Mirabegron and Anticholinergics in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Meta-analysis.
Mirabegron e anticolinérgicos no tratamento da síndrome da bexiga hiperativa: metanálise.
Journal
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
ISSN: 1806-9339
Titre abrégé: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 9214757
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
medline:
28
7
2023
pubmed:
26
7
2023
entrez:
26
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the use of mirabegron with anticholinergics drugs for the treatment of overactive bladder (OB). Systematic searches were conducted in EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane, and LILACS databases from inception to September 2021. We included RCTs, women with clinically proven OB symptoms, studies that compared mirabegron to antimuscarinic drugs, and that evaluated the efficacy, safety or adherence. RevMan 5.4 was used to combine results across studies. We derived risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% CIs using a random-effects meta-analytic model. Cochrane Collaboration Tool and GRADE was applied for risk of bias and quality of the evidence. We included 14 studies with a total of 10,774 patients. Fewer total adverse events was reported in mirabegron group than in antimuscarinics group [RR 0.93 (0.89-0.98)]. The risk of gastrointestinal tract disorders and dry mouth were lower with mirabegron [RR 0,58 (0.48-0.68); 9375 patients; RR 0.44 (0.35-0.56), 9375 patients, respectively]. No difference was reported between mirabegron and antimuscarinics drugs for efficacy. The adherence to treatment was 87.7% in both groups [RR 0.99 (0.98-1.00)]. Mirabegron and antimuscarinics have comparable efficacy and adherence rates; however, mirabegron showed fewer total and isolated adverse events. Comparar o uso de mirabegrom com anticolinérgicos para o tratamento da bexiga hiperativa (BH). Buscas sistemáticas foram realizadas nas bases de dados EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane e LILACS desde o início até setembro de 2021. Incluímos ECR, mulheres com sintomas de BH clinicamente comprovados, estudos que compararam mirabegrom a medicamentos antimuscarínicos e avaliaram a eficácia, segurança ou adesão. RevMan 5.4 foi usado para combinar os resultados entre os estudos. Derivamos razões de risco (RRs) e diferenças médias com intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95% usando um modelo meta-analítico de efeitos aleatórios. Cochrane Collaboration Tool e GRADE foi aplicado para risco de viés e qualidade da evidência. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: Foram incluídos 14 estudos com um total de 10.774 pacientes. Menos eventos adversos totais foram relatados no grupo mirabegrom do que no grupo antimuscarínicos [RR: 0,93 (0,89–0,98)]. O risco de distúrbios do trato gastrointestinal e boca seca foram menores com mirabegrom [RR: 0,58 (0,48–0,68); 9.375 pacientes; RR: 0,44 (0,35–0,56), 9.375 pacientes, respectivamente]. Nenhuma diferença foi relatada entre mirabegrom e drogas antimuscarínicos para eficácia. A adesão ao tratamento foi de 87,7% em ambos os grupos [RR: 0,99 (0,98–1,00)]. CONCLUSãO: Mirabegrom e antimuscarínicos têm eficácia e taxas de adesão comparáveis, porém o mirabegrom apresentou menos eventos adversos totais e isolados.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(por)
Comparar o uso de mirabegrom com anticolinérgicos para o tratamento da bexiga hiperativa (BH).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37494577
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770093
pmc: PMC10371066
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholinergic Antagonists
0
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
mirabegron
MVR3JL3B2V
Acetanilides
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
337-346Informations de copyright
Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):558-563
pubmed: 31039103
J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1892-8
pubmed: 20303119
Drugs Aging. 2020 Nov;37(11):801-816
pubmed: 32960422
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):567-85
pubmed: 21489081
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):283-95
pubmed: 23182126
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Feb;29(2):273-283
pubmed: 28620791
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Oct;30(10):1603-1617
pubmed: 31346670
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):296-305
pubmed: 23195283
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1767-74
pubmed: 22409769
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):56-61
pubmed: 11483904
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Sep;24(9):1447-58
pubmed: 23471546
BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):951-60
pubmed: 24471907
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38(6):1579-1587
pubmed: 31037759
J Urol. 2021 Jun;205(6):1595-1604
pubmed: 33207141
Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 Aug 1;615(1-3):201-6
pubmed: 19446545
Drugs Aging. 2020 Sep;37(9):665-676
pubmed: 32725584
Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Sep;34(7):685-92
pubmed: 25130281
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 Sep;10(3):215-220
pubmed: 28436145
Ther Adv Urol. 2015 Aug;7(4):167-79
pubmed: 26445596
Urol Int. 2016;97(3):325-329
pubmed: 27092789
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;10(2):131-151
pubmed: 28001447
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1241-1249
pubmed: 29331047
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;58(8):1084-1091
pubmed: 29645285
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):577-88
pubmed: 24612659
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):501-509
pubmed: 29866467
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jun 03;11:755-60
pubmed: 27350744
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):1906-1921
pubmed: 31222714
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1055-61
pubmed: 18330483
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):562-575
pubmed: 28418102
World J Urol. 2003 May;20(6):327-36
pubmed: 12811491
Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49
pubmed: 12559262
Drugs Today (Barc). 2012 Jan;48(1):25-32
pubmed: 22384458