Emergency department crowding and mortality: an observational multicenter study in Sweden.
access block
crowding
emergency department
occupancy
overcrowding
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
accepted:
05
07
2023
medline:
11
8
2023
pubmed:
10
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emergency department (ED) crowding is a serious problem worldwide causing decreased quality of care. It is reasonable to assume that the negative effects of crowding are at least partially due to high staff workload, but previous crowding metrics based on high workload have not been generalisable to Swedish EDs and have not been associated with increased mortality, in contrast to, e.g., occupancy rate. We recently derived and validated the modified Skåne Emergency Department Assessment of Patient Load model (mSEAL) that measures crowding based on staff workload in Swedish EDs, but its ability to identify situations with increased mortality is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between ED crowding measured by mSEAL model, or occupancy rate, and mortality. All ED patients from 2017-01-01 to 2017-06-30 from two regional healthcare systems (Skåne and Östergötland Counties with a combined population of approximately 1.8 million) in Sweden were included. Exposure was ED- and hour-adjusted mSEAL or occupancy rate. Primary outcome was mortality within 7 days of ED arrival, with one-day and 30-day mortality as secondary outcomes. We used Cox regression hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age, sex, arrival by ambulance, hospital admission and chief complaint. We included a total of 122,893 patients with 168,900 visits to the six participating EDs. Arriving at an hour with a mSEAL score above the 95th percentile for that ED and hour of day was associated with an non-significant HR for death at 7 days of 1.04 (95% CI 0.96-1.13). For one- and 30-day mortality the HR was non-significant at 1.03 (95% CI 0.9-1.18) and 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.09). Similarly, occupancy rate above the 95th percentile with a HR of 1.04 (95% CI 0.9-1.19), 1.03 (95%CI 0.95-1.13) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11) for one-, 7- and 30-day mortality, respectively. In this multicenter study in Sweden, ED crowding measured by mSEAL or occupancy rate was not associated with a significant increase in short-term mortality.
Sections du résumé
Background
Emergency department (ED) crowding is a serious problem worldwide causing decreased quality of care. It is reasonable to assume that the negative effects of crowding are at least partially due to high staff workload, but previous crowding metrics based on high workload have not been generalisable to Swedish EDs and have not been associated with increased mortality, in contrast to, e.g., occupancy rate. We recently derived and validated the modified Skåne Emergency Department Assessment of Patient Load model (mSEAL) that measures crowding based on staff workload in Swedish EDs, but its ability to identify situations with increased mortality is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between ED crowding measured by mSEAL model, or occupancy rate, and mortality.
Methods
All ED patients from 2017-01-01 to 2017-06-30 from two regional healthcare systems (Skåne and Östergötland Counties with a combined population of approximately 1.8 million) in Sweden were included. Exposure was ED- and hour-adjusted mSEAL or occupancy rate. Primary outcome was mortality within 7 days of ED arrival, with one-day and 30-day mortality as secondary outcomes. We used Cox regression hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age, sex, arrival by ambulance, hospital admission and chief complaint.
Results
We included a total of 122,893 patients with 168,900 visits to the six participating EDs. Arriving at an hour with a mSEAL score above the 95th percentile for that ED and hour of day was associated with an non-significant HR for death at 7 days of 1.04 (95% CI 0.96-1.13). For one- and 30-day mortality the HR was non-significant at 1.03 (95% CI 0.9-1.18) and 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.09). Similarly, occupancy rate above the 95th percentile with a HR of 1.04 (95% CI 0.9-1.19), 1.03 (95%CI 0.95-1.13) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11) for one-, 7- and 30-day mortality, respectively.
Conclusion
In this multicenter study in Sweden, ED crowding measured by mSEAL or occupancy rate was not associated with a significant increase in short-term mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37559736
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198188
pmc: PMC10407086
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1198188Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wretborn, Wilhelms and Ekelund.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 19;3(1):e12648
pubmed: 35079734
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Nov;41:25-30
pubmed: 29880260
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 04;15:537
pubmed: 26637373
J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):623-8
pubmed: 18930373
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0130020
pubmed: 26083596
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Jan 27;:
pubmed: 33501766
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;74(3):345-356
pubmed: 31229391
Front Public Health. 2019 Sep 12;7:267
pubmed: 31572707
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Aug;33(4):655-664
pubmed: 33300257
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 26;20(1):356
pubmed: 32336295
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316
pubmed: 30161242
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Sep 12;1(6):1312-1319
pubmed: 33392538
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):602-11
pubmed: 24926707
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):67-74
pubmed: 30481305
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1269-77
pubmed: 22168190
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):15-24, 24.e1-2
pubmed: 17980458
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 13;19:37
pubmed: 21668987
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1092-100
pubmed: 25308131
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):605-611.e6
pubmed: 23218508
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):643-56
pubmed: 25996053
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):50
pubmed: 32552701
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;76(2):179-190
pubmed: 31983500
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;8(11):1037-43
pubmed: 11691665
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1358-70
pubmed: 22168200
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247881
pubmed: 33690653
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):370-6
pubmed: 25534384
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Dec 08;19:72
pubmed: 22151969
Med J Aust. 2006 Mar 6;184(5):213-6
pubmed: 16515430
J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):241-9
pubmed: 23992849
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2020 Aug;38(3):549-562
pubmed: 32616278