Identifying the structures and taste characteristics of two novel Maillard reaction products in tea.
Maillard reaction products
Molecular docking
Sensory evaluation
Tea
d-galacturonic acid
l-theanine
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jan 2024
15 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
08
02
2023
revised:
25
07
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
17
8
2023
entrez:
16
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Maillard reaction products (MRPs) produced during thermal processing of tea are intimately related to its flavor. Our recent work revealed that both levels of l-theanine and d-galacturonic acid in tea leaves decreased dramatically during drying, whereas the specific MRPs from l-theanine and d-galacturonic acid remain elusive. Here, the MRPs formed from l-theanine and d-galacturonic acid were investigated and their taste characteristics and the involved mechanisms were explored. Two novel MRPs from l-theanine and d-galacturonic acid were identified as 1-(1-carboxy-4-(ethylamino)-4-oxobutyl)-3-hydroxypyridin-1-ium (MRP 1) and 2-(2-formyl-1H-pyrrole-1-yl) theanine (MRP 2). MRP 1 and MRP 2 accumulated in dark tea and black tea and were associated with sour (threshold, 0.25 mg/mL) and astringent tastes and an umami taste (threshold, 0.18 mg/mL), respectively. Molecular docking revealed that the taste characteristics of MRPs may be due to strong binding to umami taste receptor proteins (CASR, T1R1/T1R3) and the sour taste protein OTOP1 via hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37586230
pii: S0308-8146(23)01743-0
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137125
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
galacturonic acid
4JK6RN80GF
Tea
0
Glycation End Products, Advanced
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
137125Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.