Effects of the nitrate and ammonium ratio on plant characteristics and Erythropalum scandens Bl. substrates.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
19
02
2023
accepted:
23
07
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
4
8
2023
entrez:
4
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Erythropalum scandens Bl. is a woody vegetable with high nitrogen demand that inhabits southern China. Ammonium and nitrate are the two main forms of inorganic nitrogen that plants directly absorb. A pot experiment was performed to determine the growth, physiological responses, and preferences of 12-month-old E. scandens seedlings for ammonium and nitrate. Aboveground and underground growth indexes, biomass, physiological and biochemical indexes (chlorophyll [Chl], soluble sugar, soluble protein and free proline contents), and substrate pH and nitrogen contents were determined under different nitrate and ammonium ratios (0 NO3-: 100 NH4+, 25 NO3-: 75 NH4+, 50 NO3-: 50 NH4+, 75 NO3-: 25 NH4+, and 100 NO3-: 0 NH4+), and the control (0 NO3-: 0 NH4+). The results showed that ammonium and nitrate improved the growth and physiological status of E. scandens seedlings in most of the treatments compared to the control. The aboveground growth status and biomass accumulation of E. scandens seedlings were significantly better under the 0 NO3-: 100 NH4+ treatment during fertilization compared with all other treatments. However, the growth status of the underground parts was not significantly different among treatments. Significant differences in osmoregulator content, except for soluble sugars, and Chl content were observed. Soluble sugars and soluble proteins were highest under the 0 NO3-: 100 NH4+ treatment at the end of fertilization (day 175). However, free proline accumulated during fertilization and the increase in NO3- indicated that excessive use of NO3- had a negative effect on the E. scandens seedlings. The order of accumulating nitrogen content was leaves > roots > stems. The highest N accumulation occurred in the aboveground parts under the 0 NO3-: 100 NH4+ treatment, whereas the highest N accumulation occurred in the underground parts under the 50 NO3-: 50 NH4+ treatment. Substrate pH increased at the end of fertilization (day 175) compared with the middle stage (day 75), while total nitrogen, ammonium, and nitrate were highly significantly different among the treatments. Total nitrogen and NH4+ content were the highest under the 0 NO3-: 100 NH4+ treatment, while NO3- content was the highest under the 100 NO3-: 0 NH4+ treatment. In conclusion, 12-month-old E. scandens seedlings grew best, and had better physiological conditions in NH4+ than NO3-. The 0 NO3-:100 NH4+ treatment (ammonium chloride 3.82 g/plant) resulted in the best growth and physiological conditions. Most of the growth and physiological indexes were inhibited with the increase in nitrate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37540657
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289659
pii: PONE-D-23-04915
pmc: PMC10403090
doi:
Substances chimiques
Nitrates
0
Ammonium Compounds
0
Chlorophyll
1406-65-1
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Proline
9DLQ4CIU6V
Sugars
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289659Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 7;12(1):16841
pubmed: 36207586
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Dec;61:29-35
pubmed: 23031845
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Apr;29(4):2238-2246
pubmed: 35531200
Ann Bot. 2013 Oct;112(6):957-63
pubmed: 23884397
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Sep;154:11-20
pubmed: 32516683
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Jun;139:246-255
pubmed: 30921736
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Apr 30;151:266-271
pubmed: 29407559
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 Oct;167:561-566
pubmed: 34454315
J Plant Physiol. 2023 Jan;280:153888
pubmed: 36577314
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 1;763:143029
pubmed: 33129526
Int J Phytoremediation. 2015;17(1-6):56-65
pubmed: 25174425
Plant Sci. 2022 Nov;324:111416
pubmed: 35995109
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Mar;34(3):525-34
pubmed: 21118424
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Sep;216:79-87
pubmed: 28578080
Plant Sci. 2022 Sep;322:111347
pubmed: 35700842