Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-High Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial.
Bintrafusp alfa
NSCLC
PD-L1
Phase 3
Journal
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
ISSN: 1556-1380
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
01
06
2023
revised:
07
08
2023
accepted:
10
08
2023
medline:
27
11
2023
pubmed:
20
8
2023
entrez:
19
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival. Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1-16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1-15.9 mo) for pembrolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent review committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo-not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo-NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885-1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo-NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo-NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796-1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point. First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high, advanced NSCLC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37597750
pii: S1556-0864(23)00738-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
CD274 protein, human
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Immunologic Factors
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1731-1742Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.