 respectively]. A single arterial conduit was associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.68-0.82], P < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (OR 0.87, 95% CI [0.78-0.96], P = 0.006), but this association was lost with >1 arterial conduit. One hundred and three surgeons responded to our survey, with only a small majority believing that the number of bypass grafts can influence short- or long-term postoperative outcomes in these patients, and an almost equal split in responders supporting the use of staged or hybrid interventions for patients with concomitant pathology. The number of grafts performed during combined AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The use of an arterial graft was also associated with reduced mortality. Future studies are needed to assess the effect of incomplete revascularization and measure long-term outcomes. Based on our data, current published evidence, and the collective expert opinion we gathered, we endorse future work to investigate the short and long-term efficacy and safety of hybrid intervention for patients with concomitant advanced coronary and aortic valve disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37462523
pii: 7225851
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad259
pmc: PMC10580967
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Références
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 05;7:100131
pubmed: 34557840
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul 9;35(2):
pubmed: 35723556
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 28;11(10):e046491
pubmed: 34711589
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):79-86
pubmed: 27820610
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):4-90
pubmed: 30165632
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 15;104(12):1717-21
pubmed: 19962482
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):921-9
pubmed: 17307434
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):801-9
pubmed: 26680310
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):634-9
pubmed: 22154788
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):799-809
pubmed: 31995682
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jan 4;45(1):14-8
pubmed: 15629366
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 May;15(5):875-887
pubmed: 35216930
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Mar;85(3):921-30
pubmed: 18291172
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259
pubmed: 29785878
J Heart Valve Dis. 1993 Jul;2(4):430-9
pubmed: 8269146
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006368
pubmed: 29848611
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):18-28
pubmed: 34338767
Cardiology. 2011;119(2):116-23
pubmed: 21912125
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1604-9
pubmed: 24657032
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):449-456
pubmed: 34448848
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e013260
pubmed: 31438770
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):2032-7
pubmed: 25865767
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jul;10(1):66-72
pubmed: 3496372
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar 31;34(4):532-539
pubmed: 34788460