Ultra-short columns for the chromatographic analysis of large molecules.
Biopharmaceuticals
Fast analysis
Monoclonal antibodies
Ultra-short columns
Journal
Journal of chromatography. A
ISSN: 1873-3778
Titre abrégé: J Chromatogr A
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9318488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2023
13 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
23
06
2023
revised:
31
07
2023
accepted:
04
08
2023
medline:
23
8
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
10
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Today, reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) analysis of proteins is almost exclusively performed on conventional columns (100-150 mm) in gradient elution mode. However, it was shown many years ago that large molecules present an on/off retention mechanism, and that only a very short inlet segment of the chromatographic column retains effectively the large molecules. Much shorter columns - like only a few centimetres or even a few millimetres - can therefore be used to efficiently analyse such macromolecules. The aim of this review is to summarise the historical and more recent works related to the use of very short columns for the analysis of model and therapeutic proteins. To this end, we have outlined the theoretical concepts behind the use of short columns, as well as the instrumental limitations and potential applications. Finally, we have shown that these very short columns were also possibly interesting for other chromatographic modes, such as ion exchange chromatography (IEX), hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) or hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), as analyses in these chromatographic modes are performed in gradient elution mode.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37562104
pii: S0021-9673(23)00510-1
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464285
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proteins
0
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
464285Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.