Comparative performance of microbiological methods for the detection of tuberculous meningitis pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid.
Cerebrospinal fluid
Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Tuberculosis meningitis
Xpert MTB/RIF
Journal
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
ISSN: 1879-0070
Titre abrégé: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8305899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
02
05
2023
revised:
11
06
2023
accepted:
09
07
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
23
7
2023
entrez:
22
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), Acid-fast bacillus stain (AFB), MGIT960 culture, polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), and Xpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). A cohort of 280 patients who presented with suspected TBM (ie, headache or altered mental status with clinical signs of meningism) were analyzed. The sensitivities of the 5 assays for the diagnosis of TBM ranged from 10.0% to 70.0%. The AFB had the lowest sensitivity of 10.0% (0.5-45.9), while mNGS and PCR had the highest sensitivity, both at 70.0% (35.4-91.9). mNGS demonstrated a distinct advantage in identifying a wider array of pathogens, including viruses, in CSF samples. PCR was a cost-effective option with excellent sensitivity and specificity. However, no single method was statistically significantly better than any other in the diagnosis of TBM. New diagnostic techniques are urgently needed for the independent, rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to guide the diagnosis of TBM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37480620
pii: S0732-8893(23)00135-9
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116025
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116025Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.