A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results.
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
Computed tomography
Deep learning
Dual-energy CT
Image reconstruction
Journal
Journal of digital imaging
ISSN: 1618-727X
Titre abrégé: J Digit Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100529
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2023
12 2023
Historique:
received:
29
06
2023
accepted:
27
07
2023
revised:
29
06
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
15
8
2023
entrez:
14
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) in improving image quality and diagnostic performance using virtual monochromatic spectral images in abdominal dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Sixty-two patients [mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 56 years ± 13; 30 men] who underwent abdominal DECT were prospectively included in this study. The 70-keV DECT images in the portal phase were reconstructed at 5-mm and 1.25-mm slice thicknesses with 40% ASIR-V (ASIR-V40%) and at 1.25-mm slice with deep learning image reconstruction at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H) levels and then compared. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation, SD values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in the liver, spleen, erector spinae, and intramuscular fat. The lesions in each reconstruction group at 1.25-mm slice thickness were counted. The image quality and diagnostic confidence were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists using a 5-point scale. For the 1.25-mm images, DLIR-M and DLIR-H had lower SD, higher SNR and CNR, and better subjective image quality compared with ASIR-V40%; DLIR-H performed the best (all P values < 0.001). Furthermore, the 1.25-mm DLIR-H images had similar SD, SNR, and CNR values as the 5-mm ASIR-V40% images (all P > 0.05). Three image groups had similar lesion detection rates, but DLIR groups exhibited higher confidence in diagnosing lesions. Compared with ASIR-V40% at 70 keV, 70-keV DECT with DLIR-H further reduced image noise and improved image quality. Additionally, it improved diagnostic confidence while ensuring a consistent lesion detection rate of liver lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37580484
doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00893-y
pii: 10.1007/s10278-023-00893-y
pmc: PMC10584787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2347-2355Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;14(20):
pubmed: 36291800
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(23):1726
pubmed: 35071420
Hepatology. 2018 Aug;68(2):723-750
pubmed: 29624699
Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2117-24
pubmed: 22618521
Radiol Med. 2021 Jul;126(7):925-935
pubmed: 33954894
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):327-42
pubmed: 24761954
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25814
pubmed: 34106619
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jan 4;2022:2146343
pubmed: 35069041
Invest Radiol. 2012 May;47(5):292-8
pubmed: 22472797
Radiographics. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):1037-55
pubmed: 20631367
Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):720-9
pubmed: 21357524
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5499-5507
pubmed: 35238970
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20170448
pubmed: 29762057
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:47-53
pubmed: 28267548
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Nov;7(6):063503
pubmed: 33344672
Br J Radiol. 2022 Jun 1;95(1134):20211163
pubmed: 35230135
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):444-451
pubmed: 31974008
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 Feb;52(1):4-9
pubmed: 18373819
Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):637-53
pubmed: 26302388
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):424-431
pubmed: 34327575
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jun;22(6):970-982
pubmed: 33856133
Clin Radiol. 2023 Jun;78(6):430-436
pubmed: 37019736
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):384-394
pubmed: 34131785
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(6):1930-1938
pubmed: 35363342