Left bundle branch area pacing for heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis.
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
left bundle branch area pacing
physiological pacing
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
revised:
06
07
2023
received:
28
02
2023
accepted:
11
07
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) is a novel conduction system pacing method to achieve effective physiological pacing and an alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We conduted this meta-analysis and systemic review to review current data comparing BVP and LBBP in patients with HFrEF and indications for CRT. We searched PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from the inception of the database to November 2022. All studies that compared LBBP with BVP in patients with HFrEF and indications for CRT were included. Two reviewers performed study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with the Mantel-Haenszel method and mean difference (MD) with inverse variance using random effect models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I Ten studies (9 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial; 616 patients; 15 centers) published between 2020 and 2022 were included. We observed a shorter fluoroscopy time (MD: 9.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.49-14.87, I This meta-analysis of primarily nonrandomized studies suggests that LBBP is associated with a greater improvement in left ventricular systolic function and a lower rate of HFH compared to BVP. There was uniformity of these findings in all of the included studies. However, it would be premature to conclude based solely on the current meta-analysis alone, given the limitations stated. Dedicated, well-designed, randomized controlled trials and observational studies are needed to elucidate better the comparative long-term efficacy and safety of LBBP CRT versus BIV CRT.
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1933-1943Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789-1858.
Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:46.
Baldasseroni S, Gentile A, Gorini M, et al. Intraventricular conduction defects in patients with congestive heart failure: left but not right bundle branch block is an independent predictor of prognosis. A report from the Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure (IN-CHF database). Ital Heart J. 2003;4:607-613.
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e895-e1032.
McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Hooton N, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;297:2502-2514.
Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011;123:1061-1072.
Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539-1549.
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140-2150.
Daubert C, Behar N, Martins RP, Mabo P, Leclercq C. Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1463-1472.
Hummel JD, Coppess MA, Osborn JS, et al. Real-World assessment of acute left ventricular lead implant success and complication rates: results from the attain success clinical trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:1246-1253.
Huang W, Su L, Wu S, et al. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019;105:137-143.
Lewis AJM, Foley P, Whinnett Z, Keene D, Chandrasekaran B. His bundle pacing: a new strategy for physiological ventricular activation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e010972.
Vinther M, Risum N, Svendsen JH, Møgelvang R, Philbert BT. A randomized trial of his pacing versus biventricular pacing in symptomatic HF patients with left bundle branch block (His-alternative). JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:1422-1432.
Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Herweg B, et al. Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:413-420.
Huang W, Su L, Wu S, et al. A novel pacing strategy with low and stable output: pacing the left bundle branch immediately beyond the conduction block. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1736.
Vijayaraman P, Ponnusamy S, Cano Ó, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7:135-147.
Wang Y, Zhu H, Hou X, et al. Randomized trial of left bundle branch vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1205-1216.
Strocchi M, Lee AWC, Neic A, et al. His-bundle and left bundle pacing with optimized atrioventricular delay achieve superior electrical synchrony over endocardial and epicardial pacing in left bundle branch block patients. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17:1922-1929.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Innovation in Science and Medicine. Program for the Protection of Human Subjects/Institutional Review Board. 2023. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://icahn.mssm.edu/about/faculty-resources/handbook/research/irb
Huang W, Chen X, Su L, Wu S, Xia X, Vijayaraman P. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1791-1796.
Higgins JPT. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
Willis BH, Riley RD. Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice. Stat Med. 2017;36:3283-3301.
Guo J, Li L, Xiao G, et al. Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43:1460-1468.
Li X, Qiu C, Xie R, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7:1711-1722.
Wang Y, Gu K, Qian Z, et al. The efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: a matched case-control study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31:2068-2077.
Wu S, Su L, Vijayaraman P, et al. Left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: non-randomized on treatment comparison with His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:319-328.
Liu W, Hu C, Wang Y, et al. Mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing and comparison with biventricular pacing. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:727611.
Gu Y, Li Y, Zhu Y, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients by using left bundle branch pacing. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:990016.
Zu L, Wang Z, Hang F, et al. Cardiac resynchronization performed by LBBaP-CRT in patients with cardiac insufficiency and left bundle branch block. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021;26:e12898.
Chen X, Ye Y, Wang Z, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing vs. optimized biventricular pacing with adaptive algorithm in heart failure with left bundle branch block: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study. Europace. 2022;24:807-816.
Hua J, Chen Y, Yu J, et al. Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block. Heart Vessels. 2022;37:1162-1174.
Rademakers LM, van den Broek J, Bracke FA. Left bundle branch pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Neth Heart J. 2023;31(4):140-149.
Feng XF, Yang LC, Zhao Y, Yu YC, Liu B, Li YG. Effects of adaptive left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single centre experience. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22:360.
Vijayaraman P, Cano O, Ponnusamy SS, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022;3:358-367.
Sharma PS, Patel NR, Ravi V, et al. Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to right ventricular pacing: results from the Geisinger-Rush Conduction System Pacing Registry. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:3-11.
Okubo Y, Miyamoto S, Uotani Y, et al. Clinical impact of left bundle branch area pacing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mid-range ejection fraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;45:499-508.
Padala SK, Master VM, Terricabras M, et al. Initial experience, safety, and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing: a multicenter prospective study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:1773-1782.
Ravi V, Hanifin JL, Larsen T, Huang HD, Trohman RG, Sharma PS. Pros and cons of left bundle branch pacing: a single-center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13:e008874.
Su L, Wang S, Wu S, et al. Long-term safety and feasibility of left bundle branch pacing in a large single-center study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14:e009261.
Vijayaraman P, Zalavadia D, Haseeb A, et al. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1263-1271.
Jastrzębski M, Kiełbasa G, Cano O, et al. Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre european MELOS study. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4161-4173.
Pujol-Lopez M, Jiménez-Arjona R, Garre P, et al. Conduction system pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure and wide QRS patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8:1431-1445.
Liang Y, Wang J, Gong X, et al. Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for acute cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15:e011181.
Vijayaraman P, Herweg B, Verma A, et al. Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1272-1280.
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3427-3520.
Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. Published online May 20, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538
Cheng L, Zhang J, Wang Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e036972.